• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pascha, not Easter

TrumpTrain

Banned
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Messages
419
Reaction score
146
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
In another thread, somebody said the Easter is "another pagan festival stolen by the Christians". This is pure ignorance, and it is not true.

The Catholic Church calls it "Pascha", the Latin word derived from Passover. The Eastern Orthodox call it its Greek equivalent which, by sheer coincidence, is also spelled "Pascha". It is a celebration of the day Christ rose from the dead, and occurs at the same time as the Jewish passover, which we all know is when Christ was put to death and then rose again on the first day of the week.

That is the celebration, and the highest holy day on the Christian calendar.

The word "Easter" has been imposed on this holiday as a matter of the English language, not by the Church. The English language has given us a lot of rotten substitutions for religious words that were around before there even was an English language. The English language has its Genesis among the norther Barbarians of Europe, not the southern nations of the Empire. Have you ever noticed how Spanish and Italian and Portuguese all sound very similar? That because they all come from Latin, the language of the Empire. Other languages come from the Barbarians and the East.

In Spanish, Easter is "Pascua de Resurrección"
In Italian, Easter is "Pasqua"
In Portuguese Easter is "Páscoa".

Sadly, in English, we are stuck with Easter.

But this has absolutely nothing to do with the Church. The Church did not invent the English language. Pascha is what it is, the high holy day celebrating the day Christ rose from the dead. What it is NOT is "another pagan festival stolen by the Christians".
 
Pascha, not Easter!
By Father Dr Dumitru Macaila
Pascha, not Easter!

"The Venerable Bede (673?-735) gives us information related to the Christian Feast of feasts “Pascha” that is, how the greatest of all the Christians feasts came to be named Easter in the English language. He claims that the term comes from the word Eastre, a pagan Germanic goddess of spring, named Ostarun in old high German language.

As to Eastre, it was not only the name of the pagan Germanic goddess of spring, it was also the name of her festival. It is quite strange, in fact, unexplainable to me, how her name came to be given to the greatest of all Christian feasts, the Festival of festivals, the very foundation of the Christian Church. It is twice as mystifying if one remembers that “Easter” is the Christian Passover, that the core belief related to it is that through Christ’s resurrection, we passed from death to life, from bondage to sin to eternal life. The Hebrew term Pesah or Pesach means Passover, and on this feast the people celebrated their deliverance from slavery. Our Christian Passover is in direct continuity with the Jewish feasts involving the lamb that was to be without blemish, as a reminder that their firstborn had been saved from death
........"
 

https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/ancient-pagan-origins-easter-001571

Now, go find your Easter eggs...:2razz:
 

What a sadly ignorant and childish response.

Is there anyone here who can give me an intelligent response?
 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/03/easter-pagan-symbolism
 
From The Church of God website...


The Origins of Easter by Ross Abasolo - Enduring Church of God
 
Why would you demand what you clearly don't merit?

Another childish response. My first two posts in this thread were informative and spot on. How do you figure they don't merit a thoughtful response? Or are you just intellectually unable to give one.
 

from the website

"The Orthodox Church in America"
https://oca.org/questions/liturgicalyear/is-easter-a-pagan-feast

YOU WRITE: Today, I had a brief conversation with a work college about Easter. It stemmed from the question I asked him, “How was your Easter”—assuming he celebrated on the Gregorian date. He responded that he doesn’t celebrate “Easter” because it is based on pagan rituals. He proceded to show me literature on where he based his claims.

RESPONSE: He probably belongs to a so-called “Christian” sect—and there are a number of sects that use the term “Christian” but, in fact, have little in common with historic Christianity—that completely ignores the fact that historically, the Church since ancient times has celebrated the Resurrection of Christ—known to this day as “Pascha” among Orthodox Christians. Such sects are thoroughly ignorant of Church history. They confuse the contemporary use of the non-Christian term “Easter,” the secular “Easter symbols”—bunnies, chicks, and so on, none of which are found in Christian tradition, in the liturgical rites and hymns, etc.—and the like with the Tradition of the Church, which employs no such terminology or symbols. Meanwhile, the historic Tradition of the Church—and, frankly, the history of the Church itself—is completely ignored or denied, as if it never happened.

It is claimed—and it is not widely known that there is no solid consensus on this—that the word “Easter” is derived from the name of a pagan fertility goddess, “Estre.” Yet the Church, since ancient times, has referred to the celebration of the Resurrection as “Pascha,” the Greek/Hebrew for “Passover,” and not “Easter,” thereby emphasizing that the Resurrection is the fulfillment of the Old Testament Passover. Pascha is the New Testament Passover; Jesus Christ is the new Paschal Lamb Who sheds His blood, as did the OT paschal lamb, for the salvation of God’s People, that they might “pass over” from death to life, just as the OT faithful “passed over” from Egypt to the Promised Land. Hence, anyone even remotely aware of Christian history and doctrine is aware of the fact that the ancient celebration of Christ’s Resurrection is the completion and fulfillment of the OT Passover, and not a “Christianization” of pagan fertility rites and observances.

