• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Pre-emptive lawsuit challenges Bush plan (1 Viewer)

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The new detainee torture bill, which gives the president the right, under US law, to continue to violate the Geneva Conventions, if he so chooses, is already being challenged in a lawsuit.

If Congress is not going to protect our Constitution, then it is up to the Supreme Court to do so, and that they will.

Article is here.
 
danarhea said:
If Congress is not going to protect our Constitution, then it is up to the Supreme Court to do so, and that they will.

:2funny:

And as soon as interrogating, putting on trial, and even (gasp) detaining foreigners suspected of trying to mass murder Americans somehow begins to violate the Constitution, this statement will be something other than a laughably hysterical example of what I mean when I call liberals "constitutionally illiterate."
 
aquapub said:
:2funny:

And as soon as interrogating, putting on trial, and even (gasp) detaining foreigners suspected of trying to mass murder Americans somehow begins to violate the Constitution, this statement will be something other than a laughably hysterical example of what I mean when I call liberals "constitutionally illiterate."


I await someone to show me where the Geneva Convention applies to irregulars engaged in terrorism
 
TurtleDude said:
I await someone to show me where the Geneva Convention applies to irregulars engaged in terrorism

I thought they were unlawfull combatants :confused:

However, if they are irregulars committing terrorism in Iraq then they should be subject to Iraqi law and dealt with accordingly - same for Afghanistan.....unless of course terrorism, murder and the blowing up of innocents are not crimes in these countries. There is no need for such people to be in US custody period.

If any terrorists are caught in the US they should be tried and punished as per our laws here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom