Poll: Huge Support for Ann Coulter (1 Viewer)

[cold_mold]

A NewsMax.com poll featured on Voters Domain: http://www.votersdomain.com/article....d=6350&tid=103 found that Americans are not affected by Sen. Hillary Clinton's criticisms of Ann Coulter's new book "Godless:The Church of Liberalism." In fact, Coulter's book even topped New York Time's nonfiction list and Amazon.com's list of bestsellers.

Just goes to show that Clinton is not the opinion leader America is looking for.
Edit/Delete Message

 

[Caine]

A NewsMax.com poll featured on Voters Domain: http://www.votersdomain.com/article....d=6350&tid=103 found that Americans are not affected by Sen. Hillary Clinton's criticisms of Ann Coulter's new book "Godless:The Church of Liberalism." In fact, Coulter's book even topped New York Time's nonfiction list and Amazon.com's list of bestsellers.

Just goes to show that Clinton is not the opinion leader America is looking for.
Edit/Delete Message

Where you aware that Newsmax is a MAJORLY conservative news source?

I am not one bit surprised by this "poll"

I mean, have you seen how many advertisements for Ann Coulter are on thier homepage? How about all the articles, don't they seem to slant to the right to you?

Im certain you were aware, you were just trying to pass it off as an unbiased "fair and balanced" poll weren't you?

 

[Joby]

We4ll, just goes to show that smear politics are alive and well.

 

[talloulou]

Her book is #1 for nonfiction hardcover on the NY best seller list.

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/index.html

What that means I can not say though as I myself am highly entertained reading Michael Moore's dribble and I know some of the people who listened to Howard Stern the longest were the ones who hated him the most. :rofl

 

[Caine]

Her book is #1 for nonfiction hardcover on the NY best seller list.

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/index.html

What that means I can not say though as I myself am highly entertained reading Michael Moore's dribble and I know some of the people who listened to Howard Stern the longest were the ones who hated him the most. :rofl

Although I question the classification of the book as "non-fiction"

 

[aps]

When essentially half of voting America voted for this president, I am not surprised that her book is popular. It is clear to me that many people lack integrity.

Ann Coulter must be a lonely woman. I actually feel sorry for her. When I saw her on the Today show, she exuded hatred. She was shaking, she was so angry. Anyone who was secure with themselves would be able to express themselves intelligently, without resorting to the tactics she resorted to that day. I know some of that was drama so that her book would sell, but if you look at the content of her books, she is full of hate, and that is not something you can pretend. How pathetic.

 

[Caine]

When essentially half of voting America voted for this president, I am not surprised that her book is popular. It is clear to me that many people lack integrity.

Ann Coulter must be a lonely woman. I actually feel sorry for her. When I saw her on the Today show, she exuded hatred. She was shaking, she was so angry. Anyone who was secure with themselves would be able to express themselves intelligently, without resorting to the tactics she resorted to that day. I know some of that was drama so that her book would sell, but if you look at the content of her books, she is full of hate, and that is not something you can pretend. How pathetic.

She reminds me of a bowel movement I had one time.......
:toilet:

 

[talloulou]

I think like any "shock value" entertainer she clearly goes overboard sometimes but mostly I think she's funny. And on some topics she's dead on and I agree with her 100% like abortion.....Here are some quotes from her book. :rofl


"Moreover, if women are so pro-abortion why are virtually all abortionists men? If ever there was a need for a Take Our Daughters To Work Day, it's at the abortion mills."

"Lliberals are more upset when a tree is chopped down than when a child is aborted. Even if one rates an unborn child less than a full-blown person, doesn't the unborn child rate slightly higher than vegetation?"

"The Democrats need pro-life votes, but there's the small problem that they won't budge an inch on abortion. So they make crazy arguments for abortion, allowing not the tiniest restriction, while periodically pretending to have qualms about abortion. It's the most amazing spectacle, as if Ronald Reagan were slashing taxes talking about what a "sad, tragic choice" it is to cut taxes or giving speeches about how tax cuts should be "safe, legal, and rare." Except that even Reagan didn't have the gusto for cutting taxes that the Democrats have for ending human life."

 

[Captain America]

NewsMax......:rofl

Give the guy a break. He's only got 4 posts.

He probably has yet to realize he is treading in water way over his head yet so y'all be nice.

But you need to leave that lame **** at the doorstep next time you visit. Most members here have at least graduated from high school.

But it's cool. You're new here. We understand. We are very forgiving.

Welcome to Debate Politics. Darn glad to meet ya.:2wave:

 

[Captain America]

She reminds me of a bowel movement I had one time.......
:toilet:

That's strange. She reminds me of a bowel movement that I can't quite squeeze out.

