• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Politico Calls For Less Biden Adulation

Here are some more examples of Psaki and "how well she can do her job".



Hell, she couldn't even handle a softball from the press.


Ooops, I missed where she said that Joe Biden's inauguration crowd was the biggest in history period. Can you point that out?
 
Have you seen the Daily Press Briefings? It is clear why the press loves President Biden. They can do their jobs.
Do their job? Since when was “journalist” synonymous with puff ball pitcher? I haven’t heard of a tough question yet.
 
Do their job? Since when was “journalist” synonymous with puff ball pitcher? I haven’t heard of a tough question yet.
On the first day there was a question about the Hyde Amendment. I'd posit that you haven't listened to much of them. That's okay though, the Biden administration plans to have them 5 days a week. Just like the Obama administration and other previous administrations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMR
On the first day there was a question about the Hyde Amendment. I'd posit that you haven't listened to much of them. That's okay though, the Biden administration plans to have them 5 days a week. Just like the Obama administration and other previous administrations.
Doesn’t change the fact that most of the press corp are in the Dems back pocket. Five days a week just means more bullshit from the administration and more obsequious conformity from the press.
 
Doesn’t change the fact that most of the press corp are in the Dems back pocket. Five days a week just means more bullshit from the administration and more obsequious conformity from the press.
You prefer the djt model of the last four years?
 
You prefer the djt model of the last four years?
I prefer a press that reports facts and truth and neither worships nor hates the people they report on. Whichever model that is.
 
Doesn’t change the fact that most of the press corp are in the Dems back pocket. Five days a week just means more bullshit from the administration and more obsequious conformity from the press.
Since the majority of America lean Democratic, doesn't that seem fair?
 
Since the majority of America lean Democratic, doesn't that seem fair?
“Lean Democrat” :eek: Who told you that? Probably lies about other stuff, too. :LOL:
 
I think there needs to be MORE Biden adulation.

We control the MSM....and everything else
 
Since the majority of America lean Democratic, doesn't that seem fair?
"Fair" is not the same as "equitable." Thanks!!

One danger for Biden is that the electorate will come to view his call for unity as a mask for a partisan liberal agenda. There was little policy in the Inaugural Address, but the executive orders he is signing, and the legislation he is proposing to Congress, do not herald a future where the parties are reconciled to one another. His presidency might proceed along two tracks, with Biden standing as a symbol of comity and consensus while his administration sustains and expands the Democratic coalition. Biden might want to pay particular attention to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll showing that 55 percent of independents have “just some” or “no confidence” in his decision-making abilities. Letting Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have their way will not shrink that number.https: //www.nationalreview.com/2021/01/bidens-day/#slide-1
 
"Fair" is not the same as "equitable." Thanks!!

One danger for Biden is that the electorate will come to view his call for unity as a mask for a partisan liberal agenda. There was little policy in the Inaugural Address, but the executive orders he is signing, and the legislation he is proposing to Congress, do not herald a future where the parties are reconciled to one another. His presidency might proceed along two tracks, with Biden standing as a symbol of comity and consensus while his administration sustains and expands the Democratic coalition. Biden might want to pay particular attention to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll showing that 55 percent of independents have “just some” or “no confidence” in his decision-making abilities. Letting Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have their way will not shrink that number.https: //www.nationalreview.com/2021/01/bidens-day/#slide-1
Screw unity.


Just win
 
Here are some more examples of Psaki and "how well she can do her job".



Hell, she couldn't even handle a softball from the press.


That China question started with a false premise. The one term mistake never said that China was involved in genocide and you cannot find a quote where he did.
Trump told China's president that building concentration camps for millions of Uighur Muslims was 'exactly the right thing to do,' former adviser says.

In a private meeting during the 2019 G20 meeting in Japan, Trump and Xi were accompanied only by their interpreters, according to Bolton's book, parts of which were published in The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday.
Xi "explained to Trump why he was basically building concentration camps in Xinjiang," Bolton wrote, citing the interpreter's account. The interpreter added that "Trump said that Xi should go ahead with building the camps, which Trump thought was exactly the right thing to do," according to the book.
Bolton also wrote in the book that Matthew Pottinger, a retired US Marine and the current deputy national security adviser, "told me that Trump said something very similar during his November 2017 trip to China."
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-china-detention-camp-xinjiang-2020-6
 
"Fair" is not the same as "equitable." Thanks!!

One danger for Biden is that the electorate will come to view his call for unity as a mask for a partisan liberal agenda. There was little policy in the Inaugural Address, but the executive orders he is signing, and the legislation he is proposing to Congress, do not herald a future where the parties are reconciled to one another. His presidency might proceed along two tracks, with Biden standing as a symbol of comity and consensus while his administration sustains and expands the Democratic coalition. Biden might want to pay particular attention to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll showing that 55 percent of independents have “just some” or “no confidence” in his decision-making abilities. Letting Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have their way will not shrink that number.https: //www.nationalreview.com/2021/01/bidens-day/#slide-1
The first order of business is to undo the damage the one term mistake as done to this country. I guess you misinterpreted what Biden said about "unity". He did not mean unity behind the failed policies of Mr. One and done. He meant a bipartisan push to move forward once the damage is repaired. Also you cannot even think of complaining about Biden's EO''s after the abuse the last President did with that power. Biden is far from done with using that power to bring this country back from the dead.
 
I prefer a press that reports facts and truth and neither worships nor hates the people they report on. Whichever model that is.

Trump went out of his way to be "hated" by the media, he did everything he could so they would hate him. He used it as a badge of honor and a campaign tool.
 
Trump went out of his way to be "hated" by the media, he did everything he could so they would hate him. He used it as a badge of honor and a campaign tool.
So true. You wouldn't think his followers would be so dumb as to believe him.
 
I predict Psaki won't last long.

Here, the press blind sided her with a question she wasn't prepared for. (She's not even a very good tap dancer.)


McEnany would have just lied, would that suit you?
 
Finally. Someone sick and tired of the media reenacting Meg Ryan in When Harry Met Sally over Biden.

Ah but you are wrong - she was only faking the orgasm.
 
Letting Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have their way will not shrink that number.https: //www.nationalreview.com/2021/01/bidens-day/#slide-1
It might interest you to know that Pelosi and Shumer head a coequal branch of government. Biden has no authority over them. What he will do is work with him. That is how the government is supposed to run, with everyone working together for the betterment of the country. If statements like the above are coming out of the National Review, it has deteriorated along with the Republican Party.
 
Back
Top Bottom