• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Of Glaciers and Satellites - CDN Newsletter Readout

Robertinfremont

Photo of me taken in the Army 1963
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
30,122
Reaction score
3,395
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
We are still retreating from an ice age, nothing more.

Can you tell the difference in 1919 and 2019? Nobody can.

 
Some people found out it seems.

Fig13-375x271.jpeg
 
Norway Glaciers Show Surprisingly Small Retreat During 2020…”Nigardsbreen Glacier Actually Grew”
By P Gosselin on 18. October 2020

Share this...
Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter
As the globe has warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age, alarms concerning retreating glaciers have been sounded worldwide. The reason for the warming remains hotly disputed: alarmists blame it on manmade CO2 while skeptics say natural factors are just as much at play, if not more so.

Image: Norwegian glace, for illustration purpose. Source: NASA/John Sonntag, public domain.
Very little retreat in Norway this past summer
Yesterday Norwegian NRK here reported “several of the largest glaciers have almost not shrunk” during this past summer.
“This year, several places in the country have almost not shrunk,” according to the Norwegian NVE.
Since 1962 experts have been monitoring the Nigardsbreen glacier, an arm of Jostedalsbreen located in Vestland county. The summer of 2020 has seen the sixth slowest result in about half a century. “If we get more such summers to come, then the glacier front will grow forward again,” says Even Loe in Statkraft.

“The glacier is named after the farm Nigard, which was crushed by the glacier in 1748. At that time the front of the glacier stopped about 4.5 km further ahead than it is today,” reports the NRK.
Experts attribute this past summer’s stagnation to “a good winter with a lot of snow.”
“The Nigardsbreen glacier has actually grown bigger.”
Glaciologist Hallgeir Elvehøywhich said the glacier retreated 4 meters, “something that is very small compared to previous ones.”
“The trend is largely the same elsewhere in the country,” he says.
Although many glaciers have decreased relatively little this year, the Norwegian experts still remain pessimistic about their future, should warming continue as the models project. “But in all the gloom, there is also a small glimmer of light, should the rainfall continue.”
“There is nothing in the way that the climate system can give us several years with so much snow, and then it will have an effect.”
 
Let me get this straight. If there is just s little cancer in one part of your body, then it's nothing to worry about because all the rest of your body is doing okay, right? That is what you are saying about manmade global warming.
 
Norway Glaciers Show Surprisingly Small Retreat During 2020…”Nigardsbreen Glacier Actually Grew”
By P Gosselin on 18. October 2020

Share this...
Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twitter
As the globe has warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age, alarms concerning retreating glaciers have been sounded worldwide. The reason for the warming remains hotly disputed: alarmists blame it on manmade CO2 while skeptics say natural factors are just as much at play, if not more so.

Image: Norwegian glace, for illustration purpose. Source: NASA/John Sonntag, public domain.
Very little retreat in Norway this past summer
Yesterday Norwegian NRK here reported “several of the largest glaciers have almost not shrunk” during this past summer.
“This year, several places in the country have almost not shrunk,” according to the Norwegian NVE.
Since 1962 experts have been monitoring the Nigardsbreen glacier, an arm of Jostedalsbreen located in Vestland county. The summer of 2020 has seen the sixth slowest result in about half a century. “If we get more such summers to come, then the glacier front will grow forward again,” says Even Loe in Statkraft.

“The glacier is named after the farm Nigard, which was crushed by the glacier in 1748. At that time the front of the glacier stopped about 4.5 km further ahead than it is today,” reports the NRK.
Experts attribute this past summer’s stagnation to “a good winter with a lot of snow.”
“The Nigardsbreen glacier has actually grown bigger.”
Glaciologist Hallgeir Elvehøywhich said the glacier retreated 4 meters, “something that is very small compared to previous ones.”
“The trend is largely the same elsewhere in the country,” he says.
Although many glaciers have decreased relatively little this year, the Norwegian experts still remain pessimistic about their future, should warming continue as the models project. “But in all the gloom, there is also a small glimmer of light, should the rainfall continue.”
“There is nothing in the way that the climate system can give us several years with so much snow, and then it will have an effect.”

A biased article by a denier. Again: *YAWN*
 
Let me get this straight. If there is just s little cancer in one part of your body, then it's nothing to worry about because all the rest of your body is doing okay, right? That is what you are saying about manmade global warming.

The worst that can be said about Man is he had a very minor effect in some areas of Earth and as to the gas Carbon Dioxide, it is extremely beneficial to plant life.
Plant life consumes the gas and the benefits to man are many.
 
The worst that can be said about Man is he had a very minor effect in some areas of Earth and as to the gas Carbon Dioxide, it is extremely beneficial to plant life.
Plant life consumes the gas and the benefits to man are many.

