Furiounova
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,237
- Reaction score
- 552
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
and until you posted the NEW link there was ZERO evidence of it and technically there still isnt unless thats the official police statement and not hear say AND we know for a fact his gun only discharged ONCE
what if it discharged twice? and we saw the second one?
so tell me the cool line about ignorant againLOL
No, the video proves that the gun went off once when the officer struck the kid in the back of the skull. Now this does place DOUBT on the officer's testimony, significant doubt. But if more than one bullet was fired, then it is possible that prior to the video the kid went for the gun and it discharged. If the cop said only 1 round was fired, then yes that absolutely would prove his defense and testimony absolutely false. Was that the claim? If so, then it is assured that these cops did significant wrong doing and should be behind bars.
There will be lawyers on both sides, and they will all be getting paid. Problem?
His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.
Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
You asked about what the video proved and in response I said:
"The cop's weapon discharged. In order to explain it the cop claim Dorm assaulted him and tried to take his gun. The video proves Dorm never made a move and was walking when the cop came up behind him and pistol whipped him, accidentally firing at the same time."
You responded by saying the video doesn't prove that. How. I have no freaking clue because it clearly shows the cop hit him when Dorm didn't even raise a single hand.
Yes. Lawyers that feed off the misery of others are somewhere between cockroaches and maggots.
I didn't come in at the beginning of the argument. If the gun discharged once and the claim by the cops was that the single discharge occurred when the kid went for it, that absolutely this video proves they are lying. And in that case, not only should the city pay big to these kids, those "cops" should get 30 years in federal pound me up the ass prison.
His gun discharged once. For the 18th freaking time he tried to claim his gun discharged because Dorm assaulted him and reached for his gun. The video clearly proves that did not happen. I think some of you spend so much time trying to pick things apart you can't see some of the most obvious facts.
Dorm was released from jail as soon as the prosecutors saw the tape and a couple of weeks later the cop was charged with second degree assault. It should be attempted murder.
no it doesnt to anybody honest, logical and rational, what happened before the video?
do you know for a fact nothing happened before the video?
LMAO again the video alone doesnt prove/disprove anything yet
it shows the gun go off but what if the official reports form the multiple cops say it went off twice? lol
what if the assault happened before the video?
this is how simply it is
I still stand by everything I have said
if you disagree prove anything I said factually wrong with the info you have posted already.
should be simple right since you posted "obvious facts" lol
Good luck with that.
I don't need luck with that. Lawyers who take advantage of people's miseries for profit are nothing but scum.
You must really hate therapists too.
The cop's gun discharged once.
Read that about twenty five more times but I know you won't because you refuse to admit you made a mistake when you claimed the video did not prove what I said.
That is why I started with the fact:
The cops gun discharged. Any logical rational person would see that as saying it discharged ONCE and especially.......
Never mind.....don't have the patience for your games.
I already did that.
You know and we all know you will never admit your mistake.
You have got to have a 3rd degree blackbelt in moron to see 'racism' in any of these comments.I'm really too disgusted by the racist agenda here so have fun with that.
It looks like you are just begging praying for a way to blame the victim in some way. It is disgusting.
Like I just posted........but entertain us.......what does the "video" suggest?
Falsifying records, false imprisonment and giving false testimony would be rather bad too, yes? If what is alleged is true.
We have no way of knowing any of that from a short clip of the officer running up to him and hitting him.
Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
Well if one shot and one shot only was fired, we know the cop is lying.
That is also a true statement. Obviously the cop didn't mean to discharge his weapon but he DID mean to clock the guy in the dome with his weapon and just happened to have his finger on the trigger. Regardless of what occurred before the video recorded them, he definitely lied about the guy reaching for his gun causing the discharge.
that confuses me?
you say that "if" the cops gun only discharged once then yes the cop is lying, which I totally agree
but then you say regardless of what occurred before the video the cop definitely lied?
uhm but IF the gun discharged twice, once of camera, couldnt that have been when he reached for it before he started running?
again not saying thats what happened by any means, just saying the video doesnt prove the guy "never" reached for the gun and it discharged until we know the number of times it did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?