• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pelosi claims Congress is a 'superior branch' of government

AmIsraelHai

Well-known member
Joined
May 5, 2019
Messages
1,224
Reaction score
76
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday declared that Congress is a “superior branch” of government, as the clash between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration over closely held documents intensifies.

During an interview with Robert Costa for Washington Post Live, Pelosi, D-Calif., was asked whether Congress is functioning as a coequal branch of government.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2020 Democratic presidential candidates ignore Nancy Pelosi's call for Democrats to own the center-left​
 
That just makes Pelosi a complete idiot... in other shocking news, gravity still works today.
 

Ah yes, another dishonest spin from you while ignoring context. Nancy was simply stating that congress affects the day to day lives of people more than any branch of government and for the most part she is correct. Legislation affects more people than any other branch.

Keep spinning, all you are showing us is you just post dishonest comments void of any context.
 
Yes, and the American people are in contempt of Congress. What is their approval rating?
 

I post news
 
Yes, and the American people are in contempt of Congress. What is their approval rating?

As a whole yes, but people still keep electing their same people over and over again whether it is Dem or Republican. Voters tend to think congress sucks, except for THEIR reps. That still doesn't change or refute anything I've said.
 
I post news

No, you post an article and then spin it to how you want it and ignore context. Very dishonest on your part, but typical of your postings.
 
As a whole yes, but people still keep electing their same people over and over again whether it is Dem or Republican. Voters tend to think congress sucks, except for THEIR reps. That still doesn't change or refute anything I've said.


I wasn’t trying to change what you said, merely pointing out that ms Pelosi is not highly rated by anyone other than herself.
 
I wasn’t trying to change what you said, merely pointing out that ms Pelosi is not highly rated by anyone other than herself.

No, that's incorrect. She's obviously highly rated by not only the district that keeps electing her, but to the Dems in the house that keep electing her speaker. You may not like it, but let's at least accept facts and not spin as AmIsraelHai does.
 



She has lost control of her caucus, the progressives are running the show now.
 

Words matter, and we have 3 "separate but equal" branches of government for real reasons.

For anyone from any branch of government suggesting, or even inferring, they are somehow more superior than the other two branches of government for any reason, even implied, is dishonest and irresponsible.

It is both deceptively argumentative and a showing of political grandstanding to suggest any one branch impacts the "day to day" lives of more people than some other branch of government, and that is amplified by the increasing footprint the government has in our daily lives that is the direct fault of all three branches of government enjoying their ideological aristocracy.

Pelosi should not have gone there, and neither should you have... you are allowing your own political ideology support a falsehood.

And BTW, unless we are talking about a veto proof majority in the Legislative Branch, no Legislation becomes so with out the Executive Branch and depending on what legislative action we are talking about it very well could get crushed by the Judicial Branch anyway. All three very much impacting the people.
 
She has lost control of her caucus, the progressives are running the show now.

No, the various caucus is voicing their opinions. Or do you think that "Speaker of the house" title entitles her to a dictatorship of the Dems?

Funny, I haven't seen anyone complain about McConnell losing control of his Republicans when they rebuked him on various issues. Being a majority or minority leader doesn't mean king or queen.
 
No, you post an article and then spin it to how you want it and ignore context. Very dishonest on your part, but typical of your postings.

Yep. Sounds like a sock found its way out of the drawer.
 

Again, you are ignoring context. She was just speaking her opinion on the fact that congress is superior because of the effect it has on the day to day lives of folks. Not like you are a fan of hers anyway, so what does your opinion matter? Oh yeah, it doesn't.

I'll have to find also where you have been against Trump's comments of saying HE is the one to fix everything like he is a king. Nope, haven't seen a peep from you there. Wonder why?
 

Yep. The challenge for the Democratic leadership is being able to unify the varying messages in the party to one they can rally around before 2020. Whether they do it or not is a serious question given the increasing division and polarizing nature of politics. We've already witnessed this in the GOP with the rise of the Freedom Caucus, so we'll see if the progressive side of the Democratic Party does the same.
 

Being I am not much of a fan of either Trump or Pelosi I will be critical of both.