That's far from the worst that can be said about it. And what is said about now terms of economic and environmental disaster Ike,
 
Jack produces top rated articles and sticks to science.

Actually, what Jack "produced" is a BLOG by a denier, not a climate scientist. There are hundreds and thousands of these guys out there with their denier blogs, basically passing around false information to one another. Or cherry-picking facts and adding opinIons that are incorrect. This is no big deal at all. Just another yawner.
 
Actually, what Jack "produced" is a BLOG by a denier, not a climate scientist. There are hundreds and thousands of these guys out there with their denier blogs, basically passing around false information to one another. Or cherry-picking facts and adding opinIons that are incorrect. This is no big deal at all. Just another yawner.
The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate.

You'll have to stop hiding eventually.
 
Let me get this straight. If there is just s little cancer in one part of your body, then it's nothing to worry about because all the rest of your body is doing okay, right? That is what you are saying about manmade global warming.

Where did all the stuff they found under melting ice come from like human remains if the area hadn't melted before? A trick by the AGW cult's Satan perhaps?
 
The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate.

You'll have to stop hiding eventually.

Guess you didn’t read the entire article: “Although many glaciers have decreased relatively little this year, the Norwegian experts still remain pessimistic about their future, should warming continue as the models project.”
 
Guess you didn’t read the entire article: “Although many glaciers have decreased relatively little this year, the Norwegian experts still remain pessimistic about their future, should warming continue as the models project.”
Yes, and . . . ? I'll take the observations and let the model projections keep spinning.
 
Of course you will.
Scientist’s Confession: Climate “Models Have “Serious Flaws”… Confident Others Will Speak Up On “Fraudulent Claims”
By P Gosselin on 14. September 2019

Now in English… An eye-opener book by Japanese MIT climate scientist now partly available in English at Kindle. MIT climate scientist Dr. Mototaka Nakamura’s writes global warming data are “untrustworthy”, “falsified”. Image: http://iprc.soest.hawaii.edu/ Not long ago we reported on a recently released book authored by Dr. Mototaka Nakamura, a scientist who received his doctorate from MIT […]
 
We are still retreating from an ice age, nothing more.

Can you tell the difference in 1919 and 2019? Nobody can.



Who to believe, climate scientists on a worldwide basis, of a couple of deniers in a chat forum?
That one is easy.
 
Who to believe, climate scientists on a worldwide basis, of a couple of deniers in a chat forum?
That one is easy.


Or you who takes total responsibility for global warming!!!
 
Problems are solved by eliminating their source. Is CO2 increase the problem? Are humans the cause? Do we really want to solve the problem?

Dress accordingly.
 
Problems are solved by eliminating their source. Is CO2 increase the problem? Are humans the cause? Do we really want to solve the problem?

Dress accordingly.

Do we really want to solve the problem? Sure, let’s give it a try. We caused the problem, surely we have some responsibility to try to resolve it. Plus the world is way overpopulated, so we need to look at solving that, too, through more education about and use of birth control.
 
Do we really want to solve the problem? Sure, let’s give it a try. We caused the problem, surely we have some responsibility to try to resolve it. Plus the world is way overpopulated, so we need to look at solving that, too, through more education about and use of birth control.
Would anything we might do about anthropogenic climate change result in solving or reducing the economic costs other issues such as overpopulation/poverty/unemployment/inflation/inequality/healthcare/etc?

If State and Federal governments were to put an end to ALL social "safety net" programs, and instead provide each citizen rich or poor a $100,000 tax free bank account on their 18th birthday, it would cost government about $300 billion each year. Once spent, invested, or disposed of, family, friends, or private charity would be the only source of aid the remainder of their life.
 
Would anything we might do about anthropogenic climate change result in solving or reducing the economic costs other issues such as overpopulation/poverty/unemployment/inflation/inequality/healthcare/etc?

If State and Federal governments were to put an end to ALL social "safety net" programs, and instead provide each citizen rich or poor a $100,000 tax free bank account on their 18th birthday, it would cost government about $300 billion each year. Once spent, invested, or disposed of, family, friends, or private charity would be the only source of aid the remainder of their life.

For whatever reason, you subscribe to an “all or nothing” mindset. Are you a Republican? Here I thought that Republicans were all into responsibility. I guess not. And you seem to have gone out on some sort of limb that has no direct bearing on the topic of AGW and how and why to stem it.
 
For whatever reason, you subscribe to an “all or nothing” mindset. Are you a Republican? Here I thought that Republicans were all into responsibility. I guess not. And you seem to have gone out on some sort of limb that has no direct bearing on the topic of AGW and how and why to stem it.
I'm open to hear your solution. What I posted would have direct bearing on the cause of AGW, the human element. I never claimed I want to stem AGW, only how the cause might be. As I said earlier, dress accordingly.
 
Back
Top Bottom