• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Peres: Assad Sr. missed chance on Golan (1 Viewer)

The face of Jacob

"You Don't Suck" award
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
811
Reaction score
57
Location
Israel
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Vice premier says if Bashar Assad's father, former Syrian president Hafez Assad, came to Camp David, ‘I can promise you the Golan Heights would have been in Syrian hands for years now’

Hagit Klaiman Published: 09.27.06, 23:13

LONDON - If Hafez Assad, predecessor and father of Syrian President Bashar Assad, had come to Camp David with Egyptian President Anwar Sadaat, “the Golan Heights would have already been in his hands,” Vice Premier Shimon Peres purported Wednesday night at a conference of Jewish organizations in London.

“The Syrians are refusers of peace,” Peres said. According to Peres, the current Syrian president is hosting in his home a known terrorist – Hamas politburo chief Khaled Mashaal. He added that Mashaal was preventing diplomatic advances between Israel and the Palestinians and was blocking the release of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit – which even the Hamas government had agreed to.

Peres said that Sadat had called Assad, Sr., to join him in Camp David, and it is too bad he did not acquiesce to the invitation, because “I can promise you he would have gotten all of the Golan Heights.”


Missed opportunities

“A number of other prime ministers in Israel were willing to give back a good deal of the Golan Heights. That includes Yitzhak Rabin, Binyamin Netanyahu – who sent an envoy with the message that he was willing to give up most of the Golan, and even I, after Rabin’s murder when I was appointed prime minister, sent a message through the United State, that I would respect what Rabin promised,” Peres said.

“But since I was right before elections (March 1996 – ed.), I clarified that I needed an answer right away. The answer I got was that Assad was willing to meet with me, but he couldn’t name a date,” he explained.

Peres further noted, “What Syria is asking for now is that we return the Golan Heights and solve the Palestinian problem – and only then will they agree to talk with us. This is unacceptable. You don’t make demands before sitting at the negotiating table, but rather during the negotiations.”


'One government - one army'

As for the recent conflict with Hizbullah, Peres said, “There are a lot of Arab nations that wanted Hizbullah to lose the war, but they don’t have the power or ability to say these things out loud.”

“Israel expressed its readiness for peace with four countries: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and the Palestinians. We succeeded in two countries – Egypt and Jordan – and the reason is that in those countries there is one army and one government. In Lebanon there is more than one army and the Palestinians have no government, but just organizations that don’t agree with each other.”

Peres expressed his frustration over the peace process with the Palestinians, especially in light of the fact that Israel is still subject to Qassam rocket attacks and terrorism despite its withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. He expressed hope that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert could meet soon to advance processes.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3309028,00.html
 
Yeah. It proves genetics only go so far.

There would also be major OPEC complications rippling through the economic, and, by extension, political world.
 
The face of Jacob said:
Peres further noted, “What Syria is asking for now is that we return the Golan Heights and solve the Palestinian problem – and only then will they agree to talk with us. This is unacceptable. You don’t make demands before sitting at the negotiating table, but rather during the negotiations.”
It is not in the greater political interests of Syria for the Golan Heights issue to be negotiated and settled. The Golan is far more valuable to the Syrian government as a perpetual domestic/international grievance device.
 
Tashah said:
It is not in the greater political interests of Syria for the Golan Heights issue to be negotiated and settled. The Golan is far more valuable to the Syrian government as a perpetual domestic/international grievance device.
Probably it is so. To not have Israelian troops in virtually visual range of Dimashq and to win the Golan Heights back would be an important political success for the Syrian government. It would be the kind of success they need after what happened in Lebanon after the Hariri crisis. On the other hand a peace contract with Israel which settles the Golan Heights issues would make things more difficult for them with alliances and their position in the Arabian community.
 
This is from the initial article.
“A number of other prime ministers in Israel were willing to give back a good deal of the Golan Heights. That includes Yitzhak Rabin, Binyamin Netanyahu – who sent an envoy with the message that he was willing to give up most of the Golan, and even I, after Rabin’s murder when I was appointed prime minister, sent a message through the United State, that I would respect what Rabin promised,” Peres said.
To talk about giving back a good deal of the Golan Heights is not acceptable. The Golan Heights are Syrian territories.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom