I fully agree with you, just surprised - if abortion was common for dogs, wouldn't you have supported ending this life before given a chance?
If you have all the time and money in the world, you can 'save" just about anything. The question is, as always, should you?
If one can, then one should. Too many place too little value on life. It's not the puppy that gained the most from this effort.They said they did four 15 minute sessions a day. One hour is not "all the time in the world". If someone does heve the time, resources and inclination to help a puppy like this one, then the answer to your question is yes, absolutely, they should.
For some people, it's just too easy to see the bad side of things. Like Eeyore, they have a little black raincloud following them everywhere.
John, how many times have I gone over the whole bodily sovereignty concept with you? Do you still not get it?
Why am I not surprised you'd turn a puppy thread into yet another abortion sinkhole? If you are really having a hard time with this bodily sovereignty thing, please start a thread in the appropriate bog pit.
WHY CAN NO ONE JUST ENJOY THE PUPPIES!?
Just think, if it was aborted it wouldn't have had to go through any suffering.
As I said, it's a option. I wouldn't make a policy of it however.They said they did four 15 minute sessions a day. One hour is not "all the time in the world". If someone does heve the time, resources and inclination to help a puppy like this one, then the answer to your question is yes, absolutely, they should.
Actually, it is.If one can, then one should. Too many place too little value on life. It's not the puppy that gained the most from this effort.
Not by a long shot. The rewards from an act of goodness are often greater than the act itself, but they rarely come in the anticipated or expected way. An affirmation of the value of life is not limited to the life saved in this instance, and many others as well.Actually, it is.
Your warm and fuzzy view of life has been noted. All requests for donations from now on will include pictures of sad puppies in them.Not by a long shot. The rewards from an act of goodness are often greater than the act itself, but they rarely come in the anticipated or expected way. An affirmation of the value of life is not limited to the life saved in this instance, and many others as well.
I do have that view. It's the only life I have, and since I have a choice, I prefer that view rather than yours. Since it's in the news here today, maybe you can try photos of Putin without a shirt for your donation requests. They're not warm, or fuzzy. Good luck.Your warm and fuzzy view of life has been noted. All requests for donations from now on will include pictures of sad puppies in them.
Warm and fuzzy works better, that is easy to see.I do have that view. It's the only life I have, and since I have a choice, I prefer that view rather than yours. Since it's in the news here today, maybe you can try photos of Putin without a shirt for your donation requests. They're not warm, or fuzzy. Good luck.
It does. Wonder why? I would also note that I kill animals, too. I hunt and fish. I've never shot a deer without a tremendous feeling of respect and admiration for the animal and a sense of thankfulness that such an animal is here. They're tasty, too.Warm and fuzzy works better, that is easy to see.
Wow. You are pretty cynical. If it isn't costing you any money, or any time, why does it bother you so much?
As I said, it's a option. I wouldn't make a policy of it however.
I fully understand your bodily sovereignty position - I just find it somewhat ironic that a person who so adamantly supports aborting a growing child if that child has even the slightest abnormality or if the mother is so inclined, can then feign any kind of outrage or disbelief that another person may think that spending time and money treating and giving therapy to a puppy with physical abnormalities is a waste of both the time and money. It's remarkable you don't see that, but then that's your right just as it's my right to point out the inconsistencies I see.
I guess the best way for you to always be right and to never be challenged in your views would be to either start your own website or to stop posting here.
It's not about being bothered, it's not my money or time or effort being spent, it's logic. One dog that can never live a normal life is being saved while thousands are being euthanized in shelters across the country. Where is the time, money and effort best spent? You are only being emotional, we're trying to be logical. Sometimes, it's best to just let go.
What's a "normal" life for a dog? Dogs live a ton of different ways. This pup obviously has a lot of people caring for him which is more than many perfectly fine dogs have (which is incredibly sad). I know you're going to want to be all cold hearted in this thread and say any dog that needs any medical care should just be shot or something but the bottom line is if you don't give a **** about this pup, who cares? If it's not your time or money it's not your call.