• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:583] Political Compass Thread

Can you offer any evidence to counter that label? He's been in favor of coercive government action in law and order, the military, and drug policy. And now he's considering forcibly overruling voters in Colorado and Washington.

Economically he extended the Bush tax cuts, has appointed plenty of wall street types, and, with the exception of a minuscule, corporate-targeted "stimulus," done nothing to help the plight of the poor, much less changed the fundamental relationships of production, the goal that defines any and every form of leftist thought.
 
That's very close to where my red spot lands. I'm one square to the right of you.

How are you a centrist then .... you're on the libertarian left with me.
 
pcgraphpng.php
 
It shows me as a "Left Libertarian," but some of the questions were just stupid and unanswerable. That, and you MUST agree or disagree; you can't be neutral or explain that you can't fully agree/disagree. For example:

"You cannot be moral without being religious."

Both morality and religion are figments of the imagination, so how am I supposed to answer one or the other?

"Some people are naturally unlucky."

Luck doesn't exist. Chance does.


Anywho, here's my results:

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.82
 
I've taken this test numerous times over the past few years, and I redid this just recently. In my experience, the test has always tended to give results to the left/down from where the person should probably be.

Economic Left/Right: 5.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.69

Votes Republican

ENTJ
 
Here's mine. I identify as a pacifist socialist, bordering on anarcho-pacifist. I'm definitely libertarian left. I also scored a strong INFP on the Myers-Briggs test, but I'm highly skeptical of those types of tests.
 

Attachments

  • pcgraphpng.php.jpg
    pcgraphpng.php.jpg
    9.9 KB · Views: 128
pcgraphpng.php


Economic Left/Right: -3.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87

I sit on the same square as Jill Stein and the Dalai Lama.
 
I also scored a strong INFP on the Myers-Briggs test, but I'm highly skeptical of those types of tests.

The tests are definitely complete bull****. If you really want to know your type, do research on the cognitive functions yourself. It is somewhat of a pseudo-science, but a recent study showed that parts of the brain actually correlate with different functions. Authors@Google: Dario Nardi - Neuroscience of Personality - YouTube

Anywho, here's my test results:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-4.38&soc=-4.67
 
It seems like a lot of people end up on the lower-left end of this scale. I think it may be skewed in that direction.
 
political compass.jpg



Though, to be serious, the questions on the test are kind of, well... bad.

"Do you think astrology accurately explains most things?"

"Do you think your race is superior to most others?"

Seriously? :screwy
 
Last edited:
me.jpg

Though I don't entirely trust that test as a lot of the questions are stupid.
 
Yes. I see myself as a classical conservative.

I believe in the old adage that says "Conservatism is the worship of dead radicals" and believe that the primary difference between conservatism and liberalism is their frame of reference. Conservatives judge all new policy through the lens of history while liberals judge all new policy through the lens of posterity.
 
Economic Left/Right: -7.87
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.12

Very close to the beloved Comrade Stalin.
 
Economic Left/Right: -7.87
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.12

Very close to the beloved Comrade Stalin.

Stalin is too rude and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a Secretary-General. That is why I suggest the comrades think about a way of removing Stalin from that post and appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Stalin in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite, and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc. This circumstance may appear to be a negligible detail. But I think that from the standpoint of safeguards against a split, and from the standpoint of what I wrote above about the relationship between Stalin and Trotsky, it is not a detail, or it is a detail which can assume decisive importance.

Lenin, 25 December 1922

[Source: Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 36 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1966), pp. 594-596.]
 
20x27.gif
c42.gif
n52.gif
Pretty close to where I thought I would be.
 
political compass.jpg

That's about right. Fairly liberal socially, pretty conservative fiscally, leaning more libertarian on size of government.
 
here's mine.

pcgraphpng.jpg
 
31x32.gif


No surprises here. Although I had to press "neutral" a lot - when I really meant "stupid question" or "it depends".
 
Back
Top Bottom