Hidee-ho godless liberal!

 

[jfuh]

It's interesting to note how some will make a post clamoring over how great Ann Coulter or even using her book as reference material to make "arguments".

Yet not one of us on the other side of the isle makes any post in support or reference to material by the comedian Al Franklin, and the likes.

Then there's this constant -> Damn you liberals attitude.
I'm quite sick of this, if those of you have no other better argument except for "you retarded libearls are ruining everything" then get the hell out of here, seriously - note at the top of the pages? Civility a must. You should've noticed by now that playing partisan doesn't work?
Grow up and graduate from high school already.

 

[taxedout]

Damn you retarded liberals, you're ruining everything.
Get the hell out. :2party:

 

[aps]

I think like any "shock value" entertainer she clearly goes overboard sometimes but mostly I think she's funny. And on some topics she's dead on and I agree with her 100% like abortion.....Here are some quotes from her book. :rofl


"Moreover, if women are so pro-abortion why are virtually all abortionists men? If ever there was a need for a Take Our Daughters To Work Day, it's at the abortion mills."

"Lliberals are more upset when a tree is chopped down than when a child is aborted. Even if one rates an unborn child less than a full-blown person, doesn't the unborn child rate slightly higher than vegetation?"

"The Democrats need pro-life votes, but there's the small problem that they won't budge an inch on abortion. So they make crazy arguments for abortion, allowing not the tiniest restriction, while periodically pretending to have qualms about abortion. It's the most amazing spectacle, as if Ronald Reagan were slashing taxes talking about what a "sad, tragic choice" it is to cut taxes or giving speeches about how tax cuts should be "safe, legal, and rare." Except that even Reagan didn't have the gusto for cutting taxes that the Democrats have for ending human life."

Gawd she sounds pathetic and stupid.

 

[aps]

It's interesting to note how some will make a post clamoring over how great Ann Coulter or even using her book as reference material to make "arguments".

Yet not one of us on the other side of the isle makes any post in support or reference to material by the comedian Al Franklin, and the likes.

Then there's this constant -> Damn you liberals attitude.
I'm quite sick of this, if those of you have no other better argument except for "you retarded libearls are ruining everything" then get the hell out of here, seriously - note at the top of the pages? Civility a must. You should've noticed by now that playing partisan doesn't work?
Grow up and graduate from high school already.

Ahhh, jfuh, there is a method to this madness. Paul Krugman stated this in his editorial yesterday:

But if the real source of today's bitter partisanship is a Republican move to the right on economic issues, why have the last three elections been dominated by talk of terrorism, with a bit of religion on the side? Because a party whose economic policies favor a narrow elite needs to focus the public's attention elsewhere. And there's no better way to do that than accusing the other party of being unpatriotic and godless.

http://select.nytimes.com/2006/06/19/opinion/19krugman.html

And there you have it.

I wonder if Ann Coulter has a blow-up doll to keep her company on those lonely nights.

 

[talloulou]

It's interesting to note how some will make a post clamoring over how great Ann Coulter or even using her book as reference material to make "arguments".

Yet not one of us on the other side of the isle makes any post in support or reference to material by the comedian Al Franklin, and the likes.

How about all these....and if I had the time and inclination I'm sure I could drum up more.

I like Ed Schultz and Al Franken. They have been right while the ones listed haven't been right about anything yet.

Franken is usually very diligent about checking facts and admitting mistakes when he makes them.

I have. Al Franken named a book for the purpose of p!ss!ng off Bill O'Reilly and FOX News, and said so. Damn, did it ever work. They got so p!ssed off that they propelled his book to best seller...

You include Franken? I'm sorry, I actually legit like that guy...

:applaud Another lie brought to us by jfuh. Although I don't consider this an outright lie like your previous whopper so much as a simplistic statement you pulled out your rear with no regard for checking to see if it were actually true. Furthermore if I were to quote those who supported Mr. Michael Moore we could be here all day!

 

[talloulou]

Ahhh, jfuh, there is a method to this madness. Paul Krugman stated this in his editorial yesterday:

Krugman is in the same business....he's an editorialist who makes inflammatory statements to sell papers. He consistently blames everything bad going on in the world today on Bush and the Republican party. There is absolutely nothing wrong with liking columnists and authors like this but to suggest that the ones who are biased towards your political leaning have some type of moral high ground while the ones that lean the other way are lower life forms is just, in my opinion, silly.

