Grokmaster
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- 2,735
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Another post for the hall of fame..........loves Trump and going to call another’s appearance into question.......
Since Queen Botox has already been OUTED LYING about"SECURITY CONCERNS" by DHS and the Secret Service, she's trying to "evolve" her LIE. Meanwhile the POTUS just CANCELLED her TAXPAYER-FUNDED JAUNT for her own personal PR. (Probably saved her from being HECKLED by our troops, if she actually saw any who weren't HAND PICKED by her handlers.)
When ONE LIE FAILS, JUST PIVOT TO ANOTHER ONE.
Pelosi backtracks on the reasoning for her letter asking Trump to delay State of the Union
•House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested moving the date of the president's annual State of the Union address until the partial government shutdown is over, citing security concerns.
•The Department of Homeland Security said they are prepared to secure the Capitol regardless of the shutdown.
•Pelosi then changed her reasoning to focus on how employees would be working without pay, which was not listed in the original letter she sent to President Trump.
WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backtracked on her reasoning for postponing the State of the Union address on Thursday, suggesting the issue is about payment for federal workers securing the Capitol rather than the security issues she previously cited.
Pelosi informed President Donald Trump in a letter on Wednesday suggesting the State of the Union address — slated for January 29 — be moved "given the security concerns" of having the Department of Homeland Security suffering from the record-long partial government shutdown.
But on Thursday, after Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announced that the US Secret Service and DHS "are fully prepared to support and secure the State of the Union," Pelosi changed her tune to focus on whether those employees will be paid.
https://www.newstimes.com/technolog...-on-the-reasoning-for-her-letter-13541872.php
Glad you think there is an argument in all that gibberish you just posted. Myself, I just found gibberish.
•House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested moving the date of the president's annual State of the Union address until the partial government shutdown is over, citing security concerns.
•The Department of Homeland Security said they are prepared to secure the Capitol regardless of the shutdown.
•Pelosi then changed her reasoning to focus on how employees would be working without pay, which was not listed in the original letter she sent to President Trump.
Uh-huh. Glad you think your silliass deflection attempt fools anyone.
She is concerned about security? Well then open the government then!
What? I don't understand the issue here. She "changed her story?" How do you figure that? Is that seriously what you get from reading the above?
Here is what I get:
Pelosi suggested postponing the SOTU address citing security concerns.
Kirstjen Nielsen basically said don't worry about it. They'll be fully staffed, security just won't be getting paid.
Pelosi basically said they shouldn't expect employees to work without pay.
And this is "changing her story?" This a loss for Pelosi and a win for Trump how, exactly?
Do you ever read the articles you link to, or do you simply latch on to headlines and copy and paste a preconceived argument?
Wrong office buddy. She had House bills passed that would open the government and sent them on to the Senate where Mitchie-poo has got them all in a constipated jam. You need to head over to the other side of The Hill and tell Mitch to stop stonewalling.
Since Queen Botox has already been OUTED LYING about"SECURITY CONCERNS" by DHS and the Secret Service, she's trying to "evolve" her LIE. Meanwhile the POTUS just CANCELLED her TAXPAYER-FUNDED JAUNT for her own personal PR. (Probably saved her from being HECKLED by our troops, if she actually saw any who weren't HAND PICKED by her handlers.)
When ONE LIE FAILS, JUST PIVOT TO ANOTHER ONE.
Pelosi backtracks on the reasoning for her letter asking Trump to delay State of the Union
•House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested moving the date of the president's annual State of the Union address until the partial government shutdown is over, citing security concerns.
•The Department of Homeland Security said they are prepared to secure the Capitol regardless of the shutdown.
•Pelosi then changed her reasoning to focus on how employees would be working without pay, which was not listed in the original letter she sent to President Trump.
WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backtracked on her reasoning for postponing the State of the Union address on Thursday, suggesting the issue is about payment for federal workers securing the Capitol rather than the security issues she previously cited.
Pelosi informed President Donald Trump in a letter on Wednesday suggesting the State of the Union address — slated for January 29 — be moved "given the security concerns" of having the Department of Homeland Security suffering from the record-long partial government shutdown.
But on Thursday, after Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announced that the US Secret Service and DHS "are fully prepared to support and secure the State of the Union," Pelosi changed her tune to focus on whether those employees will be paid.
https://www.newstimes.com/technolog...-on-the-reasoning-for-her-letter-13541872.php
Trump owns all of this mess..He PROUDLY owns it. So many hurt by this shutdown directly and indirectly and his is owned by one man and one man only. Get all back to work and quit being bullheaded POTUS! Do us all a favor
Pelosi assures the electorate of transparency
Nancy Pelosi: 'Transparency will be the order of the day': Nancy Pelosi elected House speaker – video
Well, have to hand it Pelosi, she was pretty transparent, her statement about security concerns.
One should also note, that she doesn't appear to be particularly bothered about coming up with a deal to re-open the government, jetting hither and yon on tax payer funded junkets, nor the security of the electorate who are subjected to the negative issues that some illegal immigrants pose, cost, violent crimes, murders, rapes, child molestation, illegal drug deluge etc. etc.
A Democrat true to the core?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?