No it isn't.Terrorism is a constant with the democrats.
No we don't.The democrats try to effect political change through fear.
There are no "demagoguery" attacks happening against Hegseth from us Democrats.These demagoguery attacks such as the one being waged against Hegseth.
That isn't true at all.]The tactic is to create fear and dread in anyone that would oppose the agenda of the democrats that they will be utterly defamed and destroyed by the full weight of the party and the corrupt press who will relentlessly slander and defame them.
You are so wrong about what we Democrats do.Terrorism is the proper and correct term for what democrats do.
I did not suggest it wasn't. However several posters have indicated that the Senate should simply rubberstamp Trump's choices. Which is what I thought was what you were supporting when you saidWhat Senate function is not happening? I can answer that for you - none, because the Senate is busy doing their job with these nominees. These nominees are meeting with senators right now and going through the regular process. The Senate's "key" role (not roll) is underway.
The Constitution is very clear. The Senate is the body who advises and consents on high level nominations. To suggest Senators should rubberstamp Trump's nominations is a step towards moving power from the legesislative branch to Trump. Posters here have even suggested Senators who cross Trump should be punished.....punished for doing their job.All of them are Trump's choice and should be Trump's choice
By insisting the Senate should automatically approve Trump's picksWho is ignoring the Constitution and in what manner are they doing so?
If I had a dollar for every time I heard a friend say that, well, I would be a millionaire.
You are just twisting using a "several posters" tactic without specific quotes. Then you twisted further by saying, "Which is what I thought was what you were supporting".I did not suggest it wasn't. However several posters have indicated that the Senate should simply rubberstamp Trump's choices. Which is what I thought was what you were supporting when you said
The Constitution is very clear. The Senate is the body who advises and consents on high level nominations. To suggest Senators should rubberstamp Trump's nominations is a step towards moving power from the legesislative branch to Trump. Posters here have even suggested Senators who cross Trump should be punished.....punished for doing their job.
It's my understanding that it is against forum rules to post quotes from people not engaged on a thread or conversation and I wasn't going hunting for them, then double checking but there most certainly have been many posts saying the nominations should be rubberstamped and Senators punished if they don't .You are just twisting using a "several posters" tactic without specific quotes. Then you twisted further by saying, "Which is what I thought was what you were supporting".
Who are you talking about and what "insisting" do you mean? Do you have a source, quotes, anything? Has something illegal or in violation of the Constitution occurred - and if so, what?By insisting the Senate should automatically approve Trump's picks
I'd have to research history to know about Trump's predecessors, but it sure looks like this cabinet process is happening at an extremely rapid pace.I don't think Hegseth is going to make it.
I wonder if Trump can put a cabinet together by inauguration day.
I made nothing up and certainly never said the process wasn't, being followed. Please stop your baseless accusations and misrepresentations of what I post.You are the one writing comments discussing the Constitution not being followed (fabricated obsessed TDS narrative?). Trump, on the other hand, is doing exactly what he should be, and the Senate is doing exactly what they should be. Your pot stirring over your made-up narrative doesn't apply to the reality of the process actually underway, Callen.
I'd have to research history to know about Trump's predecessors, but it sure looks like this cabinet process is happening at an extremely rapid pace.
Once more......I did not suggest that any violation of the Constitution occurred or the process wasn't being followed. That is an untrue statement. I only said there are those saying Trump's choices should not be challenged which is an abdication of Senatorial responsibility to the Executive.Who are you talking about and what "insisting" do you mean? Do you have a source, quotes, anything? Has something illegal or in violation of the Constitution occurred - and if so, what?
Trump isn't doing what he should be doing. He should have set a vetting process in place before he nominated some of these people. He is holding people with questionable histories up to embarrassment and he is requiring the Senate to do his vetting for him--wasting time and money.You are just twisting using a "several posters" tactic without specific quotes. Then you twisted further by saying, "Which is what I thought was what you were supporting".
The nominees are Trump's choice. After he makes them, the Senate begins their process. If they don't confirm someone, the nominee again becomes Trump's choice.
You are the one writing comments discussing the Constitution not being followed (fabricated obsessed TDS narrative?). Trump, on the other hand, is doing exactly what he should be, and the Senate is doing exactly what they should be. Your pot stirring over your made-up narrative doesn't apply to the reality of the process actually underway, Callen.
The nominations are going quickly. We'll see how the advise and consent process moves along.Like everything else about Mr. Trump, it's in flux.
of course its true
the problem is Republicans not sipporting Gaetz and Hegseth. Democrats aee irrelevant.
lies.
The constitution gives the senate the power to confirm, or not.
My party is in the minority. Irrelevant. Republicans are the ones scuttling appointments not the democrats.
It really seems like you dont understand that
I have faith in President Elect Trump's choices, but I've already said that if he doesn't get confirmed, I'd be okay with Ron DeSantis.
Just like his picks for the SC are his alone to make.You are just twisting using a "several posters" tactic without specific quotes. Then you twisted further by saying, "Which is what I thought was what you were supporting".
The nominees are Trump's choice. After he makes them, the Senate begins their process. If they don't confirm someone, the nominee again becomes Trump's choice.
Exactly. Did we both misinterpret this comment? I don't think so. It's crystal clear what Callen has implied.You are the one writing comments discussing the Constitution not being followed (fabricated obsessed TDS narrative?). Trump, on the other hand, is doing exactly what he should be, and the Senate is doing exactly what they should be. Your pot stirring over your made-up narrative doesn't apply to the reality of the process actually underway, Callen.
The devotion to Trump and willingness to ignore the Constitution is worrisome. More worrisome is that they don't seem to realize that is what they are doing,
Looks like he will. President Trump has again reaffirmed his support for Pete Hegseth ignoring the attempts of the slimy anti-Trump media and their dutiful lackeys to "Kavanaugh" him.DeSantis needs to stay where he is. He is Chief Executive of one of the most important states in the union.
I heard and read DeSantis and Trump are going to the Army/Navy game together next weekend. Knowing they aren't buddies who regularly hang out together, that seems somewhat interesting. If Hegseth becomes Sec of Defense, I wonder if Trump might have other ideas Trump wants to discuss with DeSantis?Looks like he will. President Trump has again reaffirmed his support for Pete Hegseth ignoring the attempts of the slimy anti-Trump media and their dutiful lackeys to "Kavanaugh" him.
Gaetz for senate maybe?I heard and read DeSantis and Trump are going to the Army/Navy game together next weekend. Knowing they aren't buddies who regularly hang out together, that seems somewhat interesting. If Hegseth becomes Sec of Defense, I wonder if Trump might have other ideas Trump wants to discuss with DeSantis?
Don't you think Trump might want Lara Trump in that spot more than he'd want Gaetz in it?Gaetz for senate maybe?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?