• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Progress OR Sexual Immorality?

She thinks castrating and butchering children is medical Care. In the best of worlds it's eugenics.
Yep. They won't admit it, but they most certainly love their form of eugenics.
 
Yep. They won't admit it, but they most certainly love their form of eugenics.
Well really it's that they don't care about people they care about ideas. That's why they cry at you all day about how evil you are for kink shaming the people that walk around in jumpsuits but the second day find out that maybe you have a thing for feet ill attack you relentlessly.

I remember watching interview with buck Angel this is a transgender man that starred in some pornographic films. They attacked him because of the things he said it doesn't matter that he's trans it matters what ideas he has. And if he doesn't believe the world is absolutely out to get him and that we must affirm all notions of transgender even in four year olds he must be transphobic.

This guy is a porn star... Not some bastion of conservative values
 
If you are a liberal, congratulations. You have made much progress in gaining acceptance for many different groups of people with a wide variety of sexual preferences. Are there others you want to help because society is not yet comfortable with them coming out of their closet?
If you are a conservative, you may be uncomfortable with this wide variety of sexuality on full display, but you may suspect it will expand. What kind of sexual behavior that is currently in the closet, will liberals put in the spotlight next, with hopes of gaining social acceptance?
Once sexual attraction became excepted as nature rather than a nurture anything goes.
 
Only if you believe morality is relative. We have a standard that is very clear cut in what is it isn't moral and I'm talking about the minimum since that's the only threshold applied. It's consent.
If he didn't make it clear then you must default to the only threshold applied. That is legality.
I'm still waiting to hear what "sexual immortality" actually is? But I agree legal consent is a key point.
 
Anyone in the profession who doubts that have been excommunicated........
no not really in fact I think it's coming back in Vogue. Read about gender and sexual fluidity.

I would say anyone in the profession that has doubts probably has them because of some sort of religious conviction. There is zero evidence that it's nurture and in fact I think the evidence suggests that it most likely isn't. I would imagine if somebody came up with it sound theory as to what they would get somewhere it's just it never is so guess work and it's based on debunked freudianism.
Is the attraction to children nature or nurture?
I don't know. The most common childhood experience that pedophiles share is sexual abuse as children themselves. There is a strong correlation here. It's not proof but it is an environmental factor that definitely has an effect on it. So I'm leaning towards environmental/nurture.

A strong correlation to a particular experience in childhood does not seem to correlate with homosexuality.
 
I'm still waiting to hear what "sexual immortality" actually is? But I agree legal consent is a key point.
The absence of an answer means you must default to the minimum morality which is law.

Put it on him. I asked him a question about his question and he fell to absolute pieces. Post 176. He was so butt hurt about it.

When you can crush sometime by just asking a question ask directly and succinct. He'll accuse you of avoiding the debate is really rather funny.
 
When you can crush sometime by just asking a question ask directly and succinct. He'll accuse you of avoiding the debate is really rather funny.
Indeed.
 
The flaw in the pedophilia argument is that minors are unable to consent. Adults, homosexual or otherwise, can.
There is no flaw in my argument.

I simply and correctly answered the OP.
 
There is no flaw in my argument.

I simply and correctly answered the OP.
So the "sexual immortality" stated in the title refers to pedophilia specifically or other non-consentual issues?
 
So the "sexual immortality" stated in the title refers to pedophilia specifically or other non-consentual issues?
Should have said "sexual immorality," not immortality. Lousy autocorrect.
 
Once you start down a slippery slope it's hard to stop. They have traveled down a long ways but still have much farther to go.
As much as anything it's a question of acting responsibly and assuming responsibility for your actions. The left seems to be on a crusade to relieve people of any consequences for their behavior. Abortion, no bail imposed for criminals, felons released from incarceration early or not prosecuted at all, major crimes plea bargained down to a minor offense which puts violent criminals back on the street to commit more crimes.
Then you have the acceptence of just about any behavior as normal. The push of transwomen participating in womens athletics when it's clear that they have a large advantage. Men just are not women and vice versa.
 
As much as anything it's a question of acting responsibly and assuming responsibility for your actions. The left seems to be on a crusade to relieve people of any consequences for their behavior. Abortion, no bail imposed for criminals, felons released from incarceration early or not prosecuted at all, major crimes plea bargained down to a minor offense which puts violent criminals back on the street to commit more crimes.
Then you have the acceptence of just about any behavior as normal. The push of transwomen participating in womens athletics when it's clear that they have a large advantage. Men just are not women and vice versa.
If one's behavior does not violate the law or cause unwanted harm, then how is it a problem?
 
If you can't understand the fundamental difference between bestiality and consensual sex, then you can't understand the basics of human sexuality.
They don’t really do “understanding stuff”, proven here day in and day out.
 
As much as anything it's a question of acting responsibly and assuming responsibility for your actions. The left seems to be on a crusade to relieve people of any consequences for their behavior. Abortion, no bail imposed for criminals, felons released from incarceration early or not prosecuted at all, major crimes plea bargained down to a minor offense which puts violent criminals back on the street to commit more crimes.
Then you have the acceptence of just about any behavior as normal. The push of transwomen participating in womens athletics when it's clear that they have a large advantage. Men just are not women and vice versa.
Funny that you include having sex with a bunch of criminal activity.

Christianity has a long history of forbidding anything that makes this life pleasurable.

Because it’s really really hard to sell privation in this life in exchange for awesomeness in an afterlife if life itself is sweet. It’s a dick move IMO but it sure works a treat! Even though it took a lot of murder and imprisonment to keep the libertines from telling the pious about the good stuff they’re missing.
 
There is no flaw in my argument.

I simply and correctly answered the OP.
Well if you're comparing pedophilia to homosexuality that's a flaw because those two things aren't similar. You made this like them both equally which is strange to me I wouldn't be far more worried about someone who wants to hurt kids and someone who wants to get their rocks off with other adults. But I don't presume to know what other people think
 
Back
Top Bottom