I've been saying this all along that Bush started the war months before receiving permission from Congress. Which is an impeachable offense.The White House memo
Published: 2 Feb 2006
By: Gary Gibbon
Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colours to lure Saddam into war.
Speaking to Channel 4 News, Mr Sands said:
"I think no one would be surprised at the idea that the use of spy-planes to review what is going on would be considered. What is surprising is the idea that they would be used painted in the colours of the United Nations in order to provoke an attack which could then be used to justify material breach. Now that plainly looks as if it is deception, and it raises some fundamental questions of legality, both in terms of domestic law and international law."
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1661
Billo_Really said:I've been saying this all along that Bush started the war months before receiving permission from Congress. Which is an impeachable offense.
We ran over 2000 sorties dropping over 600 bombs on over 300 pre-selected targets when we were telling the world that we were enforcing the "no-fly" zone. Bush needs to be impeached.
Instead of being sarcastic and offering nothing new to the conversation, why don't you address the points being raised as reason for the impeachment. I mean, people are not making this stuff up.Originally posted by KCConservative:
Hey, there's something we haven't heard in a while. Impeachment. Yeah, he should be impeached. I already asked in post #2, but why hasn't he been?
This president has lied, the last president lied, and Bush Sr. lied...SO WHO THE "F" CARES!'President' Lies (again!) in SOTU Address
Okay, I will address the point of impeachment. So how's that coming along, anyway?Billo_Really said:Instead of being sarcastic and offering nothing new to the conversation, why don't you address the points being raised as reason for the impeachment. I mean, people are not making this stuff up.
icky said:Posted on Wed, Feb. 01, 2006
Administration backs off Bush's vow to reduce Mideast oil imports
By Kevin G. Hall
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic adviser said Wednesday that the president didn't mean it literally.
What the president meant, they said in a conference call with reporters, was that alternative fuels could displace an amount of oil imports equivalent to most of what America is expected to import from the Middle East in 2025.
But America still would import oil from the Middle East, because that's where the greatest oil supplies are.
He pledged to "move beyond a petroleum-based economy and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past."
Not exactly, though, it turns out.
"This was purely an example," Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said.
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwas...38.htm?source=rss&channel=krwashington_nation
(thanks Webhead)
Good. It's a step in the right (other left) direction.Originally posted by KCConservative:
Okay, I will address the point of impeachment. So how's that coming along, anyway?
So answer the question. How's the impeachment coming along?Billo_Really said:Good. It's a step in the right (other left) direction.
Slow.........Originally posted by KCConservative:
So answer the question. How's the impeachment coming along?
Stop lying to yourself.Originally posted by Lantzolot
If he's republican and president then the liberals will want him impeached, simply for being a republican.
You have no idea why Clinton was impeached do you...Mickeytrout11 said:Yeah. That is completely untrue.
And if it were true, then it would explain the Republican mindset during the Clinton presidency. "Impeach Clinton! Impeach Clinton!" For what? "For lying to the American people." Well, Bush just did so. So give up on that argument while you're still only that far behind.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?