• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-Russian Twitter account used non-public material from Mueller's team in effort to discredit Russ

lwf said:
I think we've officially come full circle in this argument. My position is that reasonable grounds to open an investigation on whether or not our current president colluded with Russia to win the election are as apparent as the nose on their face to anyone with even a cursory knowledge of American laws. And, it would seem, the FBI, (professional investigators run by a republican government, headed by a republican AG, and with a republican special investigator,) agree with that assessment. At this point, challenging the merits of the investigation has become nothing more than a ludicrous exercise in semantics fit only for conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

You're mistaken, because "collusion" isn't a crime. Receiving stolen documents isn't a crime, neither.
 
apdst said:
It's nice to see you finally admit that this is probably protected speech.
Click to expand...

Russia is not protected by our Constitution and you know it. They do not have any 1st amendment rights.
 
iguanaman said:
Russia is not protected by our Constitution and you know it. They do not have any 1st amendment rights.
Click to expand...

So, it's illegal for foreigners to post their opinions on U.S. based websites?
 
apdst said:
You're mistaken, because "collusion" isn't a crime. Receiving stolen documents isn't a crime, neither.
Click to expand...

Aiding and abetting anyone in the commission of a crime is a illegal. It's called a conspiracy and one of many crimes Trump is guilty of.
 
iguanaman said:
Aiding and abetting anyone in the commission of a crime is a illegal. It's called a conspiracy and one of many crimes Trump is guilty of.
Click to expand...

And so far, not one single person has been idicted for "aiding and abetting a crime", nor "conspiracy to commit a crime".
 
apdst said:
So, it's illegal for foreigners to post their opinions on U.S. based websites?
Click to expand...

It is fraud to post propaganda under a false identity for the purpose of misleading the public. Yes.
 
apdst said:
And so far, not one single person has been idicted for "aiding and abetting a crime", nor "conspiracy to commit a crime".
Click to expand...

Manafort's passing of internal campaign data to Russia was aiding and abetting Russian interference in our election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom