• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Pentagon to release 9/11 video

Just saw it. It's the same exact video that has been out on the net for a couple of years now. Of course, the talking heads of mass media and their "expert analysts" are acting as though they have never seen this before. They probably really haven't seen it before. That's about how up their asses most of the TV news people and analysts have their heads. This sh it ain't new worth a damn.
 
The_Real_ElRoi said:
Just saw it. It's the same exact video that has been out on the net for a couple of years now. Of course, the talking heads of mass media and their "expert analysts" are acting as though they have never seen this before. They probably really haven't seen it before. That's about how up their asses most of the TV news people and analysts have their heads. This sh it ain't new worth a damn.
Click to expand...


I keep trying to watch it but the link won't go through for me. So it's not of a plane crashing right into it or what? I figured it would be something worthwhile.
 
The_Real_ElRoi said:
I believe the correct term is "quash." Anyway, they haven't realeased it yet, so who knows what it will show?
Click to expand...

"Squashed" is a common word used in America to denote the quelling of or the elimination of. Often used in the place of "quashed."

Main Entry: 1squash
Pronunciation: 'skwäsh, 'skwosh
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle French esquasser, from (assumed) Vulgar Latin exquassare, from Latin ex- + quassare to shake -- more at QUASH
transitive senses
1 : to press or beat into a pulp or a flat mass : CRUSH
2 : PUT DOWN, SUPPRESS <squash a revolt>
intransitive senses
1 : to flatten out under pressure or impact
2 : to proceed with a splashing or squelching sound
3 : SQUEEZE, PRESS
 
Yeah, if you are slightly illiterate.
I believe "quash" is a much more befitting term in regards to the subject of her sentence.

quash

v 1: put down by force or intimidation; "The government quashes any attempt of an uprising"; "China keeps down her dissidents very efficiently"; "The rich landowners subjugated the peasants working the land" [syn: repress, keep down, subdue, subjugate, reduce]
 
Calm2Chaos said:
Lets get a jump on the conspiracy theroist with the tin foil hats and the blow up doll girl friends....... "IT'S A FAKE, IT'S A FAKE, IT'S A FAKE !!!!!!! On the unbiased site I read, www.thegovermentplanneditall.com. T...ave the nerve to call themselves journalists.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Slightly illiterate?

That's about how up their asses most of the TV news people and analysts have their heads. This sh it ain't new worth a damn.
Click to expand...

I hear ya.....:roll:
 
Captain America said:
Slightly illiterate?



I hear ya.....:roll:
Click to expand...

Those sentences look grammatically sound to me. However, please feel free to critique them for me. I am always open to learning. OK, the "ain't" thing is somewhat in question, but...
 
Last edited:
The_Real_ElRoi said:
The real "conspiracy" is that the idiot news people are all acting like this has never before been seen until now. That exact video has been out on the net for at least three years. Yet, they all act like it is some new Revelation or something. And they have the nerve to call themselves journalists.
Click to expand...

Either way it's going to give the tin foil hat crew a few more feet out of a dead horse
 
The_Real_ElRoi said:
Those sentences look grammatically sound to me. However, please feel free to critique them for me. I am always open to learning.
Click to expand...

No worries mate. I'm not here to be a spelling cop or the forum grammer teacher. I just like calling others out for doing that.

But, if you insist, I suppose we could start here:

This sh it ain't new worth a damn.
Click to expand...

Let's dissect that.:rofl

Is English your first language? Just kidding bro....

You have yourself a very nice day!
 
OK I watched the video at msnbc and all it does it show the lawn then suddenly the building explodes. Nothing new really. I thought it would be a clear shot of a plane going right into the pentagon. Not that I believe the conspiracy theory but it would help to debunk them by showing some concrete evidence.
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12818225/

So.....where's the plane? If I was never sceptical before, I sure am now.:shock:

I didn't see a plane. Did anyone else???

What's is this suppose to authenticate?

I don't get it.

It's a far cry from "squashing" anything "once and for all."

Don't get me wrong, I am not one of the conspiracy people on this and I would tend to go with the official report on this but since seeing the video, I do have to wonder. It appears to me to support the conspiracy nuts more than the party-liners.
 
whatever hit was less than 100 feet on the ground. Why does it go from the nose cone being visible to absolutley nothing?
It almost seems as a frame was skipped.

The video is crap,
watch it in double size at BBC

does not look like a plane to me, in the least.
But I'm a crazy moonbat
 
Reminds me of the time Colin Powell showed an aerial photo of a couple of semi-trucks and said, "These are mobile chemical labs" and expected the world to take him at his word.

I could have taken the same photograph from the rooftop of the local truck stop.

I suppose we will never actually know.

Here's when Missouri Mule retorts "Where is that <forgot name> that died in the crash then?"

What the hell does any of this prove?

Why the big secret?
 
Captain America said:
Reminds me of the time Colin Powell showed an aerial photo of a couple of semi-trucks and said, "These are mobile chemical labs" and expected the world to take him at his word.

I could have taken the same photograph from the rooftop of the local truck stop.

I suppose we will never actually know.

Here's when Missouri Mule retorts "Where is that <forgot name> that died in the crash then?"

What the hell does any of this prove?

Why the big secret?
Click to expand...
watch it on CNN. seems better than BBc's.
At 7 seconds, you see a brief nose cone, literally 30 feet on the ground. Then you see a massive explosion, almost like vaporiziation.

It looks so much NOT like a plane hitting it.
 
I just went back and watched it several times. I even freeze framed it. I did see something coming in from the right just above ground level. It appears to be 10 or 15 feet above ground. It is cylindrical in shape but it is not easy to make out. One thing for sure, it sure don't LOOK like a big Boeing. Looks more like the Tomahawk missles we used to launch in the Navy. But, it's just too fuzzy to make out.
 
::Major_Baker:: said:
whatever hit was less than 100 feet on the ground. Why does it go from the nose cone being visible to absolutley nothing?
It almost seems as a frame was skipped.
Click to expand...
The plane was going 530 mph and the camera took one frame every 1/2 second. At that speed, it's a wonder it got anything.

And no, this video has NOT been out before. The previous video did not show an airplane at all, which is what most of the tin foil hat crowd crowed about.
 
::Major_Baker:: said:
watch it on CNN. seems better than BBc's.
At 7 seconds, you see a brief nose cone, literally 30 feet on the ground. Then you see a massive explosion, almost like vaporiziation.

It looks so much NOT like a plane hitting it.
Click to expand...

Just watched CNN's version. No difference. No jet.

Just a quick glimpse of an object, MUCH smaller than any jet I have ever seen, appears to be coming in at the building from ground level. It doesn't even come close to resembling a nosecone either.

It appears to be level horizontally with the ground and not at an angle as if it were a jet coming from the sky.

NOW I'm curious about all this.
 
Gill said:
And no, this video has NOT been out before. The previous video did not show an airplane at all, which is what most of the tin foil hat crowd crowed about.
Click to expand...

And this one does? Go back and watch it again Gill.
 
Captain America said:
Just watched CNN's version. No difference. No jet.

Just a quick glimpse of an object, MUCH smaller than any jet I have ever seen, appears to be coming in at the building from ground level. It doesn't even come close to resembling a nosecone either.

It appears to be level horizontally with the ground and not at an angle as if it were a jet coming from the sky.

NOW I'm curious about all this.
Click to expand...
It didn't come in at an angle... it came in almost at ground level. In fact it hit a fence and a generator in a construction area some distance from the Pentagon.
 
Gill said:
The plane was going 530 mph and the camera took one frame every 1/2 second. At that speed, it's a wonder it got anything.

And no, this video has NOT been out before. The previous video did not show an airplane at all, which is what most of the tin foil hat crowd crowed about.
Click to expand...

My 3 year old digital camera shoots video at 30 frames per second. Are you telling me that the Pentagon video cameras are that bad? Zero chance.

This "video" is only more evidence to prove that an AA 757-200 didn't impact the Pentagon. The government is making themselves look foolish in the eyes of Americans.
 
Calm2Chaos said:
Lets get a jump on the conspiracy theroist with the tin foil hats and the blow up doll girl friends....... "IT'S A FAKE, IT'S A FAKE, IT'S A FAKE !!!!!!!
Click to expand...

I just saw it and that's the Lunar Lander crashing into the Pentagon!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom