O'Keefe Voter Fraud Investigation: Young Man Offered Holder's Ballot

Grant · Apr 20, 2012

nonpareil said:
How many times do I have to explain it? If it costs more than it saves, it's idiotic to use it. "Improvement" implies that it eliminates frauds at a larger number than it disenfranchises, and I have explained why this solution doesn't do that many times already.

No need to explain further because no one is being "disenfranchised". Nobody.

That's what's called a "Re Herring".

ARealConservative · Apr 20, 2012

nonpareil said:
No, they did a study to look at all the cases of in person voter fraud that ever come up. That is the closest to scientific of all the evidence available.

Did they acknowledge the inability to truly gauge the scope of the problem because of the lack of oversight in the entire process?

How many times do I have to explain it? If it costs more than it saves, it's idiotic to use it. "Improvement" implies that it eliminates frauds at a larger number than it disenfranchises, and I have explained why this solution doesn't do that many times already.

This is nonsense. What value do you place on lessening voter fraud? You haven’t explained jack ****, you have offered your opinion, and I reject your opinion.

O'Keefe Voter Fraud Investigation: Young Man Offered Holder's Ballot

Grant

ARealConservative

cookies crumble

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency