They sure do. Stuff like "you conceded"......"I won"......blah, blah, blah.
Wait, you conceded and you don't even remember! :rofl
... I remind you of the guy saying that blah blah in a movie when you are sitting there yelling "I never conceded. Show me where I conceded" after I am done with you and I am walking away from that one particular debate from you?! :rofl
In post 1075 you say, "I agree the entire bible is scripture".
Taking the OT into account allows for all of the violence included in it, like:
“Blessed is he who smashes their little ones against the rocks” (Psalm 137:9)
This point went to show that past religious events and leaders actions were relevant with regards to what is happening today with Islam. That was my point, and Egofftib's as well.
Just like this point, your assertion that I use weak snippet debate tactics was addressed in post 1082, and you ignored that one too. Typical. THAT, is weak, my friend.
Jesus never said to kill someone because they were harming Christianity or harming Jesus. Jesus was on the cross and being killed and Jesus said "forgive them because they know not what they do".
Do you see a difference here?
When the Prophet was wounded in the Battle of Uhud, some suggested that he curse the “idolaters”, the Prophet Muhammad replied, “I am not sent for damnation. O Lord! Guide my nation, they don’t know. ”
You sure need one.
Maybe you need one.
Agreeing on a point with you is not "conceding". Are you that desparate?
That verse from Psalms is always used by morons. You're as ignorant as they are. Nothing new. Please get something new.
Bodhi, I'm sure there's better things you can do with your time.
Agreeing on a point with you is not "conceding". Are you that desparate?
That verse from Psalms is always used by morons. You're as ignorant as they are. Nothing new. Please get something new.
No difference
Oh brother... here we go again with the classic playground come backs. :doh
Attempt to use another's remark against them like the whole, "I'm rubber and you're glue" routine. Smells... You suck.
...and did I actually say, "I won"? Don't think so, and if I didn't, for you to quote me as saying that is just more evidence of you lying. I believe that I said that Egofftb won and you lost, in fact.
Also, what is moronic with saying, "you conceded" when you did. You said, "I agree" after you initially did not, and after I provided evidence, you changed your answer to, "I agree". That is a concession, my friend.
This just gets better and better... you are currently running yourself in circles. I don't have top do anything, you are so frazzled! :rofl
Now you are using my "moron" comment against me?
Dude, do you have anything of your own?
That ONE QUOTE is just a quick find one that I grabbed.
How does it NOT indicate that the Old Testament contains violence though?
Hmmm.... maybe you can explain how that quote is peacefull?
I already offered you another debate, one that you did not accept.
What do you want me to do now? I guess I will go surfing in a few...
Oh... and since you agreed to my point after initially NOT agreeing, that is called CONCEDING. Look man, it is just the definition of the word, nothing complicated. Just simple English. It is alright, I know you are having trouble with this whole thing...
concede /kənˈsid/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuhn-seed] Show IPA Pronunciation
verb, -ced⋅ed, -ced⋅ing.
–verb (used with object)
1. to acknowledge as true, just, or proper; admit: He finally conceded that she was right.
2. to acknowledge (an opponent's victory, score, etc.) before it is officially established: to concede an election before all the votes are counted.
3. to grant as a right or privilege; yield: to concede a longer vacation for all employees.
–verb (used without object) 4. to make concession; yield; admit: She was so persistent that I conceded at last.
concede definition | Dictionary.com
How many people did Jesus behead or kill and how many people did Mohammed behead or kill?
Who is the quote attributed to? Hang around folks. I don't think he'll follow up, but if he does this is going to be fun to watch.
I just provided evidence from multiple sources showing that Christianity comprises MUCH MORE than just what Jesus taught. Focus... please. :roll:
Unless you can tell me why that is relevant, I don't care.
It is in the Old Testament and that is all that I am displaying.
Violence in the Chrisitian Old Testament... boom. Done.
Oh, and you don't debate the snippet thing or the conceding thing either,
So I guess that since you are moving on and ignoring those, you are
Conceding to my being correct about those two points as well.
Christianity is the entire New Testament. Christian == follower of Christ. The Old Testament rituals and laws are dead.
Focus.
What do you mean by "they are dead", weren't they a part of christian testament once.
Christianity is the entire New Testament. Christian == follower of Christ. The Old Testament rituals and laws are dead.
Focus.
Christian Bible
The Christian Bible consists of the Hebrew scriptures, which have been called the Old Testament, and some later writings known as the New Testament.
Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Old Testament
The Old Testament is the collection of books written prior to the life of Jesus but accepted by Christians as scripture ... Several Christian denominations also incorporate additional books into their canons of the Old Testament.
Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bible
the sacred scriptures of Judaism and Christianity. The Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament
Bible -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia
Bible
the sacred scriptures of Judaism and Christianity. The Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament
Holy Cow! Are you serious? :rofl
You just agreed that:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls...l-still-seeking-peace-108.html#post1057898053
By saying that you agreed , "I agree the entire bible is scripture" - Walleye
Scripture /ˈskrɪptʃər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [skrip-cher] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. Often, Scriptures. Also called Holy Scripture, Holy Scriptures. the sacred writings of the Old or New Testaments or both together
scripture definition | Dictionary.com
Jeez... let's look at this one AGAIN: :roll:
Christianity is BOTH the New AND THE OLD TESTAMENT. Look, if you are simply gonna be obtuse about this, then that is fine. I can deal with it if you are joking, or lying for some kicks, and even if you are serious about it (ie Delusional).
Just realize that all intellectually honest people understand that Christianity is BOTH the New AND THE OLD TESTAMENT because it is so. Don't blame me, blame the dictionaries and the encyclopedias. They deserve your "moron" comments and your scorn. I am just the messenger...
No. Christians do not follow any of the rituals or dietary laws, etc, in the Old Testament. They are dead. Jesus on the cross said "it is finished". Gone, dead, over. Finished.
Christians live in a new Covenant (Testament). It's like if you have a will and testament and you tear it up and make a new one. The old one is no longer in effect.
Yes, it is violence but it is not condoned. Just because it is written about doesn't mean it is right. Example....Job thought for sure it was God punishing him, but by reading the book we find out it was the devil who killed his family and ruined him and it was God who blessed him afterwards. It is in the bible, but it was not God.
I don't expect you to see the difference, but hopefully some of this will sink in. Is there an adult there to help you? Is your mommy home?
Ok, it is relevant, or so you say without providing a translation regarding the quote that I provided. You say that it was not condoned and then you give a different example? How about explaining why the quote that I used is not relevant instead before you start acting like a an arrogant clown thinking that you made some good point. This is just the start of the debate, the one that you wouldn't initially accept, but now you are kinda dancing around in sissy fashion.
Are you saying that there are no passages containing violence in the OT that are not from God? I seem to remember quite a few from him, and/or some prophets.
And this is where you senile characteristics are shining through... I asked how and why it was relevant and take that simple question, asked so that there is zero confusion, as a sign of an inability to comprehend? Interesting assessment... :roll:
So, do you want to debate that there is/is not condoned violence in the Bible or not?
I can't help it if you're dense. The fact is the entire bible is scripture and I believe that. Another fact is that the Old Testament rituals and laws are not in effect. They are dead. Finished. That does not mean that the Old Testament is no longer scripture. It is still the Word of God. Christians live under the New Covenant (Testament).
I thought acting like an arrogant clown was okay? I saw you do it so I thought it was required.
Psalm 137 was written during the time of great despair and is spoken in revenge for the acts committed against the Jews. God is not condoning revenge. Just like God is not condoning what happened to Job, although Job thought God was doing it to him. It is iin the bible, but it is not what God promotes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?