- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 2,926
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
And you just chose those two particular examples by coincidence, right?
You said you're not putting him in the same class and in the same sentence you put him in the same class. You said that the general perception was that Zimmerman was guilty as charged even though the general perception is just the opposite. You pwned yourself and now you're backpedaling.
Wrong. I know what I said, I know what I think, despite the fact that you would like to make it something else. Like many things in life, this has layers. The OJ and Casey Anthony verdict are given as examples of people who received not guilty verdicts that many people believe truly were guilty. This is to make the point that it DOES happen. Therefore, the fact that Z received a not guilty verdict does not necessarily mean that he is innocent. Get it?