Peer Reviewed anti agw science papers

[bowerbird]

So you will not dispute the article? I take that as it is true

There are no "facts" in there to dispute - the very fact that you are unable even to precis the article shows that it is an opinion piece and as such carries NO weight.

 

[bowerbird]

GW has lost so much credibility Obama wants to change then name to Global Climate disruption

The only people that climate science has lost credibility with are those unable to understand even the basics of science - and unwilling to even try to make an effort

The rest of the scientific community understand what is involved and understand the attempts to discredit are just that - attempts

 

[ptif219]

There are no "facts" in there to dispute - the very fact that you are unable even to precis the article shows that it is an opinion piece and as such carries NO weight.

There are accuysations that I say are true. You have no defense so you opt out

 

[ptif219]

The only people that climate science has lost credibility with are those unable to understand even the basics of science - and unwilling to even try to make an effort

The rest of the scientific community understand what is involved and understand the attempts to discredit are just that - attempts

They have been caught in lies and data manipulation. They have no credibility then there is climate gate.

 

[Deuce]

They have been caught in lies and data manipulation. They have no credibility then there is climate gate.

So how come you ignore all the lies and manipulation from the skeptics side? How come, to you, they have credibility while scientists don't?

 

[ptif219]

So how come you ignore all the lies and manipulation from the skeptics side? How come, to you, they have credibility while scientists don't?

They are saying as it always has been we have natural climate change. There is nothing to prove. It is the GW crowd that is failing to prove it is caused by man with credibility

 

[Deuce]

They are saying as it always has been we have natural climate change. There is nothing to prove. It is the GW crowd that is failing to prove it is caused by man with credibility

So you're going to listen to people who lie because you think they don't have to prove what they say. Ok. :2wave:

 

[ptif219]

So you're going to listen to people who lie because you think they don't have to prove what they say. Ok. :2wave:

You are the one believing lies from the IPCC.

UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article - Telegraph

The United Nations' expert panel on climate change based claims about ice disappearing from the world's mountain tops on a student's dissertation and an article in a mountaineering magazine.

 

[Renae]

So how come you ignore all the lies and manipulation from the skeptics side? How come, to you, they have credibility while scientists don't?

Why do you position your question as if there are no scientist on the anti-agw side?