"But the vitriol also reflects the fact that many of the people at the Republican National Convention, for all their flag-waving, hate America. They want a controlled, monolithic society; they fear and loathe our nation's freedom, diversity and complexity."-Paul Krugman

"Can we break the machine that is imposing right-wing radicalism on the United States? The scariest part is that the media is part of that machine."-
Paul Krugman

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/paul_krugman.html

All of these people are to some degree entertainers attempting to entertain likeminded folk with their opinions. Some are edgier than others but they're all making their money the same way....by reflecting back to us what we dislike about our political opponents. Some are wittier than others and some are way over the top so depending on your mood and preference you can find someone for you. Some people like clean comics and some people get a kick out of Dave Chapelle, Chris Rock, or Howard Stern. Coulter is outrageous in a way that turns many off. Moore is similar though it's more subtle and passive aggressive. Others, like Krugman, attempt to walk the line while trying to remain credible but they are all in the same business.....entertaining us with their opinions.

 

[PricoNy]

A NewsMax.com poll featured on Voters Domain: http://www.votersdomain.com/article....d=6350&tid=103 found that Americans are not affected by Sen. Hillary Clinton's criticisms of Ann Coulter's new book "Godless:The Church of Liberalism." In fact, Coulter's book even topped New York Time's nonfiction list and Amazon.com's list of bestsellers.

Just goes to show that Clinton is not the opinion leader America is looking for.
Edit/Delete Message

That's not the point... the point is , it just goes to show, no matter what political leaning you are , what you write and rant about, even if it's controversial ... good or bad publicity ... always turns out to be good publicity for the author, creator, producer...

An yes, I am liberal leaning Dem but that's besides the point... I can't stand the **** when conservatives play god damn victim and make everyone in America to be the victims of care free anything goes society cause it's the liberals fault that they don't hold up to traditional values .... people think differently, they learn, appreciate change, and become more open minded. It doesn't mean you surcome to total chaos ... when it's the will, sanity, and understanding of the individual that can determine the outcome of their lifestyle and environment. It's like being a liberal these days means your weak or wishy washy ... no, give me a freakin' break. Conversatives stick to something yea, but does it means the outcome will be correct ... do they think carefully about what the consequences could be... oh wait, why don't you ask George W. Bush and his croonies ... the neo cons in the White House. LOL

 

[aps]

Krugman is in the same business....he's an editorialist who makes inflammatory statements to sell papers. He consistently blames everything bad going on in the world today on Bush and the Republican party. There is absolutely nothing wrong with liking columnists and authors like this but to suggest that the ones who are biased towards your political leaning have some type of moral high ground while the ones that lean the other way are lower life forms is just, in my opinion, silly.

"But the vitriol also reflects the fact that many of the people at the Republican National Convention, for all their flag-waving, hate America. They want a controlled, monolithic society; they fear and loathe our nation's freedom, diversity and complexity."-Paul Krugman

"Can we break the machine that is imposing right-wing radicalism on the United States? The scariest part is that the media is part of that machine."-
Paul Krugman

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/paul_krugman.html

All of these people are to some degree entertainers attempting to entertain likeminded folk with their opinions. Some are edgier than others but they're all making their money the same way....by reflecting back to us what we dislike about our political opponents. Some are wittier than others and some are way over the top so depending on your mood and preference you can find someone for you. Some people like clean comics and some people get a kick out of Dave Chapelle, Chris Rock, or Howard Stern. Coulter is outrageous in a way that turns many off. Moore is similar though it's more subtle and passive aggressive. Others, like Krugman, attempt to walk the line while trying to remain credible but they are all in the same business.....entertaining us with their opinions.

Paul Krugman doesn't have the nastiness in him that Ann Coulter has. Sure he attacks republicans, but I don't see him display the hatred that she does. He displays passion, and he does it in an intelligent way. She doesn't know the meaning of constructively attacking the other party--she destructively attacks the other party, which is the sign of a weak and pathetic mind. Seriously. Michael Moore doesn't have half the intelligence that Paul Krugman has.

 

[taxedout]

Paul Krugman doesn't have the nastiness in him that Ann Coulter has. Sure he attacks republicans, but I don't see him display the hatred that she does. He displays passion, and he does it in an intelligent way. She doesn't know the meaning of constructively attacking the other party--she destructively attacks the other party, which is the sign of a weak and pathetic mind. Seriously. Michael Moore doesn't have half the intelligence that Paul Krugman has.

Key words : "but I don't see him"

 

[hipsterdufus]

Although I question the classification of the book as "non-fiction"

I suggest that when one frequesnts Borders and Barnes and Noble, to discreetly move Coulter's books to Sci-Fi where they belong.

