- Joined
- Nov 3, 2005
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 24
- Location
- Outer Darkness
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
If he was guilty of the murders, why was he acquitted?
True... I also believe Jury Racial Bias (nine blacks, two whites and one hispanic) was also a key factor in his having gotten away with murders... This recent case was an all white jury. Even more irony.The jury came to the right verdict - not guilty. Not because OJ was innocent, but because the prosecution failed to prove that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
True... I also believe Jury Racial Bias (nine blacks, two whites and one hispanic) was also a key factor in his having gotten away with murders... This recent case was an all white jury. Even more irony.
Plausible yes... Still I am one who believes in the inevitability of prevailing truth... In which case here I find a slight vindicated in rather, karma.That may be true, but I believe that even if it had been 12 white people on the jury on the murder case, he would have been acquitted. There just was too much reasonable doubt built into the case by the LAPD planting of evidence and the DA's ineptness.
Whats not to like?!?!? :2wave:Don't let TOJ change the subject. He was directing that question at me because he can't stand me.
Plausible yes... Still I am one who believes in the inevitability of prevailing truth... In which case here I find a slight vindicated in rather, karma.
He was acquitted of the murder because LAPD framed a guilty man.
It was evident early on in the case that the LAPD manipulated evidence in order to strengthen a case against Simpson that didn't really need to be strengthened.
The fact that the police planted blood at OJ's house that had preservative in it screwed the case up.
Also, the prosecution in the case botched the case as well. It was poorly tried by all of the prosecutor's involved.
The jury came to the right verdict - not guilty. Not because OJ was innocent, but because the prosecution failed to prove that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
I think this is complete bull****.
It is as large a slap in the face of justice as it was when he got off for the murders.
In a court of Law, 2 negatives do not make a positive.
Karma or not... Both court decisions are wrong.
According to an anonymous juror... The audio tape bagged him.
If everyone knows he was guilty of the murders why did the jury not also know? Was there compeling evidence they did not know about?
If everyone knows he was guilty of the murders why did the jury not also know? Was there compeling evidence they did not know about?
You are not legally allowed to act in your own behalf.
He organized this robbery.
He told the guys to bring guns.
Then he executed his plan.
How do you figure he's not guilty?
Who thinks they could get away with what he did?