No problem, I didnt originally coin the "ethnotribalist" term. Its a term that is being used by sociologists to accurately describe the intentionally divisive and purely superficial, segregationist, racial/ethnic/gender/ "grievance" politics of the "progressive" movement. Its why some refer to the new leftist strategy as "cultural Marxism", because they've largely replaced the poor(proletariat) versus wealthy(bourgeois) dynamic, because we have a huge, mostly content middle class, whereas 1918 Russia didnt!
So, theyve pushed the "traditional" proletariat vs bourgeois to the back burner, and replaced the innocent, oppressed, moral proletariat(poor people) with "innocent, oppressed, moral, non-white (neo-proletariat)" versus the "evil, oppressive, amoral white people (neo-bourgeoisie)".
To the 2 new "classes" of shoehorned, stereotyped, categories, they also add "other" proletariat members, such as gay, trans, etc. Then they add their intersectionalism to the mix to make it even more convoluted and ridiculous.
Your "value" as a human being is based NOT in your personality or character, but in how much melanin your skin contains, combined with whichever intersectionalism points you can check off. So, a gay black woman is "higher ranked" than a straight black woman, who in turn is higher ranked than a black man, who in turn is higher ranked than a white man. Figuring out the social ranking of a black man to a white woman is debateable, because they each can claim 1 intersectionality brownie point!
Identity group is ALL that matters, and as Biden and most leftist elites have told us, you are just part of an identity group, and you are EXPECTED to "adhere" to the "group dynamics", and NEVER become an independent, thoughtful individual who doesnt blindly follow along! As Biden said, If you are black and you do that, "then you ain't black"!
