• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Pork, pork and more pork...

oldreliable67

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
4,641
Reaction score
1,102
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Earmarks have become the drug of choice for politicians seeking re-election. From The Hill, comes this story about the current concoction of aphrodisiacs with which the pols are attempting seduction of the voting populace:


I guess we should be thankful for small things: I don't see any mention of 'bridges to nowhere' in there.
 
galenrox said:
Would it be unreasonable to make it an expectation that congresspeople obstain themselves from budget sections pertaining to their state, similar to how we expect judges to abstain from cases that they are personally involved with?

Seems reasonable, but I don't know if it would work. Congress is so corrupt that Congressman A would probably lobby for Congressman B's pork, and vice versa.

I suppose it couldn't hurt though.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…