- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 133,429
- Reaction score
- 43,224
- Location
- Miami
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I think it was a fine speech. Of course, he knew he had some quality work... wagering as he did in presenting it from the Oval Office.
Perhaps a bit measured (and excessive in the use of 3 examples preceded by repetitive verbs... what's the name of that tool?).
I particularly liked "sons of the Gulf". The blending of humans and habitat, in a sort of anthropomorphism is nice to hear.
I liked his vision and felt that when he refered to "God", he was refering to "collective influence" or whatever our own god may be. A bit much praying at the end and the God thing became cumbersome; overall, a decent inclusion of religion, spirituality or social mission with room for the individual observer to insert their philosophy.
I saw glimpses of things that helped get him into office, but the mechanics, repetition and slightly excessive god-stuff kept it from being a really great speech (for me).
I suppose we should attach links, etc; however, I doubt it is on youtube yet.
What do you think about the speech itself (style, methods, etc) and the positions outlined therein?
Perhaps a bit measured (and excessive in the use of 3 examples preceded by repetitive verbs... what's the name of that tool?).
I particularly liked "sons of the Gulf". The blending of humans and habitat, in a sort of anthropomorphism is nice to hear.
I liked his vision and felt that when he refered to "God", he was refering to "collective influence" or whatever our own god may be. A bit much praying at the end and the God thing became cumbersome; overall, a decent inclusion of religion, spirituality or social mission with room for the individual observer to insert their philosophy.
I saw glimpses of things that helped get him into office, but the mechanics, repetition and slightly excessive god-stuff kept it from being a really great speech (for me).
I suppose we should attach links, etc; however, I doubt it is on youtube yet.
What do you think about the speech itself (style, methods, etc) and the positions outlined therein?
Last edited: