Politicians Rejecting Election Results

[Grizzly Adams]

She copied what Trump did.

Two years before he did it?

Neat trick.

 

[NOVA66]

Two years before he did it?

Neat trick.

Who did?

 

[watsup]

Seems these people are taking a page from their former leader and are just sore losers

****en idiots

Indicted, Pro-Trump Election Official Refuses to Concede Race She Finished Third In​

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election official under indictment for breaching voting machines, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

“We didn’t lose, we just found evidence of more fraud … they’re cheating and we’ll prove it once again,” Peters said on Tuesday after finishing third in her GOP primary.

Peters is under criminal indictment for her role in allowing an unauthorized person to tamper with election equipment during the 2020 presidential election while serving as Mesa County’s Clerk and Recorder.

Peters has long been a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump’s debunked allegations that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Peter’s indictment stems from her participation in a plot to try and break into election machines under her supervision and copy data from them to prove fraud — instead voter information from the machines appeared online in August 2021, published in part by QAnon-affiliated conspiracy theorists like Ron Watkins.

Tina Peters, Pro-Trump Election Denier, Refuses to Concede

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

www.mediaite.com

Crazies. In other words, the Republican Party.

 

[NOVA66]

Two years before he did it?

Neat trick.

Did she have thugs storm the capital like trump did?

 

[Grizzly Adams]

Did she have thugs storm the capital like trump did?

If she didn't, would that mean she didn't reject election results?

 

[NOVA66]

If she didn't, would that mean she didn't reject election results?

No it means she did not try to overthrow the election like trump did.

 

[Grizzly Adams]

No it means she did not try to overthrow the election like trump did.

...and?

 

[NOVA66]

...and?

and what?

 

[NOVA66]

How would the republicans reacted if Al Gore did what Trump did when he lost?

 

[Grizzly Adams]

and what?

And what is your point?

 

[NOVA66]

And what is your point?

I answered your question.

 

[Grizzly Adams]

I answered your question.

Your answer doesn't explain why anyone should care whether she ordered people to storm a capitol building, when it comes to the question of whether she rejected election results.

 

[NOVA66]

Your answer doesn't explain why anyone should care whether she ordered people to storm a capitol building, when it comes to the question of whether she rejected election results.

If she didn't, would that mean she didn't reject election results?

No she may have rejected the election but she did not try to overthrow the election like trump did.

 

[Grizzly Adams]

No she may have rejected the election but she did not try to overthrow the election like trump did.

Insofar as this thread is concerned, so what?

 

[Minerva]

They're just following the Democrats' lead.

View attachment 67405129
"I CANNOT CONCEDE!"

Wasn't there an over/under bet wagered on this?

 

[Minerva]

Insofar as this thread is concerned, so what?

It shows that some people have the ability to disagree with an election outcome and not drive our nation up on the rocks.

 

[NOVA66]

Insofar as this thread is concerned, so what?

Yes so what

 

[Grizzly Adams]

Wasn't there an over/under bet wagered on this?

Congratulations, you correctly predicted a reference would be made to a similar situation.

Bravo!

 

[Grizzly Adams]

It shows that some people have the ability to disagree with an election outcome and not drive our nation up on the rocks.

Abrams' rejection of election results was different because nobody believed her?

 

[Grizzly Adams]

Yes so what

You're the one who said it, shouldn't you know?

 

[fmw]

Seems these people are taking a page from their former leader and are just sore losers

****en idiots

Indicted, Pro-Trump Election Official Refuses to Concede Race She Finished Third In​

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election official under indictment for breaching voting machines, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

“We didn’t lose, we just found evidence of more fraud … they’re cheating and we’ll prove it once again,” Peters said on Tuesday after finishing third in her GOP primary.

Peters is under criminal indictment for her role in allowing an unauthorized person to tamper with election equipment during the 2020 presidential election while serving as Mesa County’s Clerk and Recorder.

Peters has long been a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump’s debunked allegations that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Peter’s indictment stems from her participation in a plot to try and break into election machines under her supervision and copy data from them to prove fraud — instead voter information from the machines appeared online in August 2021, published in part by QAnon-affiliated conspiracy theorists like Ron Watkins.

Tina Peters, Pro-Trump Election Denier, Refuses to Concede

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

www.mediaite.com

Sounds like a sore loser to me. Worth ignoring. Concession isn't necessary. The election results are what matter. Life goes on.

 

[Perotista]

Seems these people are taking a page from their former leader and are just sore losers

****en idiots

Indicted, Pro-Trump Election Official Refuses to Concede Race She Finished Third In​

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election official under indictment for breaching voting machines, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

“We didn’t lose, we just found evidence of more fraud … they’re cheating and we’ll prove it once again,” Peters said on Tuesday after finishing third in her GOP primary.

Peters is under criminal indictment for her role in allowing an unauthorized person to tamper with election equipment during the 2020 presidential election while serving as Mesa County’s Clerk and Recorder.

Peters has long been a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump’s debunked allegations that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Peter’s indictment stems from her participation in a plot to try and break into election machines under her supervision and copy data from them to prove fraud — instead voter information from the machines appeared online in August 2021, published in part by QAnon-affiliated conspiracy theorists like Ron Watkins.

Tina Peters, Pro-Trump Election Denier, Refuses to Concede

Tina Peters, the controversial pro-Trump election, lost her bid for Colorado secretary of state on Tuesday – although she denies it.

www.mediaite.com

I think this is the new norm.

 

[Blue Dog]

This is SOP for the Republican Party.

It’s a perfect gambit for the reactionary voting bloc. Never concede a lost election. By further undermining the entire process it keeps the base fired up and frothing till the next election…

 

[BlueTex]

14th amendment, baby...

 

[Helix]