• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Person of the Year: Ahmadinejad (1 Viewer)

jujuman13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
579
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Normally anything that Pat Buchanon says fills me with trepidation, but with this article he hits the nail fairly and squarely on the head.
And the sooner this US administration realises the reality of it, the better off will we all be.
Link
WorldNetDaily: Person of the Year: Ahmadinejad
Comments please.
Both President Bush and Ahmadinejad believe we are in the end of days, seemingly each is intent on provoking the other to act.
 
Normally anything that Pat Buchanon says fills me with trepidation, but with this article he hits the nail fairly and squarely on the head.
And the sooner this US administration realises the reality of it, the better off will we all be.
Link
WorldNetDaily: Person of the Year: Ahmadinejad
Comments please.
Both President Bush and Ahmadinejad believe we are in the end of days, seemingly each is intent on provoking the other to act.

I agree with Buchanan completely. Time ******d out. Ahmadinejad ran circles around the leader of the most powerful nation on earth.
 
Please note that those arch fascist neo-cons TOT and NAVY PRIDE have not sought to defend their excuse for a President's position.
 
I remember reading an article how Time magazine refused to put Fidel Castro on their covers like 4 times because they were afraid of backlash. Really sad. Good magazine with some good journalists going to waste because of their unwillingness to show the American public the complete truth.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom