• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Path to 9/11 (1 Viewer)

dsanthony

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Location
Las Vegas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I just finished watching both episodes on the path on TIVO. Some comments:

Considering the 8 year time frame the movie encompassed, I thought it was very well constructed artistically and dramatically. Clinton may be upset because it focused so heavily on his administration... but he was president for 7 of the 8 years between the first and final attack on the WTC. Suck it up.

There were really only 2 "heroes" in the movie, FBI agent John O'Neill and "the Lion of Afghanistan", leader of the Northern Armies. (Won't try to spell his name). His death was in many ways more poignant (dramatically speaking) than the 9/11 attacks.

Patricia Heaton's small role was blown out of proportion during the media hype, to get the TV watching audience. Of course, the NPR crowd boycotted the movie anyway.

Neither Bush nor Clinton come off as heroes, but as I said the majority of the movie focues on Clinton's failings.

Anyone agree or disagree?
 
I didnt see it, but considering how much the Clinton appologists are up in arms, it must be fairly accurate.
 
dsanthony said:
I just finished watching both episodes on the path on TIVO. Some comments:

Considering the 8 year time frame the movie encompassed, I thought it was very well constructed artistically and dramatically. Clinton may be upset because it focused so heavily on his administration... but he was president for 7 of the 8 years between the first and final attack on the WTC. Suck it up.

There were really only 2 "heroes" in the movie, FBI agent John and "the Lion of Afghanistan", leader of the Northern Armies. (Won't try to spell his name). His death was in many ways more poignant (dramatically speaking) than the 9/11 attacks.

Patricia Heaton's small role was blown out of proportion during the media hype, to get the TV watching audience. Of course, the NPR crowd boycotted the movie anyway.

Neither Bush nor Clinton come off as heroes, but as I said the majority of the movie focues on Clinton's failings.

Anyone agree or disagree?


If you wish to see a non hollywood version of Jack O'Neill go here.........

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/

you can watch it online..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom