• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pentagon plans a type of 'flying submarine" (1 Viewer)

I'm sorry, but why do we need this?
Rather expensive way to do that.
Holy Batman!!!!!

Gotta keep ahead of the terrorists. They've destroyed both ships and planes, and this is clearly the most efficient possible way of dealing with the threat they pose.
While having both air and water capability is quite useful in attacking ships, the method discussed is overcomplicated for the task. Simply using a cruise missile that carries a torpedo as payload can accomplish the same mission far more practically. Using two optimized vehicles for air and water is much easier than trying to make one that can do both.
Any one remember "Voyage to the bottom of the sea." flying sub. Not sure why build it, but it would be interesting.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom