• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Officials Weigh Booing Ban at High School Games

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Only in left wing Seattle, this is outrageous......


ABC News: Officials Weigh Booing Ban at High School Games

March 4, 2007 — From brawls on professional basketball courts to out-of-control parents at Little League games, unsportsmanlike behavior can be a problem.

Now, some high school sporting officials in Washington state are considering tough new rules — including a ban on booing.
 
Oh good grief. First their papers and tests can't be marked in red because it might hurt their self esteem, now this?

Sorry, but negative things happen in the real world. Sheltering kids from negative things (like booing) isn't going to help them when they leave school.
 
This kind of thing only serves to keep kids soft. I say, let kids learn that life isn't always fair and can be tough while they develop into adults, or else they will be wimps and crybabies forever.(I will now be checking myself into rehab for offending wimps and crybabies)
 
Bad idea, but what does it have to do with Seattle being left-wing???

Don't you know? Only feel good left wing liberals would want to not hurt the poor kids' feelings! :lol:
 
Don't you know? Only feel good left wing liberals would want to not hurt the poor kids' feelings! :lol:

I don't think the booing ban is designed to protect kids' feelings, but to protect the referees. When the booing escalates into violence, it isn't good for anybody. While I do think banning booing would be a violation of the free speech amendment, I wish parents would set a better example for their children.
 
I don't think the booing ban is designed to protect kids' feelings, but to protect the referees. When the booing escalates into violence, it isn't good for anybody. While I do think banning booing would be a violation of the free speech amendment, I wish parents would set a better example for their children.

I hear ya. I agree that violence isn't a good thing, and that more parents need to be setting good examples for their kids. But remember, it's not just the parents booing, it's the players' peers as well.

Stuff like this stems from the whole self esteem boosting movement. It seems like you can't turn around these days without finding some new thing that schools are doing in order to preserve students' self esteem. And while that in and of itself isn't necessarily a bad thing, there's a point where what they propose and/or implement is just ridiculous and over the top. Kids DO need to learn about disappointment, failure, and all that other stuff too. The real world isn't going to cushion their feelings or their self esteem, so there's got to be a limit to how much the schools do. Too much cushioning is just setting our kids up for failure and a HUGE hit to their self esteem once they join the adult ranks and things aren't rainbows and flowers anymore.
 
Kid's these days have too much self-confidence. banning Booing? Come on, let's ban cheering too? Afterall, cheering from one side makes the other side feel bad.:roll: Stupid.
 
Kids DO need to learn about disappointment, failure, and ...

And civility and good sportsmanship. The main purpose of school sports is supposed be about learning sportsmanship. So while I don't think booing should be banned, I think parents and school officials should monitor events and do their part to discourage it.
 
I am all for doing what we can to help kids with their self esteem. Doing what this article is suggesting, does not enhance self esteem. Enhancing it is often accomplished by understanding ways to feel good about yourself even when faced with adversity. Making one feel good about situations by eliminating adversity does nothing for self esteem. It creates a personality that is unable to deal with life's challenges (never having the experience in dealing with them) and can cause narcissism. There are far better ways to help our kids with self esteem then removing all obstacles, challenges, and adversity.
 
BTW, I have no idea how this issue has anything to do with 'left wing'. So far every 'left winger' that has posted on this thread has come out against the article's proposal.
 
I don't know how they'd even enforce it... what if the half the crowd starting booing?
 
I am all for doing what we can to help kids with their self esteem. Doing what this article is suggesting, does not enhance self esteem. Enhancing it is often accomplished by understanding ways to feel good about yourself even when faced with adversity. Making one feel good about situations by eliminating adversity does nothing for self esteem. It creates a personality that is unable to deal with life's challenges (never having the experience in dealing with them) and can cause narcissism. There are far better ways to help our kids with self esteem then removing all obstacles, challenges, and adversity.
Either A) Seattle has no other issues to discuss about; or B) the politicians can't risk discussing anything else and find this for their re-election campaigns. or C) HOA mentality within the PTA have gotten way way out of hand in over-reaching.
 
And civility and good sportsmanship. The main purpose of school sports is supposed be about learning sportsmanship.

It's actually supposed to be about learning the values of teamwork, hardwork, and willingness to sacrifice. Good sportsmanship is more of a side benefit.
 
BTW, I have no idea how this issue has anything to do with 'left wing'. So far every 'left winger' that has posted on this thread has come out against the article's proposal.
I have a theory, it's based on the assumption that booing is "politically incorrect" the theory of politically correct behavior and language is inarguably an ideal from the left side of the isle. That being said, since booing could "hurt someone's feelings" it is now offensive apparantly and thus not p.c., therefore, the logical leap being made is to assign it to the left. Just trying to be helpful.
BTW, it doesn't really matter to me which ideology led to the debate on booing at events, it's still a stupid idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom