When you try to equate medical procedures with those of historical dictators, it's obvious you're trying to insert or elicit some emotional response and divert away from the procedure itself.
You're welcome. And you might consider trying "cut and paste" sometime - it's an incredibly common method for posting information on the Internet.
Not really a "fail" at all.. Why? because you are either unaware that the unborn are not children, or you do know the unborn are not children, and are being disingenuous by referring to the unborn as children. Children enjoy/have/retain all of the rights as any adult. The unborn have zero rights, per the laws of the land.
Your dismissal is laughable. You stated the meds "poison," which it does not. So that is just a flat out lie! "Unborn baby" is an oxymoron and "pregnancy" and "tissue" are accurate terms. Yes, the meds are designed to end a pregnancy. That is the point. I even explained the mechanism of action behind it. So not only are you being disingenuous, you're also lying! And you've been called out on it.
Y'all can play your little semantic games all you want to assuage your guilt over the obvious - it's clear you refuse to be persuaded, either factually, intellectually, or emotionally. So, we're done - and you're dismissed.
Speak for yourself. You've offered no facts and rely on appeals to emotion and misinformation.
'Facts' regarding the unborn =/= "semantic games."
Some people sure seem to be factually bankrupt.
And that infantile cheap shot about "assuaging guilt" just goes to validate the inept, bankrupt argument is rooted in 'emotion'---not 'facts'. Guarantee you I have much more skin in the game regarding the unborn than the judgmental 'finger pointer' does.
I find most, if not all arguments against abortion are rooted in emotion and/or religion. Such arguments inherently have built in misinformation or bias, demonstrating a lack of credibility in the one making such an argument.
It's hilarious when they try to use the guilt card, as if that's going to mean anything, much less sway one's position. It's pure appeal to emotion, which is also a logical fallacy.
Let the anti choicers pay for them.
Let's see how fast they become pro-choicers, Lol
So if abortion were to be made illegal, the only people who should bear the financial burden are those who support abortion being illegal?
That seems fair. After all, abortion is far cheaper and easier than gestation, birth, and child rearing.
Sounds reasonable to me. Using the conservatives' own ever-present whine, "Why should I have to pay for the incarcerated, homeless, jobless, mentally disabled that the conservative Christian anti-abortion jerks created, by banning abortion (and probably contraceptives, also)?"
You sound like a grumpy loser
Really??? !!!! Well, blow me down. Can you give us a link?
Abortion isn't not the only or the best solution to unplanned and unwanted pregnancy. But nobody in the anti-abortion movement wants to talk about how to reduce the number of abortions. You want disgusting? Disgusting is the reason why anti-abortion advocates only want to talk about abortion. Let us know when you are ready to stop talking about abortion and have a real conversation about contraception, universal health insurance, funding women's reproductive clinics, honest sex-education, real morality and the Constitution.
I suppose you need to be reminded only the woman gets pregnant, has to deal with all possible issues and complications of pregnancy and childbirth (to say nothing of associated costs), and has the right to choose to continue the pregnancy or not. Whether abortion is the only way of dealing with it is up to the woman to decide.
Ummm, I have said that numerous times. Although dropping universal health insurance in there is a new twist.
What's holding you back from starting the conversation yourself. Talk honestly about what is going on with sex-ed in schools. Talk about contraceptives and what the far right is really up to. Talk about women like you thought they were intelligent and responsible people. Talk about what reproductive clinics are really doing instead of flinging accusations about aborting two days before birth.
“Only the woman” has to deal with the associated costs?