• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Outside Cleveland, thousands of Democrats are becoming Republicans

It's a good thing I'm not affected by hyperbole and spin. You'd have me cowering in the corner.

LOL!!

What hyperbole and spin is that? PLease list those things that are hyperbole and spin. These things I said about trump can be looked up in videos. or even his own books.. You are just gullible and should stay away from people selling ocean front property in Arizona.
 
Last edited:
Try telling that to the 16 Republican candidates, some with multimillion dollar purses, who got their asses whipped.

Trump won because of 4 things.

1.Democrats who rat ****ed the republican primary.Otherwise known as party raiding.Democrats voted for Trump in open primary states or switch party affiliation in closed primary states to vote for Trump in the primary so Clinton can curb stomp him in the general election.

2.Trump-tards who are the poster children for why there should be voting tests.These **** for brains clueless retards knowingly voted for someone who donated a hundred thousand plus dollars to Clinton,liked the Clintons so much he invited them to his wedding, supported liberal policies they claimed to despise and has donated to some of the most despicable liberal demorats and RINO republicans (the very people they claim to be pissed off at)

3.The media who gave Trump a **** load of free air time because they wanted a candidate Clinton could curb stomp in the general election. Sure there are some gullible conservative talk show hosts who supported Trump and kissed his ass sucked his balls to get him to call into their show.

4. Many of those 16 other candidates were establishment RINOs(some of whom Trump donated money to).But even those RINO establishment candidates were way more conservative than Trump and never donated money to liberal democrats.
 
What hyperbole and spin is that? PLease list those things that are hyperbole and spin. These things I said about trump can be looked up in videos. or even his own books.. You are just gullible and should stay away from people selling ocean front property in Arizona.

'Should hell freeze over, Bernie sanders renounces socialism and becomes a die hard capitalist and unicorns come out of Obama's ass,Because that that is the only way Trump will win the general you will have no one to blame but yourselves when Trump stabs you and other Trump supporters in the back.

This spin and hyperbole. :doh :roll:
 
This spin and hyperbole. :doh :roll:

1.Most polls shown Clinton curb stomping Trump in the general election.Trump also has a lot of faults that the liberal media will exploit in order to help make sure Clinton wins the general.

2, Trump changes his mind frequently,So the idea he won't stab you in the back is idiotic pipe dream that only a moron would believe.
 
1.Most polls shown Clinton curb stomping Trump in the general election.Trump also has a lot of faults that the liberal media will exploit in order to help make sure Clinton wins the general.

Here is the latest:

Screenshot (52).jpg

Hardly what I call a "curb stomping". LOL!!

Trump has lots of "trumped" up faults the liberals keep touting that are opposed by Hillary's indisputable, factual scandals and lies. We'll see who suffers most from the other side's exploitation.

2, Trump changes his mind frequently,So the idea he won't stab you in the back is idiotic pipe dream that only a moron would believe.

Trump, as will Hillary, will be bound by a Republican Congress...maybe a split Congress if the Democrats get lucky...so neither will have much power to stab anybody in the back. Even so, given her primary season actions as well as her history, I'd say Hillary is the more likely candidate to stab anybody in the back. Heck, she did it to her own State Department subordinates and got them killed.
 
Here is the latest:

View attachment 67204899

Hardly what I call a "curb stomping". LOL!!

Trump has lots of "trumped" up faults the liberals keep touting that are opposed by Hillary's indisputable, factual scandals and lies. We'll see who suffers most from the other side's exploitation.



Trump, as will Hillary, will be bound by a Republican Congress...maybe a split Congress if the Democrats get lucky...so neither will have much power to stab anybody in the back. Even so, given her primary season actions as well as her history, I'd say Hillary is the more likely candidate to stab anybody in the back. Heck, she did it to her own State Department subordinates and got them killed.


RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

Funny but the real clear politics graph doesn't look like that.What did you do zoom in at one of the rare times when Clinton and Trump were close?
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
graph.jpg


The vast majority of the Real Clear Politics polls show Clinton curb stomping and beating Trump.Just scroll down past the graph on the RCP.
 
Funny but the real clear politics graph doesn't look like that.What did you do zoom in at one of the rare times when Clinton and Trump were close?


The vast majority of the Real Clear Politics polls show Clinton curb stomping and beating Trump.Just scroll down past the graph on the RCP.

