• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

On the Eve of an American Civil War (1 Viewer)

Marbleheader

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
To all who can still hear. Occam’s Razor is not the blade of choice with which our President slashes and hacks at reason and sovereign right. Far more sinister is his love of the peasants machete over American steel. I would wager that on this night we have before us the most conspicuous anticipations to ever fall upon the American public. Will our leader try to appease us with a faux show of force on the border as a means from which to launch a campaign of amnesty? Or will the populace of the strongest nation on earth be fed a pill of diversion? Must we suffer the President’s Internationalist fetishes any longer? At what cost is the rule of law? Did it take the angry voices of hundreds of millions of folk just to alert him that his socialist merrymakings nullified our constitutional foundations? If the answer is yes, then how then is his trust bound by that sacred text from which he enjoys his roost? My statement is clear. We are a nation ruled by laws not by men. And to this game of The Barter of Reason, I justly cast my lot with liberty and will never look back upon it.

From detachment the executive branch speaks with a daily barrage of concessions on liberty, if advice were to find its way from this federalist bully pulpit, to what manner of madness should the common man subscribe a rational peace? How much more inaction can we muster? One day no longer a fixture of complaint, the good men may be counted in shades that appear only in motion and as the true postulant, rightful heir to the rule of law-this I believe, but what of precious time?. Humble and dutiful petitions have been received by our executives and representatives and swiftly turned over to consulting firms and political strategists who feed the collectivist charlatans their fill. And what a meal that is! Was it not our own protectorate which revealed the daily practice and routines of our patriot brothers, already in the field (is there not a federal agency for such things?); to a cartel the likes of which governmental masquerades have never seen? What nation sells the safety of its own people to its enemy? Surely not ours? And yet we stand idle, as the greatest betrayal blows heavy in the foul wind. If so presented that our virtue and the ideals of our kindred were protection of the constitution, would not one and all among clear thinking men join this political sentimentality? If voice of votes had in any form a distant chance of success, then casting the ruling class into the minority wilderness for due penance would be the prevailing wisdom. But have we not tried this already? The translation of our remonstration has been taken with a laughter, as the expectation is that loyalties need not be repaid. One should not make the mistake that our grievances would not deign to be read with weight, the election of condescension is a fetish privy to those of real ascended landings. The uniform manner in which our elected servants seem to dance has the rhythm of mockery, the taste of haughtiness and disregard for a constituency which placed it on high. One might wager that the eggshells upon which such a clumsy notion of “peace in our time” treads, have long been broken at the mere insinuation of such amnesties and flights of fancy.

On the eve of our executives indulgence, I would beseech “him” to refrain from such a plastic counsel as a means of education of his base. At this place in time a ruse for any cause will find it casts a clear light upon itself. And one and all may simply count it as an evil deed to the times of double-the good public does not swallow such sharpened falsities. If we are plunged into such a misdeed, then it matters not who calls to arms , just that good men will listen.
 
"My statement is clear". Not really, too me it seems like you didn't really say anything with a lot of substance in that tirade. Tough to cut through the rhetoric and bullshit, but I got the basic gist that you want people to violently rebel against a lawfully elected government because you believe he has an, "internationalist fetish" and "sells the safety of its own people to its enemy", but you don't cite sources for any of this information, it's basically a bunch of bullshit.
 
You are the genius type aren't you?
Proof of an internationalist fetish?!?!? Where have you been, with your head in the sand? Take your Baby Boomer Federalism to your drum circle and pound a beat with your new communist peasant charlatans, the stupidity and non action of closet socialists like yourself caused this catastrophe. The last thing the United States needs is another Bush apologist...If it were appropriatte I would endeavor to help you with where to put your cosmopolitan nonsense, but as for me I am a political realist who knows when things are broken. As far as analyzing what people say, I think you need to stick to the little tickers on the lower third of the TV set, this way you won't get in over your head...lol
 
Marbleheader said:
You are the genius type aren't you?
Do you have to resort to sarcasm when challenged?
Marbleheader said:
Take your Baby Boomer Federalism to your drum circle and pound a beat with your new communist peasant charlatans,
Im a ways out of the Baby Boomer era my friend, I'm only 18.
Marbleheader said:
the stupidity and non action of closet socialists like yourself caused this catastrophe.
By catastrophe, I assume you mean Iraq and believe it or not I do agree that it has been horribly mishandled and we should not have been there in the first place, but if we leave now the world will just have another fundamentalist regime trying to destroy Israel. And trust me, I'm far from a socialist.
Marbleheader said:
but as for me I am a political realist who knows when things are broken.
And a revolution is your way of fixing things?
Marbleheader said:
As far as analyzing what people say, I think you need to stick to the little tickers on the lower third of the TV set, this way you won't get in over your head...lol
Do you think if you insult people who disagree with you they'll just cry and go away so you won't have to listen to opposing viewpoints anymore?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom