• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

PA Supreme Court Throws Out Ditbag's Attempt to Nullify Election

digitusmedius

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
13,914
Reaction score
4,086
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
In a scathing unanimous en banc ruling with prejudice the court cut short the attempt started on Wednesday to have millions of PA voters disenfranchised. Excerpts of the ruling are pure gold, e.g.:
“They have failed to allege that even a single mail-in ballot was fraudulently cast or counted,” Justice David Wecht wrote in a concurring opinion.
The plaintiff also had let the period elapse for challenging the constitutionality of the law. IOW, yet another clown-show-on-crack by these mokes.
Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit.”
Of course, they are. That's been the plan all along. If this SC even agrees to hear any of these appeals it will reveal itself
 
Chief Justice Roberts may allow the Trump administration’s case to be heard, if not for any other reason than to validate the lower courts rulings.

Yeah, I know that’s not at all the job of SCOTUS, but we’re living in strange times and maybe if SCOTUS steps in and affirms previous rulings, more Americans (particularly Trump supporting Americans) will accept the truth/fact that Biden won the election fair and square, same as Trump did in 2016.
 
So he's 1-40 now?
Thereabouts. And the 1 "win" was later overturned:
The Trump campaign initially had a single win, when a Pennsylvania judge ruled on November 12 that first-time voters were supposed to confirm their IDs with county boards of election by November 9, rather than November 12. The decision opened the door to disqualify the ballots of people who didn't verify their IDs in time. But the state Supreme Court later overturned that decision.
So, effectively, 0 wins. So appropriate for this less-than-zero "man."
 
Back
Top Bottom