• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Presidential election maps by county since 1968...

Leaving aside that Vermont was not a state until four years after the Continental Convention and that the cotton gin wasn't invented until six years later and the fact that despite that invention slavery not only continued full steam and the slave trade was not abolished by the U.S. until 1808 (but continued anyway) and there had to be a compromise in 1820 to prevent slavery from spreading after Missouri was admitted (which was then nullified by the KS-NE Act of 1854) and the 3/5 rule had everything to do with counting slaves as 3/5 of a person in order for the Southern states to goose up its population for representation purpose (which slaves got none of) everything else your wrote is irrelevant.

You’re listening to leftist sources. The 3/5ths clause had to do with representation, but included the whole nation, and nothing to do with slaves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Leaving aside that Vermont was not a state until four years after the Continental Convention and that the cotton gin wasn't invented until six years later and the fact that despite that invention slavery not only continued full steam and the slave trade was not abolished by the U.S. until 1808 (but continued anyway) and there had to be a compromise in 1820 to prevent slavery from spreading after Missouri was admitted (which was then nullified by the KS-NE Act of 1854) and the 3/5 rule had everything to do with counting slaves as 3/5 of a person in order for the Southern states to goose up its population for representation purpose (which slaves got none of) everything else your wrote is irrelevant.

Considering the vast majority was rural anyways at that point, and Vermont was a state early on, it doesn’t matter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom