Not at all. It simply does not follow that those who go to college can't be considered to have earned, rather than inherited, their wealth.
Latest polling has Hillary ahead by double digits. But you keep on insisting that reality is optional.
There is serious risk and loss in both courses of action. Certainly Trump has disqualified himself from being POTUS, and it is also true that he won with a smaller minority of GOP voters, making a case that he's not a party unity candidate. There is precedent - the party took similar steps to make sure that Teddy Roosevelt didn't remake the GOP in a progressive image in 1912.
As I understand it, it's not really a rewriting that's being proposed. Technically, every delegate with the exception of 1976 has been free - state laws do not bind private parties. It's just that, since 1976, with the exception of an attempt by the Paul people to make trouble in 2012, no one has done anything but considered themselves bound. If the delegates cannot, in good conscience, vote for a serial lying big government liberal authoritarian with decrepit moral character... things might get interesting.
He and his supporters spent the entire primary gleefully campaigning on the idea that they were rewriting the rules. It would be deliciously ironic if they fell by the same sword.
