- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 16,875
- Reaction score
- 7,666
- Location
- St. Petersburg
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
you are on record wanting to impose the California level of idiocy on the rest of us
1) you are in favor of imposing an arbitrary limit on magazine capacity. any such limit is not based on any scientific studies or evidence but was (at 10) a number pulled out of the rectum of the Democrat party
2) you are on record as saying that the 10 round limit is suitable and ANY magazine that holds ten or more rounds is ONLY FOR WARFARE. that sort of idiocy is terminal and has doomed any of your gun claims to the dungheap of silliness
3) you are on record demanding that semi automatic magazine fed weapons should be banned. You have never been able to articulate a rational argument for that desire-rather you have said society needs to "Try it" because of "all the problems" those rifles cause. In reality, ALL rifles are used in less than 3% of all murders. So you are LYING.
this crap about banning guns that millions of Americans own merely to TRY TO SEE if it does any good is one of the most mentally deficient arguments I have ever seen
I believe he does want to ban certain guns to see if it works, because he knows it won't and that will lead to banning more guns to see if that works .... Repeat.