• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pope endorses civil union laws for same-sex couples

Slartibartfast

Jesus loves you.
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
71,959
Reaction score
58,513
Location
NE Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This is being proposed as an alternative to marriage, but its a big step forward for the Catholic church.
 
It's a start.

He said something the other day about Jesus loving gays or something. And that parents should love their gay children. I'm too lazy to look it up.
 
It's a start.

He said something the other day about Jesus loving gays or something. And that parents should love their gay children. I'm too lazy to look it up.

He has been undermining gay hatred since the moment he became the pope.
 
This is being proposed as an alternative to marriage, but its a big step forward for the Catholic church.
The church will never marry LGBT people, just as they're refuse to marry people who are divorced (wink, nudge..... write a fat check) or who won't convert, so this is as good as it will ever be. A state issued marriage license is a civil union that applies to bother heterosexual and LGBT.
 
I think it's great...supporting them and their right to have families.

He recognizes that God would never be so cruel to create people attracted to the same sex and then deny them the same love and fulfillment as straight couples.

That any (most) religions ever misinterpreted God's Word to see homosexuality as a sin can not have been anything more than fallible men of the time's own homophobia. Let's fact it...such a mindset has been rampant among men all thru history, I'm sure those that thought they heard God's Word were not immune. Because God is not hateful.
 
It's a start.

He said something the other day about Jesus loving gays or something. And that parents should love their gay children. I'm too lazy to look it up.
I'm not sure about Catholics, but Protestant faiths have always said 'hate the sin, not the sinner' and have not endorsed denying gay kids ...or others...love.

Altho some of them did try that horrible brainwashing crap to force gay kids to 'switch' :(
 
This is going to be a mental knot for the pending SCOTUS nominee. She ran a school that did not allow gay teachers or children of gay couples.
 
This is being proposed as an alternative to marriage, but its a big step forward for the Catholic church.
It's a big step about a decade behind the rest of the world. The idea that there needs to be an alternatives to marriage and that this alternative is lesser than marriage seems to be his way of trying to wiggle around the issue.

He could sit on St Peter's chair and issue out and edict and it's like it came from God himself it's called ex cathedra. He doesn't. That should make clear his intent.
 
This is going to be a mental knot for the pending SCOTUS nominee. She ran a school that did not allow gay teachers or children of gay couples.
Some Catholics go thru all kinds of contortions and excuses to justify the most extremist of their doctrines. Like just declaring those that dont adhere are "not real Catholics." Like the pedo priests and those that covered it up 'arent real Catholics,' that using birth control means 'you're not a real Catholic,' like inventing the entire role of a Pope from nothing and declaring him "God's Messenger on Earth,' like then inventing other crap so that if they dont like what he says, they can deny his words too... :rolleyes: Good luck finding that in the Bible.
 
This is being proposed as an alternative to marriage, but its a big step forward for the Catholic church.
Basically what he is doing is recognizing that civil marriage and religious marriage are not the same. You can get married before the church and not be married before the state. Likewise, you can be married before the state, and not be married before the church. Neither is an alternative to the other. What labels they use is also irrelevant, because calling it a marriage or a union it is still the same thing. Civil marriage exists independent of religious marriage, especially since a marriage under one religion exists independent of marriage under a different religion.
 
This is being proposed as an alternative to marriage, but its a big step forward for the Catholic church.

This is nothing but a pope ignoring the Bible in his quest to troll for popularity for himself and the Catholic Church.
 
This is nothing but a pope ignoring the Bible in his quest to troll for popularity for himself and the Catholic Church.
How is he ignoring the Bible? Does the Bible say to force those outside its religion to follow it's morals?
 
How is he ignoring the Bible? Does the Bible say to force those outside its religion to follow it's morals?

It says nothing about using force.

But it doesn't say Christians should endorse and enable sin. Far from it. Christians are supposed to condemn sin. And according to the Bible, all sexual relations outside of a marriage between one man and one woman is a sin.
 
The Vatican coffers must be low. This pope (and I don't care for popes) has gone off the rails in about every way.
 
Ah yes. Here come the homophobic strict Republicans here to bash everyone who isn't an Evangelical Christian
 
It says nothing about using force.

But it doesn't say Christians should endorse and enable sin. Far from it. Christians are supposed to condemn sin. And according to the Bible, all sexual relations outside of a marriage between one man and one woman is a sin.
One can condemn a sin while still allowing for the legal ability of others to commit said sin. It can be argued that without the legal ability to commit a sin, then one is not choosing to abstain from it for spiritual reasons, but for earthly ones, rendering the lack of sin moot. Furthermore, Jesus himself allowed for people to follow their own ways and never called for anyone to condemn a person's legal ability to do something.
 
One can condemn a sin while still allowing for the legal ability of others to commit said sin. It can be argued that without the legal ability to commit a sin, then one is not choosing to abstain from it for spiritual reasons, but for earthly ones, rendering the lack of sin moot. Furthermore, Jesus himself allowed for people to follow their own ways and never called for anyone to condemn a person's legal ability to do something.
I'd like to know just does it affect anyone else that two consenting adults are married? Do these people walk around and demand to see the hands of any couple to inspect them for rings?

Do they also think that the couple cares whether they approve of their relationship because the same people who don't support LGBT marriages also probably don't have a high opinion of interracial or interfaith marriages either?

Nobody cares whether any church likes their relationship because they aren't seeking that approval either. The Christian religions don't control the definition of marriage is in the US, nor are all Christian religions in agreement on LGBT equality or even interracial marriage.
 
has the pope apologised for the horror inflicted on this world by his curch? Belief over evidence, hatred of women, stultification and rape of children, terifying chidern with the nonsense of hell? this is evil...beyond evil
 
It says nothing about using force.

But it doesn't say Christians should endorse and enable sin. Far from it. Christians are supposed to condemn sin. And according to the Bible, all sexual relations outside of a marriage between one man and one woman is a sin.
So? No one's forcing gay Christians to marry.
 
It says nothing about using force.

But it doesn't say Christians should endorse and enable sin. Far from it. Christians are supposed to condemn sin. And according to the Bible, all sexual relations outside of a marriage between one man and one woman is a sin.
That is a religious idea that cannot be enforced by the state as secular law unless you are willing to allow the state to force you to equally obey the dogma of every other religion due to the fact that all religions are to be treated as equals because of the 1st Amendment. Hindu cops arresting people eating beef. Muslim cops arresting people drinking alcohol and eating pork. Hasidic Jewish cops arresting every in cars on Friday night and Saturday because of their Sabbath. Buddhist cops arresting everyone eating meat, Christian scientist cops arresting people at the hospital or pharmacy, and pagan cops arresting anyone who doesn't obey the 8 Sabbats, Old order Amish cops arresting people in cars, or with electricity in their homes, and just a few of the more obvious religious rules that you would be forced to obey. Humanist cops arresting anyone at church/mosque/ holy places or those who are praying or with religious symbols. Satanist cops would be loads of laughs.

It sounds like fun, doesnt it?
 
Back
Top Bottom