- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Thing is, the communities don't. TX has the highest rate of uninsured people in the country.
Problem is people like you read the headlines and by the rhetoric, there are 6 million uninsured people in TX much less than those in California but the reality is of those 6 million more than half are eligible for Medicaid but didn't sign up. More are able but choose not to participate in plans available or even company plans. Guess that reality escapes you
No, I used actual results, those are the numbers the President INHERITED but like all economically challenged liberals you believe budgets are actual spending and you hold Republicans to a different standard. Only in the liberal world is the President(Republican) responsible for the entire yearly debt when in office from Oct-January. It is interesting how results never matter and arrogance takes over. Liberalism is a failure, total and complete. Your passion for it says a lot about you
One thing we know for sure about your "statistics" is that we must not accept them at face value (see your false presentation of debt accumulated by presidents). Where'd you get this latest laugher?
While we're waiting for you, here's an actually accounting of % uninsured by state (2013 data):
Health Insurance Coverage of the Total Population | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
CA at 15%, TX at 20%. Neither one has anything to brag about but TX and NV tie for the worst out of all 50 states.
Obama has cut the deficit in half while recovering us from the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
She's a bit, let's say, scrambled in her explanations of things. I sense that ineffable whiff of libertoonianism which dwells in the hinterlands of absurdity.
Post #328 will cure all your ills.
Even the right wing CATO institute believes Bush is responsible for much of the 2009 deficit, it is only the most radical rightwingers like you that defend Bush far beyond normal limits. Even still it takes real balls to ignore the massive drop in revenues from the economic collapse and just blindly claim that Obama somehow spent those extra trillions. Obama has cut the deficit in half while recovering us from the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
post 328 quotes me telling you I am NOT asking for a legal opinion but only your personal opinion as to what CONSENT has to do with the health care law.
All I want the person to do is offer an explanation as to how the idea of CONSENT has any relevance to the health care law.
And then telling me it was a legal question. You got it, turbo.
Legally?
what the heck does CONSENT have to do with a national program which applies to the citizenry which has been passed by the peoples government and upheld by the judiciary?
But you asked a legal question.
Now are you ready to explain what you claim CONSENT has to do with health care?
It appears that all the victories last week have boosted Obama's approval rating to 50% for the 1st time since 2013. I guess more of us are proud to be an American.
Obama's approval rating grows following memorable week - CNNPolitics.com
Even the right wing CATO institute believes Bush is responsible for much of the 2009 deficit, it is only the most radical rightwingers like you that defend Bush far beyond normal limits. Even still it takes real balls to ignore the massive drop in revenues from the economic collapse and just blindly claim that Obama somehow spent those extra trillions. Obama has cut the deficit in half while recovering us from the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
Are you asking a legal question?
nope - just asking you to explain your introduction of the idea of CONSENT in a discussion about the health care law.
Even the right wing CATO institute believes Bush is responsible for much of the 2009 deficit, it is only the most radical rightwingers like you that defend Bush far beyond normal limits.
Then why is it you post data and run from the posts that refute it?
Asking me about law?
All I want the person to do is offer an explanation as to how the idea of CONSENT has any relevance to the health care law.
No, I used actual results,
I responded to your question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?