One of the most important tasks is to express all false thought processes so characteristically that the reader says, “Yes, that’s exactly the way I meant it”. To make a tracing of the physiognomy of every error. Indeed we can only convict someone else of a mistake if he acknowledges that this really is the expression of his feeling. For only if he acknowledges it as such, is it the correct expression.
So any specific discussion topic on Wittgenstein? There are entire textbooks and PhD theses written about his work. Might help to narrow it down.
Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was an Austrian philosopher who worked primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language. From 1929 to 1947, Wittgenstein taught at the University of Cambridge.
There are entire textbooks and PhD theses written about his work.
A place to discuss philosophical matters free from those relying on faith in the divine, scripture, or other religious basis.
Richard Rorty (1931–2007) developed a distinctive and controversial brand of pragmatism that expressed itself along two main axes. One is negative – a critical diagnosis of what Rorty takes to be defining projects of modern philosophy. The other is positive – an attempt to show what intellectual culture might look like, once we free ourselves from the governing metaphors of mind and knowledge in which the traditional problems of epistemology and metaphysics (and indeed, in Rorty’s view, the self-conception of modern philosophy) are rooted. The centerpiece of Rorty’s critique is the provocative account offered in Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979, hereafter PMN). In this book, and in the closely related essays collected in Consequences of Pragmatism (1982, hereafter CP), Rorty’s principal target is the philosophical idea of knowledge as representation, as a mental mirroring of a mind-external world. Providing a contrasting image of philosophy, Rorty has sought to integrate and apply the milestone achievements of Dewey, Hegel and Darwin in a pragmatist synthesis of historicism and naturalism. Characterizations and illustrations of a post-epistemological intellectual culture, present in both PMN (part III) and CP (xxxvii–xliv), are more richly developed in later works, such as <<< truncated >>>
Our method resembles psychoanalysis in a certain sense. To use its way of putting things, we could say that a simile at work in the unconscious is made harmless by being articulated. And this comparison with analysis can be developed even further.
This intriguing conversation reminds me of a Thomas Campbell lecture for some reason:
Sadly, my study of philosophy is quite spotty, but I am eager to read and learn more from both of you, medi and ataraxia.
I confess to some confusion over which Thomas Campbell you are referring to? Thank you.
EDIT: WAIT. My browser only just showed me that was a link to YouTube when I saw the URL in the post I did here. I guess I can find the answer myself. This browser plays tricks on me like that.
And I am interested in this paragraph:
Just realized what this unusual style is that I am using this morning --- I'm cheating. I honestly hadn't realized that as I was typing that post above. I'm sort of rushing this thought process and asking for your help instead of helping myself and doing the proper homework. That means I am cheating. Hope I'll be forgiven.
Hang in there.
Perhaps you should consider a reset - clear out the cobwebs that are vexing you.
I woke up yesterday morning in a funk, don't remember a dream or a reason, but after a few mischievous and juvenile MAGA posts which often buoy me, nothing.
Think I'll go camping today, take a few days off from all of this.
You are forgiven. I will be, too, with any luck.
There are ways to combat growing old...
I'm afraid the cobwebs are not the sort that can be cleared out. Sort of like some memories that just cannot be put on any back shelf, in a manner of trying to explain. One problem is I remain vexed by many things.
One example, and relates to this topic, I think the Internet and the communications we engage in because of the Internet, are eventually going to be harmful to the human race.
Funny, though, even if I am somehow able to prove that, can I then cause it to halt?
I still remember my wife when she was dragged into a very nasty situation I had created with a very powerful institution's director and was challenging a thought process he was using to avoid addressing a safety issue, she pretty much told me to chill out and just get into retirement mode and don't fret and - - - well, sort of dig a kind of foxhole and climb in and get on with this getting dead due to age thing. I can't do that.
And that was about a year before I decided to use this Community to study modern day U.S. politics, which has me even more vexed. It started me with worries for my country, but then I realized it is a problem for the entire human race.
By the way, I have done my share of camping when younger. Taught my wife that style way back. Had a friend and I face down a bear once when on a camping trip. Not a big one, but still it probably could have done me damage, as I was at the front on that trail. Lucky for me that bear was not so interested in a couple weird animals maybe it called a human. Don't know bear language. Did a camp thing on my trial walk of the Tama River from Ogouchi Dam down to Tokyo Bay. That was a VFW project for charity. Yep, have a number of camping events behind me. Few in the States. And one or two in the ROK. And that isn't including bivouac during training exercises and field operations on duty assignments. Try doing a night of sleep in a CH-47 out on a very, very cold airfield because of a special alert. No time for preparing - - - just get your butt out there and no complaining. You are causing memories to kick in.
Stay safe on that camping trip. Have you ever eaten snake meat? Have to cook it a long time for it to be soft enough to chew. Here we have to worry about the tanuki animal as they love to steal stuff and run away. Not sure what those are called in English. Wait, Professor GS can help --- Japanese raccoon dog. And now I remember the raccoon is also trouble over there on your side of the Pond. Sneaky type little critter.
I'm rambling now. Sorry.
About 'the internet and communications we engage in because of the internet eventually being harmful to the human race', there is no doubt, but I warrant that began long, long ago with language, which eventually led to writing, which eventually led to the printing press and so on to the internet.
Nevertheless, suffering, i.e. being harmed, is endemic to the human race, and our suffering began long before we ever invented language which, of course, led to the internet.
And me sleeping on a CH-47 during a special alert? Since I know what both special and alert means, that would never happen, ever... unless I thought I could get away with it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?