Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The only thing Reaganomics did to the middle class was provide as a vehicle for upward mobility. Why would someone want to be middle class when they could have a President who implements policy that provides them the opportunity to become upper class?
Liberal logic.
His own VP declared it Voodoo economics, so stupid was it. Nothing trickled down, and the middle class has been weakened by his "Voodoo economics"
What?
Millions specifically lost their health insurance. It is irrelevant if those that lost theirs later got different plans and different doctors they did not want.
Right. I get it. Just because they got better plans and millions of the uninsured got plans too, all that matters is the talking point.
Just because most got better plans and millions of the uninsured got plans too, all that matters is the talking point.
Exactly, that is why the GDP doubled and 17 million jobs were created. Apparently you have a different definition of trickle down that the majority in this country. Guess we need a massive central govt. to provide equal outcome vs. opportunity. Yep, that is liberalism, insanity
Right. I get it. Just because most got better plans and millions of the uninsured got plans too, all that matters is the talking point.
Better to you or them?
Just better.
Today is the July 4, a Celebration of our Independence where we declared our independence from British rule. People died to give us the right of choice and that includes the right to make the wrong one. Liberals want everyone to believe as they do and thus tries to legislate personal responsibility issues. When are you going to learn that doesn't work?
Nope, that would be FDR.
Oh really? Explain the 2006 midterm then, liar.
BS.
Reaganomics’ Failure
But this debt crisis did not originate with George W. Bush. It can be traced back primarily to President Reagan, who arrived in the White House in 1981 with fanciful notions about restoring America’s economic vitality through massive tax cuts for the wealthy, a strategy called “supply-side” by its admirers and “trickle-down” by its critics.
Reagan’s tax cuts brought a rapid ballooning of the federal debt, which was $934 billion in January 1981 when Reagan took office. When he departed in January 1989, the debt had jumped to $2.7 trillion, a three-fold increase. And the consequences of Reagan’s reckless tax-cutting continued to build under his successor, George H.W. Bush, who left office in January 1993 with a national debt of $4.2 trillion, more than a four-fold increase since the arrival of Republican-dominated governance in 1981.
https://consortiumnews.com/2013/10/17/the-abject-failure-of-reaganomics/
They died for the right to go bankrupt if you get sick? I don't think so and your saying that is disrespectful.
You said that the only reason Republicans were in control of Congress is because of low voter turnout due to it being a midterm election.
Yes this is true as well.Well....weve had midterm elections that resulted in Democrats controlling Congress before as well....less than 10 years ago in fact.
So you are lying to people to fit your narrative. Whats new?
Then you don't understand payroll taxes, that funds their retirement account, SS, but big govt. liberals don't understand that.
Today is the July 4
Better to you or them?
In other worlds please explain the difference between a 2.6 trillion dollar debt(Debt Reagan left the Country with) on a 5.6 trillion dollar economy vs a 18.2 trillion dollar debt(Debt today) on a 17.5 trillion dollar economy?
What this shows is that Gruber was right and you prove it with every post
Does ACA cover Bush Derangement Syndrome??
Given Carter's failed attempt to rescue the Iranian hostages it took balls to try to pull it off. If he failed ...
Today is the July 4, a Celebration of our Independence where we declared our independence from British rule. People died to give us the right of choice and that includes the right to make the wrong one. Liberals want everyone to believe as they do and thus tries to legislate personal responsibility issues. When are you going to learn that doesn't work?
That would be you.:roll:
BS.
Reaganomics’ Failure
But this debt crisis did not originate with George W. Bush. It can be traced back primarily to President Reagan, who arrived in the White House in 1981 with fanciful notions about restoring America’s economic vitality through massive tax cuts for the wealthy, a strategy called “supply-side” by its admirers and “trickle-down” by its critics.
Reagan’s tax cuts brought a rapid ballooning of the federal debt, which was $934 billion in January 1981 when Reagan took office. When he departed in January 1989, the debt had jumped to $2.7 trillion, a three-fold increase. And the consequences of Reagan’s reckless tax-cutting continued to build under his successor, George H.W. Bush, who left office in January 1993 with a national debt of $4.2 trillion, more than a four-fold increase since the arrival of Republican-dominated governance in 1981.
https://consortiumnews.com/2013/10/17/the-abject-failure-of-reaganomics/
Exactly right!The difference, you ask? It's called the Great Bush Recession and his tax cuts to the rich that we'll be paying for decades if not remedied. I love how selective the conservative view of history is. You know how much of that $18T debt belongs to dems since 1976? About 1/3. The rest is the result of the Reagan/Bush combined deficits and the compounding effects of interest costs they've generated. Conservative economics and fiscal policy have strangled this country over the past 30 years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?