Different parameters.

Mine is a 4-way race between Trump, Clinton, Johnson and Stein. Your is a 2-way race between Trump and Clinton.

Since the election will be between all four candidates, mine is more accurate.

In any event, the graph you presented doesn't convey a "curb-stomping" either. It shows them tied.

I don't know...maybe your definition of a curb-stomping is different than mine, eh?
 
Last edited:
Different parameters.

Mine is a 4-way race between Trump, Clinton, Johnson and Stein. Your is a 2-way race between Trump and Clinton.

Since the election will be between all four candidates, mine is more accurate.

In any event, the graph you presented doesn't convey a "curb-stomping" either. It shows them tied.

I don't know...maybe your definition of a curb-stomping is different than mine, eh?
The graph shows Clinton curb stomping Trump in most polls. The handful of times that they were even tied or Turmp beats Clinton doesn't negate the fact that in most polls Clinton is curb stomping Trump.

And does Stein even have ballot access in all fifty states? I heard Johnson does.Johnson having ballot access in all 50 states and Stein not having ballot access in all 50 states will make Trump getting curb stomped by Clinton even more painful for Trump.
 
The graph shows Clinton curb stomping Trump in most polls. The handful of times that they were even tied or Turmp beats Clinton doesn't negate the fact that in most polls Clinton is curb stomping Trump.

And does Stein even have ballot access in all fifty states? I heard Johnson does.Johnson having ballot access in all 50 states and Stein not having ballot access in all 50 states will make Trump getting curb stomped by Clinton even more painful for Trump.

sigh...

You keep using that term, "curb-stomping". I've looked it up and the urban dictionary describes something totally unrelated to anything you are talking about. I have no idea what you mean by the term.

Before you keep repeating yourself with these ridiculous contentions, perhaps you need to define the term. Until you do, any further conversation is meaningless.

Exactly what do you mean by "curb stomping"?
 
Different parameters.

Mine is a 4-way race between Trump, Clinton, Johnson and Stein. Your is a 2-way race between Trump and Clinton.

Since the election will be between all four candidates, mine is more accurate.

In any event, the graph you presented doesn't convey a "curb-stomping" either. It shows them tied.

I don't know...maybe your definition of a curb-stomping is different than mine, eh?

Let's face it. Johnson has only a snowball's chance in hell of winning the presidency and Jill Stein doesn't even have that. The best Johnson could do is take enough electoral votes away that no one gets to 270. Then who wins the election? Does the Republican House vote for Trump or Johnson?
 
sigh...

You keep using that term, "curb-stomping". I've looked it up and the urban dictionary describes something totally unrelated to anything you are talking about. I have no idea what you mean by the term.

Before you keep repeating yourself with these ridiculous contentions, perhaps you need to define the term. Until you do, any further conversation is meaningless.

Exactly what do you mean by "curb stomping"?

There is a regular stomping. Like what Mitt Romny got in 2012 in which he lost by around 4%. A curb stomping in where someone is forced to bite down on a curb while another person stomps on the head or neck of the person biting the curb.Which is way more brutal than a regular stomping. When November comes Trump will metaphorically be biting the curb and Clinton stomping on the back of Trump's head.He will be lucky if he only loses by 4%
 
There is a regular stomping. Like what Mitt Romny got in 2012 in which he lost by around 4%. A curb stomping in where someone is forced to bite down on a curb while another person stomps on the head or neck of the person biting the curb.Which is way more brutal than a regular stomping. When November comes Trump will metaphorically be biting the curb and Clinton stomping on the back of Trump's head.He will be lucky if he only loses by 4%

So...

Now you are backing away from your contention that the polls show Hillary "curb stomping" Trump and going with a prediction about what'll happen in the election.

Okay...
 
So...

Now you are backing away from your contention that the polls show Hillary "curb stomping" Trump and going with a prediction about what'll happen in the election.

Okay...


I am not backing away from my prediction that Clinton will curb stomp Stump in November. Trump is a ****ty candidate. True Clinton is a ****ty candidate too.But the media as a whole is on Clinton's side.
 
I am not backing away from my prediction that Clinton will curb stomp Stump in November.

You have already moved your own goal posts in this little conversation...I don't think it'll be too hard or unlikely that you'll back away from other things you say. But hey...we'll see, eh?
 
Back
Top Bottom