- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 100,717
- Reaction score
- 53,433
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Nobody is objecting. You're providing a straw man argument instead of actually meeting the standard of evidence I asked for. You've proven me right. You withdrew your goalposts from illegal search and seizure to fabrication of evidence.Fabrication of evidence is illegal. And is generally introduced during the search and siezure, but not always. Planting evidence is definitely illegal.
See
California Penal Code § 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence
https://youtu.be/SczkvLalvC8 California Penal Code § 134 PC makes it a crime to prepare false evidence with the intent to use it fraudulently in a legal proceeding. Doing so is a felony offense that carries a penalty of up to 3 years in jail or state prison. This is considered to be an...www.shouselaw.com
Also excessive force or manipulation during the search can be criminally liable as well. Like beating, berating or intimidating someone to say something you want that isn't true.
See,
Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
Now I'm not saying democrat party political operatives did this. But if they did, it should be investigated and prosecuted accordingly.
I don't know why anyone would object.
You don't actually have an argument. You don't actually have any evidence. You want to spew this vague platitude of "criminals should be prosecuted" pretending that anyone actually objects to it, when you know for a fact that they don't. The reason you are doing all of this is that it's the only way to justify what you actually want: Democrats in prison. You don't care whether there's actually any evidence they broke the law, that's just a facade and everyone sees through it.
I love watching you guys pretend to believe what you say, but I'm not going to engage with it as though it's real.