- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 45,404
- Reaction score
- 11,746
- Location
- Olympia Wa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You do realize Trump is also the elite?
for the 1000th time, he is a traitor to his class.
You do realize Trump is also the elite?
To the bolded:
It would be interesting to see this forum subset's marital histories ...
I vote from Mexico, I pay my taxes from Mexico, and I can laugh at Trumpkins and Clintonistas from Mexico. I am not only a U.S. Citizen but I am an American. We aren't required to live in Chicago or Detroit but can live where we choose.
Trump offers a chance to halt the decline of America into a leftist failure like Venezuela. This isn't an election America can afford to get wrong. 8 more years of leftist policies will destroy what is left of our economy. If you like what you see in Venezuela, move there.
It's kind of academic at this point in history.
You have just a few choices in November:
a. Vote for Trump
b. Vote for Hillary
c. Stay home (which is the same as voting for Hillary)
d. Vote for some noble 3rd party candidate (again, the same as voting for Hillary)
It's simple for me.
I am voting against Hillary.
The most effective way to do that is (at this juncture) is to vote for Donald Trump.
But to be fair, I would vote for a rheumy, fetid puddle of dog diarrhea before I would vote for the crooked, dishonest, contemptible Hillary Clinton.
:shock:
exactly, I have no clue why so many alleged Republicans or conservatives or even libertarians voted for Trump in the primary but in the main election, its the only choice I have
for the 1000th time, he is a traitor to his class.
Well at least U have not turned in your US Citizenship, because many have.
But I would not want to be a Mexican either.
I wish more U.S. citizens were Americans.
"Trump offers a chance to halt the decline of America into a leftist failure like Venezuela. This isn't an election America can afford to get wrong. 8 more years of leftist policies will destroy what is left of our economy. If you like what you see in Venezuela, move there."
So, we have an election coming up with possibly two liberal Democrats running representing the Liberal Democrats and the Republicans. Think back to what Barack Obama said to get elected and what he did when he got in office. It's a preview of Donald Trump. Donald is a liar and will say whatever he needs to say to get the presidency where he can run his personal wealth up close to what he's claimed it to be. He and Barack are both "uniters". "Hope and Change" and "Make America Great". Trump has two great interest, Donald Trump and money.
I find it fascinating how this works at DP... I say something hopefully intelligent on some random topic, and people respond on the subject of Trump.
He sure stirs people up.
Trump +1
"Well at least U have not turned in your US Citizenship, because many have.
But I would not want to be a Mexican either."
If this is what you said that you hoped was intelligent, then we found the problem.
Don't blame me. I voted for Rubio.
Eww. Rubio was Cruz with a smile.
THe first line is all fact, the second line is opinion based upon the fact that Mexico has extremely large problems, like for instance the government has long been fighting the drug lords for control of the place.
If you dont think what I said was intelligent then we for sure have located the problem.
Seriously.
I find it runny when liberal republicans try to scare conservatives into voting for a liberal like that.If you don't vote for our liberal republican,but instead vote 3rd party, stay at home or leave the ballot blank then the liberal democrat will win. I wonder if liberal democrats do the same do the same nonsense?Like a vote for Sanders is really a vote for Trump or staying at home,voting 3rd party or leaving that part of the ballot blank is really a vote for Trump.
Why People Love Trump: A Case Study of Milo Yiannopoulos - Harvard Political ReviewThe rise of Yiannopoulos can help to explain the rise of Donald Trump. Both have attracted followers that feel silenced, ignored, and invalidated by the left. Both will continue to receive sympathy and exposure if their opponents continue to aggressively and instinctually dismiss their views. And perhaps both can be defeated—or at least weakened—through respectful and empathic discourse. More broadly, the story of Yiannopoulos is useful to understand today’s political climate. There is an ever-growing number of Americans—liberals and conservatives—who feel like their voices are not being heard. Americans are increasingly identifying with their party, race, gender, or sexuality—and are judging the quality of an argument on the identity of the speaker. A political system established to encourage discourse and compromise has succumbed to partisan bickering. In order to save it, we may need to confront those we most disagree with, listen empathically, and fight the urge to silence or invalidate them. Perhaps we can start with Milo Yiannopoulos.
I know why a lot of people voted for him in the primary, he was the best choice among the Republican possibilities. He's now the best choice among the presumtive party nominees. None of that makes him a good choice, he's just the least bad choice.
He was NOT the best choice to win the general election in the GOP primary
.
I was just stating facts, as things stand right now.
Actually you weren't. You were stating opinion; poor ones at that.
If you were stating "facts", then somehow a vote for say...the libertarian candidate...would mean Hillary Clinton's vote total was "100" instead of "99". But that's not the case.
So no. Stating that voting 3rd party or staying home is a "vote for Hillary" is not "fact".
We disagree, my fine independent internet friend.
You can disagree all you want, it doesn't change facts.
A vote for someone would indicate an increase in the total numbers of votes for that person.
Someone staying home does not increase Hillary Clinton's vote total in any fashion.
Ergo, when speaking about facts, staying home is factually not a vote for Hillary Clinton.
All you're giving is your opinion, not a fact.
Saying that you believe it to be "as bad as voting for Clinton" or "essentially voting for Clinton" or any other such instance of you giving your interpretation of it's greater impact is reasonable, but all those are still giving your opinion.
The only FACT is that the only way to cast a vote for Hillary Clinton is to actually cast a vote for Hillary Clinton.
That is fact. As Rush Limbaugh says, Words have Meanings. You choosing to ignore those meanings is not a legitimate grounds for disagreement on that.