And ironically you try to point out I did not criticize Trump so that must be important, but my criticism and opinion of Pelosi does not matter anyway.

Which is it?
 

So you do think the majority or minority leader entitles them to a dictatorship. BTW the Dems are unified on many issues, hence why Trump had to cowardly work around congress because he wasn't getting his way. I'd say the Dems are quite unified on the wall, Healthcare and getting rid of Trump.
 
Being I am not much of a fan of either Trump or Pelosi I will be critical of both.

And ironically you try to point out I did not criticize Trump so that must be important, but my criticism and opinion of Pelosi does not matter anyway.

Which is it?

I didn't say it was important, just pointing out the typical anti-Dem hypocrisy that you folks display. You will excuse Trump on many things but then expect Dems to do something different. I'd say Trump's rhetoric is far worse than anything Peolosi has said. And yes, her comment is being take out of context as I already explained.
 

Way to go with the assumptions Praxas, my political leanings are liberal.

And ironically "out of context" is something you'll grant Pelosi and probably not to ole Trump.

Yet I'd call them both out, and if you go through my history of posts here at DP related to Trump and Pelosi... I generally do.

So again... which it is?
 

Nope, and I'm not sure where I implied anything like that in my post. By "unify" I mean that the differing segments of the party can come together on a candidate which also forwards parts of their agendas as well. A fragmented DNC will likely fail considering the GOP will be unified behind their candidate and dedicate their resources to that end.
 

Fox has once again given you a 'bullet point' to use as a political weapon. This has been entirely taken out of context and context is important. There's one way to put it into context and that's to watch the actual video of her CSPAN interview, or at least read the statement to get context. Taking a few words such as 'I think we are the superior branch of government' is out of context and inflammatory, and that's exactly what Fox News intended it to be.

But take a closer look at the video, at minute 00:16:15 and listen to the statement. Context is everything. For those who don't want to watch the video, here's the transcript from that portion of the interview. [Washington Post] Discussion With House Speaker Pelosi | C-SPAN.org


Question: "Is Congress at this point in time functioning as a co-equal branch of government?"

"I think we are a superior branch, quite frankly. We have the power to make the law and the president enforces the law. So, we have a big role, the closest to the people, and we have a big role to play. And the president, ....getting back to those 'acting' (referencing those in the cabinet that are in temporary 'acting' positions), so only people have left the administration in disgrace or dismay, so they have acting people. Some people have direct financial personal aggrandizement on decisions they make in their departments. That's why the door to subject themselves to the scrutiny of being confirmed tickets really a very, very sad situation. But that's about a matter for the election to determine, which is only about 18 months away so we are over halfway there. It will be interesting, but it shouldn't have to be this way. I've worked with, I've been in Congress a long time and understand we have a difference of opinion in terms of policy, and you come to Congress confident in your point of view but humble enough to listen to other views because you represent your district of the people and other people represent theirs. And so what our founders had in mind is we could have this debate. What is the role of government on the spectrum? How much federal, how much local and how must state. And that's exciting. But when you have a White House that is anti-governance, anti-science, it's very hard to stipulate a set of facts that they will be a proper government role in. We don't want anymore government than we need, but there's a proper role for governance. President George Washington cautioned against political parties for war with their own government, does that sound familiar to you? So, that they acting, I think everything. They have an acting chief of staff and that doesn't even require Congressional approval. I mean, it's sad.

I think we should be very prayerful about this. Our Founders --I keep going back to them because imagine the courage they had to declare independence, to wage a war against the greatest naval power that existed at the time too, to declare independence, to fight that war, to win that war and to establish a country predicated on the point of people coming together and thank God they made the Constitution amendable so it really could lift up the hope and promise of it all, the courage of it all." (end)

Nancy Pelosi's response continued and you can hear it but essentially what she was saying is that the cabinet and posts that are Congressionally approved, no longer exist and are in fact being manned by people that haven't been confirmed, lack experience and are only 'acting' in their current roles. The previous conversation was in regard to the enormous turnover of cabinet and staff in the White House, so, in this respect, yes, the Congress is superior because all are democratically elected government officials and none have been hand-picked or placed in their positions without proper vetting or election.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…