And just exactly why would heterosexual people like myself and President Obama want to do that? How would that benefit us exactly?
The LGBT community makes up maybe like 2% of the total population. In order to impose their agenda on America they would need at least 51% of heterosexual people all of a sudden decide that they're perfectly fine with sexual deviancy and mental disorders. How exactly does 2% of the population con so many Americans into being okay with that without making an incredibly sound argument?
It outs the gay agenda and it shows us the power of the LGBT lobby. Obama used to be outspoken against gay marriage. Now he is the LGBT's bitch.
The Gay Agenda is real, and this bathroom thing is just another step towards their ultimate goal: putting sexual deviancy and mental disorders on he same plane as hetero-normative behavior.
Federal education funds come from the federal government to insure that students are getting a well rounded education rather than being proselytized at by extremists who control wacky states. If states refuse to give a proper education to their children and ensure each child has a positive environment in which to learn then federal dollars should not be used for it. If North Carolina or Mississippi or Texas would like to brainwash their children they can pay for that garbage themselves.
What is the "Gay Agenda"?
Ramming things initially not wanted by a majority of the country through by using media and political pressure to sway not only public opinion but also politicians and businesses. Putting men in the women's restroom over the objection of women would be a good example of it.
"What good is it to tell women to avoid rape by watching their surroundings while the system allows sex offenders to watch them shower." --some twitter tweeter.
The same? What was the vote count in Congress for the bill Obama signed?It's no more unconstitutional than Reagan's decree requiring all 50 states to change the legal drinking age to 21.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act
Obama's decree just like Reagan's doesn't actually force the states to do something, it only makes it so that they lose federal funds if they don't do it.
Other than the transgenders being allowed in bathrooms I can't see any difference between the equality that gays want and the equality that blacks wanted back in the day... and got.
Most gay rights initiatives were justified. Stopping police raids on gay bars, overturning sodomy laws, allowing gays in the military and, finally, same sex marriage. All those old policies were wrong. And, for all I know, the trans issues being fought over may someday be proven to be justified too. Maybe someday we will learn that a brain's "gender" truly is sometimes mismatched with someone's biological birth sex.
But, agree with them or not, the above are indeed all part of the gay agenda.
Most gay rights initiatives were justified. Stopping police raids on gay bars, overturning sodomy laws, allowing gays in the military and, finally, same sex marriage. All those old policies were wrong. And, for all I know, the trans issues being fought over may someday be proven to be justified too. Maybe someday we will learn that a brain's "gender" truly is sometimes mismatched with someone's biological birth sex.
But, agree with them or not, the above are indeed all part of the gay agenda.
Making it a crime to address someone with unpreferred pronouns in the workplace is not justified.
Especially if you always knew them as a "he."
That's not even the whole thing though. You have to know the proper terms and if you get them wrong then you're open to being sued if you're a business and fired if you're an employee.
The same? What was the vote count in Congress for the bill Obama signed?
Okay, so you don't know the difference between a law passed by Congress and a Presidential decree. Thanks.Irrelevant. The department of education which is overseen by the executive branch already has discretion on how it hands out federal education funds.
Okay, so you don't know the difference between a law passed by Congress and a Presidential decree.
That's not even the whole thing though. You have to know the proper terms and if you get them wrong then you're open to being sued if you're a business and fired if you're an employee.
Every single solitary time throughout history where we've had controversy's like this that pit traditional people stuck in the past vs younger more open minded people, youth always wins. No matter what stupid bull**** laws North Carolina or Mississippi tries to pass within 10 years it will be overturned, the controversy will be over, and what younger more liberal minds originally thought will become the norm. All you're doing is delaying the inevitable and making yourselves look like Dinosaurs in the process.
Every single solitary time throughout history where we've had controversy's like this that pit traditional people stuck in the past vs younger more open minded people, youth always wins. No matter what stupid bull**** laws North Carolina or Mississippi tries to pass within 10 years it will be overturned, the controversy will be over, and what younger more liberal minds originally thought will become the norm. All you're doing is delaying the inevitable and making yourselves look like Dinosaurs in the process.
If you think liberals endorse original thought then you have really no understanding of history at all. You also don't appear to realize that in order to enable original thought you have to be open to the idea people have the right to disagree with you, which liberals have proven they don't believe in.
Btw, you're 33 now, so you're no longer part of that young group. Just sayin'.
Already sourced it if you were bothering to pay attention. Why should I waste my time doing research for you that you won't listen to anyway?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?