- Joined
- Jun 30, 2015
- Messages
- 13,914
- Reaction score
- 4,086
- Location
- Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
In a scathing unanimous en banc ruling with prejudice the court cut short the attempt started on Wednesday to have millions of PA voters disenfranchised. Excerpts of the ruling are pure gold, e.g.:
The plaintiff also had let the period elapse for challenging the constitutionality of the law. IOW, yet another clown-show-on-crack by these mokes.“They have failed to allege that even a single mail-in ballot was fraudulently cast or counted,” Justice David Wecht wrote in a concurring opinion.
Of course, they are. That's been the plan all along. If this SC even agrees to hear any of these appeals it will reveal itselfTrump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”