• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Progress OR Sexual Immorality?

If you are a liberal, congratulations. You have made much progress in gaining acceptance for many different groups of people with a wide variety of sexual preferences. Are there others you want to help because society is not yet comfortable with them coming out of their closet?
If you are a conservative, you may be uncomfortable with this wide variety of sexuality on full display, but you may suspect it will expand. What kind of sexual behavior that is currently in the closet, will liberals put in the spotlight next, with hopes of gaining social acceptance?
You mean political acceptance.
 
If you are a liberal, congratulations. You have made much progress in gaining acceptance for many different groups of people with a wide variety of sexual preferences. Are there others you want to help because society is not yet comfortable with them coming out of their closet?
If you are a conservative, you may be uncomfortable with this wide variety of sexuality on full display, but you may suspect it will expand. What kind of sexual behavior that is currently in the closet, will liberals put in the spotlight next, with hopes of gaining social acceptance?

.Cheating on your pregnant wife with a porn star


That will become accepted next
 
Consent. If they are capable of consent for a sex change, then wouldn't the left say they can be in a consensual sexual relationship with adults?
I don't know or care what the "left" says. I'm not making a partisan argument. Sex change is also a Red Herring. The issue is consent for sexual activity. Can children give consent for sex? No!
 
When did they say it?

I dunno. I wasn't there. All I can do is provide you with sources to back-up what I say, as appropriate. All I can tell you--correctly--is that there is a push in academia to normalize pedophillia.

Trump Derangement Syndrome on full display.

At normalizing pedophilia?

What an ignorant and hateful thing to say!

Your posts are getting more unhinged by the minute. Perhaps you do not like to think about the 63 million people who voted for the sex predator in 2016? Or perhaps you do not have a problem with them.
 
I don't know or care what the "left" says. I'm not making a partisan argument. Sex change is also a Red Herring. The issue is consent for sexual activity. Can children give consent for sex? No!
Yet watch.

I lay odds that will be one of the lefts next perversions to make acceptable.
 

Progress OR Sexual Immorality?​

What exactly is "sexual immorality" and what makes it immoral? Especially if it's something between consenting adults?
I think it's mostly about stuff that doesn't happen between consenting adults stuff involving children that people have a problem with.
 
Consent. If they are capable of consent for a sex change, then wouldn't the left say they can be in a consensual sexual relationship with adults?
No.

Super easy.

Now, try working on not blaming 'the left' for your failure to reason well.
 
Your posts are getting more unhinged by the minute.
You think?

I wonder why?

Nobody's raving so I've no idea what your concern is.
Perhaps you do not like to think about the 63 million people who voted for the sex predator in 2016? Or perhaps you do not have a problem with them.
I give it no more consideration that all those folks who voted for the rapist, Bill Clinton.
 
A 15 year old can't consent to a man touching their breasts but they can consent to a man chopping it off?
A minor cannot consent to sex. A minor can receive professional medical treatment with the consent of parents or guardians. This is not hard.

Which one do you think does more damage?
Sexual assault, and pederasty, obviously.
 
A minor cannot consent to sex. A minor can receive professional medical treatment with the consent of parents or guardians. This is not hard.
That's not medical treatment it's abuse


Sexual assault, and pederasty, obviously.
I would call chopping up 15 year olds so that you can milk money out of them for life sexual assault and pederasty as well as a scam.
 
...is not a professional medical statement. It's a growl. So, cool. You can growl.


...and you can screech.

View attachment 67399305
Trying to mock me because I don't support sexual abuse of children?

Thank you. I never want to be mistaken for approving of that kind of behavior. You call me all the names you want for not agreeing with this insanity. It's like if like the KKK calling me a n-word lover.
 
Trying to mock me because I don't support sexual abuse of children?
You aren't making a case. You're using growl words. If you feel mocked by my description, that's a you problem.

Thank you. I never want to be mistaken for approving of that kind of behavior. You call me all the names you want for not agreeing with this insanity. It's like if like the KKK calling me a n-word lover.
I defer to Abed again.
 
A minor cannot consent to sex. A minor can receive professional medical treatment with the consent of parents or guardians. This is not hard.
And when the parents give another adult permissions to have sex with their daughter, how is that one?
 
You aren't making a case.
That castrating children is wrong?

You're using growl words.
Translation: "you made a good argument that I can't debate so I'm just going to accuse you of some made up nonsense that means nothing."
If you feel mocked by my description, that's a you problem.
it's like being mocked by a Neo-Nazi. Thanks for the compliment. I don't ever want to be considered in agreement with someone who supports this sadistic horrendous behavior.

So give me the gift of your hate I cherish it
 
That castrating children is wrong?

So, there it is again. You're growling. Instead of acknowledging that it's a lengthy process with multiple safeguards and layers of therapy and medical oversight built in, you're trying to emote your way loudly to a feeling of victory. This isn't dialogue. You're having a tantrum.
Translation: "you made a good argument that I can't debate so I'm just going to accuse you of some made up nonsense that means nothing."
it's like being mocked by a Neo-Nazi. Thanks for the compliment. I don't ever want to be considered in agreement with someone who supports this sadistic horrendous behavior.

So give me the gift of your hate I cherish it
No, silly, it's a reference to Abed, a character played by Danny Pudi, on Community. It's what the writers had him say when faced with irrational outbursts or motivated selfishness.
 
So, there it is again. You're growling.
so this is what you do when you can't counter a point fair enough.

In history you're going to be remembered like the people who supported conversion therapy.

No, silly, it's a reference to Abed, a character played by Danny Pudi, on Community. It's what the writers had him say when faced with irrational outbursts or motivated selfishness.
I'm glad you feel this way about me.

And I'm glad you're avoiding any kind of argument it means you've lost. This is one of those hearts and minds things.
 
I think it's mostly about stuff that doesn't happen between consenting adults stuff involving children that people have a problem with.
That's understandable. But "sexual immorality" is vague. Perhaps that should have been made clear at the very beginning.
Yet watch.

I lay odds that will be one of the lefts next perversions to make acceptable.
Let me know when you have something of value or relevance beyond a "what if" or maybe scenario.
And when the parents give another adult permissions to have sex with their daughter, how is that one?
That's considered child endangerment. And the child themself still cannot consent.
 
That's understandable. But "sexual immorality" is vague.
Only if you believe morality is relative. We have a standard that is very clear cut in what is it isn't moral and I'm talking about the minimum since that's the only threshold applied. It's consent.
Perhaps that should have been made clear at the very beginning.
If he didn't make it clear then you must default to the only threshold applied. That is legality.
 
Back
Top Bottom