Mike.Redd
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2013
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 24
- Location
- Atlanta, Ga
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
That is not that many troops...
The Pentagon has estimated it would take “over 75,000 troops” to secure Syria’s chemical weapons.
Even just 1 U.S. service member in Syria is too many. We need to learn to leave global actions to the UN. We should put more of our time and energy into working to help others that would not put our service members in harms way.
This is crossing the "Red Line"
Source: Rare.us | Why 75,000 U.S. troops could be needed in Syria
The Pentagon has estimated it would take “over 75,000 troops” to secure Syria’s chemical weapons.
Even just 1 U.S. service member in Syria is too many. We need to learn to leave global actions to the UN. We should put more of our time and energy into working to help others that would not put our service members in harms way.
This is crossing the "Red Line"
Source: Rare.us | Why 75,000 U.S. troops could be needed in Syria