No need to comment on a Newsmax poll.

Breaking news... Reality-based community thinks Dan Coltwhore is a hate hag.

 

[hipsterdufus]

Krugman is in the same business

Find me a Krugman quote where he calls for something as vile as:

assassination of a SCOUTS Judge
bombing of New York Times
Fragging of John Murtha

and on and on and on....

Coltwhore is your hero, I understand. Her minions will devour her new hate filled tome and blame all of the worlds problems on the (powerless) godless liberals.

It's a house of cards and has been falling since Terry Schiavo.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

Krugman is in the same business....he's an editorialist who makes inflammatory statements to sell papers. He consistently blames everything bad going on in the world today on Bush and the Republican party. There is absolutely nothing wrong with liking columnists and authors like this but to suggest that the ones who are biased towards your political leaning have some type of moral high ground while the ones that lean the other way are lower life forms is just, in my opinion, silly.

"But the vitriol also reflects the fact that many of the people at the Republican National Convention, for all their flag-waving, hate America. They want a controlled, monolithic society; they fear and loathe our nation's freedom, diversity and complexity."-Paul Krugman

"Can we break the machine that is imposing right-wing radicalism on the United States? The scariest part is that the media is part of that machine."-
Paul Krugman

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/paul_krugman.html

All of these people are to some degree entertainers attempting to entertain likeminded folk with their opinions. Some are edgier than others but they're all making their money the same way....by reflecting back to us what we dislike about our political opponents. Some are wittier than others and some are way over the top so depending on your mood and preference you can find someone for you. Some people like clean comics and some people get a kick out of Dave Chapelle, Chris Rock, or Howard Stern. Coulter is outrageous in a way that turns many off. Moore is similar though it's more subtle and passive aggressive. Others, like Krugman, attempt to walk the line while trying to remain credible but they are all in the same business.....entertaining us with their opinions.

The difference is that Krugman is an economist. You may disagree with him, but he is stating his opinions on fiscal policy that do have at least some grounding in the fact that he is an economist. The debate that he brings to the table is far more elevated than that of Coulters. I have never known of Krugman to accuse conservatives of being evil, or baby killers, or anything even remotely comparable to the kind of vile rehetoric regularly spewed by Coulter.

I have said this before and I will say it again. Coulter comes off as rather witty in her books, why is it though that in person when interviewed, she consistently makes an *** out of herself. Everytime the woman is in a round table with someone like Krugman, she makes a complete and utter fool of herself. Has it ever occurred to any of you guys that she is blinded by hate, and that if it were not for her editors, her books really would not be that witty or even coherent?

 

[faithful_servant]

When essentially half of voting America voted for this president, I am not surprised that her book is popular. It is clear to me that many people lack integrity.

Ann Coulter must be a lonely woman. I actually feel sorry for her. When I saw her on the Today show, she exuded hatred. She was shaking, she was so angry. Anyone who was secure with themselves would be able to express themselves intelligently, without resorting to the tactics she resorted to that day. I know some of that was drama so that her book would sell, but if you look at the content of her books, she is full of hate, and that is not something you can pretend. How pathetic.

More of that wonderful liberal tolerance we all miss so much. While I think that Ann is a publicity hound, at least she's pretty honest. If you compare her to someone like M. Moore, she's stands up as a pretty obnoxious, but at least honest person.

 

[ALiberalModerate]

More of that wonderful liberal tolerance we all miss so much. While I think that Ann is a publicity hound, at least she's pretty honest. If you compare her to someone like M. Moore, she's stands up as a pretty obnoxious, but at least honest person.

Amazing level of objectivity there. :roll: Coulter is no more honest than Moore, just like him, she hand picks the "facts" to fit her world view and omits anything that would challenge it. Half truths are the biggest lie of all.

 

[faithful_servant]

Paul Krugman doesn't have the nastiness in him that Ann Coulter has. Sure he attacks republicans, but I don't see him display the hatred that she does. He displays passion, and he does it in an intelligent way. She doesn't know the meaning of constructively attacking the other party--she destructively attacks the other party, which is the sign of a weak and pathetic mind. Seriously. Michael Moore doesn't have half the intelligence that Paul Krugman has.

As much as I despise M. Moore, the guy isn't dumb. In order to convince millions of Americans of the lies he spread, he had to be pretty smart. What amazes me is that liberals actually still admire the guy. It's a proven fact that he was hugely deceptive in his movies and made millions of dollars in doing, money that he took from liberals primarily. If someone lied to me and took my money, I'd be pretty ticked off, but the left just seems to fawn over him.