• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Rwanda?

Excerpted from “More airstrikes in eastern Libya; Gaddafi to face international probe” By Leila Fadel and Steve Hendrix, Washington Post Foreign Service, The Washington Post, Thursday, March 3, 2011; 11:22 AM
[SIZE="+2"]F[/SIZE]orces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi launched renewed airstrikes against two key rebel-held towns Thursday, a day after poorly armed citizens repelled a major government assault on the area. …

“We want logistical foreign intervention, air embargoes, bombardments of air bases, communication centers and supervision of the coasts. Otherwise, the battle will take too long, and it will never end, and more people will die, and there will be a big question mark over the future of Libya.” — Muftah Queidir, a lawyer close to Benghazi's rebel governing coalition¹

“A no-fly zone begins with an attack on Libya to destroy the air defenses. That’s the way you do a no-fly zone.” — US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates²

There are a whole lot of western leaders hoping the Libyan rebellion wraps up quickly so questions about them taking military action on behalf of the rebels are moot. But many signs now indicate that it has become a stalemate with a high chance of much bloodletting. President Clinton didn't act as stories of genocide emerged from Rwanda; later he apologized for his failure to act.³ Is Libya potentially Obama's Rwanda?
Top Bottom