- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 69,343
- Reaction score
- 52,509
- Location
- Best Coast Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
58 (1) Subject to subsection (4), a motion for confirmation of a declaration of emergency, signed by a minister of the Crown, together with an explanation of the reasons for issuing the declaration and a report on any consultation with the lieutenant governors in council of the provinces with respect to the declaration, shall be laid before each House of Parliament within seven sitting days after the declaration is issued.
Only 1 major demonstration remains - Ottawa - Coutts will be gone but keeping the border open is addressed in EA.It only the police could have have actually done their jobs, then it would not be a problem.
What do you mean by "could have"? Do you mean could have or do you mean would have been willing to do what Trudeau expected them to, police and towing companies?It only the police could have have actually done their jobs, then it would not be a problem.
We have never seen such a protest as is happening in Ottawa and border crossingsSo unfortunate it came to this. I hope there is a serious post mortem after the dust settles.
YES, it certainly does!!!!!!! Oh Canada and its new very heavy hammer! I think this is truly unbelievable.This EA has severe penalties for violations
No looting, no shootings, no setting of numerous fires.YES, it certainly does!!!!!!! Oh Canada and its new very heavy hammer! I think this is truly unbelievable.
It is not the first time it was ever used. It used to be called the War Measures Act and was invoked ironically enough by Trudeau's father. But you are right in that is quite rare.Wow, he sure did - first time ever used!
The October Crisis would like a word.Wow, he sure did - first time ever used!
YES, it certainly does!!!!!!! Oh Canada and its new very heavy hammer! I think this is truly unbelievable.
Rather than listen to you yammer on and on for days and tons of comments about this - as you did with the US having the "exact" same border trucker requirements as Canada (which was wrong), we'll make it real clear. This is from the link in comment #4. This thread is about the Emergencies Act, not the earlier War Measures Act. According to this chief legal analyst, this is the first time it has been used.It is not the first time it was ever used. It used to be called the War Measures Act and was invoked ironically enough by Trudeau's father. But you are right in that is quite rare.
Well, that was special.Rather than listen to you yammer on and on for days and tons of comments about this -
That's not good. Glad they were caught before anything happened.PM announces Emergencies Act. Replaced the War Measure act, used in the FLQ crisis and Oka
Becomes legally valid from time it is issued
7 days later, Parliament if sitting both Houses must approve
If Parliament is prorogued, Parliament to be recalled within 7 days to vote on EA
Can be used for procuring services, such as tow trucks, to designating areas to be free from protests and much more.
Coutts border crossing weapons, large quantity of ammo and some body armor seized with
11 arrested
Alberta RCMP arrest 13 people at Coutts border blockade, seize weapons
Alberta RCMP officers have arrested 13 people and seized a number of weapons including guns and body armour near the Coutts border crossing blockade.calgary.ctvnews.ca
Interesting article on why the Govt would if requested by the AG of Ontario to provide military assistance, would provide the military assistance to OntarioIt is not the first time it was ever used. It used to be called the War Measures Act and was invoked ironically enough by Trudeau's father. But you are right in that is quite rare.
A Constitutional compromise drafted based upon the US Civil WarBut if such request is made, the federal government would have a “constitutional obligation” to respond, said Christian Leuprecht, a professor at Queen’s University and the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ont.
Why does this power exist?
As Leuprecht explained, this stems from a “compromise” crafted at the dawn of Confederation, when negotiators for the British colonies that initially formed Canada got together in the mid 1860s. At the time there was disquiet over the existence of sub-national militias, inspired by the horrors of the U.S. civil war. There were also concerns about religious and linguistic divisions in the nascent country of Canada, Leuprecht said, including between French and English speakers.
So instead of getting the authority to raise their own armies, the new provinces were promised — via the Militia Act of 1868 — that the national military would be there to help them if they requested it, Leuprecht said.
That power persists today in the National Defence Act.
“That’s the constitutional compromise,” he said. “We didn’t want the provincial premiers who would have their own militias.”
Wow...page after page of rather personal attacks.Rather than listen to you yammer on and on for days and tons of comments about this - as you did with the US having the "exact" same border trucker requirements as Canada (which was wrong), we'll make it real clear.
IIRC same in Ottawa a few weapons were confiscated, charges laid and suchThat's not good. Glad they were caught before anything happened.
I don't know how you feel about Beau, but a couple days ago he was talking about a group involved in the protests that may explain these armed people.So unfortunate it came to this. I hope there is a serious post mortem after the dust settles.
Well for the most part Americans have no idea of our history, laws,Constitution, Charter of Rights, Supreme Court that we try to help by providing the basic facts behind the laws, or Rights.Rather than listen to you yammer on and on for days and tons of comments about this - as you did with the US having the "exact" same border trucker requirements as Canada (which was wrong), we'll make it real clear. This is from the link in comment #4. This thread is about the Emergencies Act, not the earlier War Measures Act. According to this chief legal analyst, this is the first time it has been used.
"Aron Solomon, a chief legal analyst for Esquire Digital, in Montreal, Canada told Insider this is the first time the Emergencies Act was used. The Act replaced The War Measures Act, which had previously been invoked during the 1970 October Crisis. Solomon said the Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act so it could align with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which came in 1982. "
Looks like his mind is on the Durham/Hillary news tonight.Tucker will be in overdrive tonight!
That is hugely interesting. Never knew that, thanks.A Constitutional compromise drafted based upon the US Civil War
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?