Unfortunately, in many cultures—including our own—the image of a bunny, rather than that of the victorious Christ, predominates, bearing no relationship whatsoever to the essence of Pascha; such secular symbols, however, surely do not define the Church’s Paschal celebration, nor do they indicate that they are “Church approved,” so to speak. Further, their presence is hardly a serious basis for accusing the Church of celebrating a “Christianized” version of some fertility rite or cult, as your friend would undoubtedly opine.

I might add that in some cases, we Orthodox Christians have done a poor job in proclaiming the essence of Pascha—the victory of the risen Savior.

How often do we find stories in the secular press or on TV which imply that the focus of Pascha for Orthodox Christians lies in colorful decorated eggs or in eating “traditional soup” made of lamb organs or in any number of garlic-laden sausages, with little or no mention of the Resurrection of Our Lord? [Let a member of the Jehovah Witness sect read such things, and is there any wonder that non-Orthodox individuals might wonder just what it is that we’re celebrating!!] It is crucial for Orthodox Christians to consider whether we in fact present to the world a clear picture concerning the celebration of Pascha, or whether we simply confirm for the misinformed and the detractor that we are merely continuing some pagan festival that has nothing to do with the risen Christ. In other words, we sometimes speak more of our beloved lamb and sausage and cheese recipes than of the “Lamb of God Who takes away the sins of the world” and Who brings us “from death to life, from earth to heaven.”
 
It is worth noting that English and German are virtually the only major languages in the Church whose word for the Festival of the Resurrection of our Lord does not derive in from the Hebrew pesach (Passover).
 
The Church of God are heretics. Is time for me to put your ignorant posts in Ignore. I prefer to hear from knowledgeable people, not people who continuously post lies. Welcome to the Ignore List.

Yah!:applaud :2dancing:
 
It is worth noting that English and German are virtually the only major languages in the Church whose word for the Festival of the Resurrection of our Lord does not derive in from the Hebrew pesach (Passover).

Passover does not fall on Sunday every year...:roll:
 
Another childish response. My first two posts in this thread were informative and spot on. How do you figure they don't merit a thoughtful response? Or are you just intellectually unable to give one.

Why are you responding to my post in such a childish manner?

You haven't merited any intellectual response. You've simply parroted ahistorical propaganda.

Meh.
 
Isnt Pasha a nickname for Pavel? :2razz:
 
The Christians usurped a pagan festival and called it Pascha. I already knew that.
 
Jesus never mentioned anything about remembering his resurrection...the one and only day he did command his followers to observe is this, in commemoration of his death, which gives us life...

Keep doing this in remembrance of me.” Luke 22:19
 
Last edited:
.......Is there anyone here who can give me an intelligent response?
Why would you demand what you clearly don't merit?
Another childish response. My first two posts in this thread were informative and spot on. How do you figure they don't merit a thoughtful response? Or are you just intellectually unable to give one.
Why are you responding to my post in such a childish manner?........

Because you posted a childish ignorant post. If you post an intelligent post I will give you an intelligent post.

Just a recap: I posted a very good OP, I asked for an intelligent response, and you childishly said that I do not merit on.

Don't start sniveling now after you threw the first punch.

Now, do you ever plan on addressing the first post or do you just want to causing strife
 
Last edited:

There's the loving Christian spirit going full blast.
 
If a Christian observes the Lord's Evening meal, which falls on the same day as the Day of Passover...Nisan 14...that is one thing, but to observe Easter Sunday is not what Jesus commanded, so that is in direct disobedience to what Christians are told to do by Jesus himself...
 
Last edited:

You posted utter irrelevancies and tripe, trying to lend some importance to the trivial fact that in German and in English, the word for "Easter" is different from the word for it in Romance languages.

It merits no intelligent response since your OP itself wasn't intelligent.

Duh.
 



"...in Latin and Greek, the Christian celebration was, and still is, called Pascha (Greek: Πάσχα), a word derived from Aramaic פסחא (Paskha), cognate to Hebrew פֶּסַח (Pesach). The word originally denoted the Jewish festival known in English as Passover, commemorating the Jewish Exodus from slavery in Egypt..."

So the Christians stole Easter from the Hebrews ?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter
 
He can call it what he likes but it will still remain a usurped pagan festival, just like Christmas.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…