- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 36,989
- Reaction score
- 17,941
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
First the qualification is easy to determine and found any place you look up the ACA that isn't a right wing fearmongering crap fest. Tyr the Kaiser family Foundation link... I can't remember the exact cut off but you can play with the calculator and see what subsidy you get for the state and income you punch in.
Second- you keep using the worn out CON crap ofredistribution for a subsidy that saves 'wealth' taxpayers have by cutting the cost of providing health care- CONs refuse to admit we are paying heavily for the current system of the poor/uninsured using the ER room as their primary health care provider and the obvious benefit of preventative procedures in cost reduction.(well now ya dropped wealth as that REALLY was silly)
Keep banging your tired little drum...
. These 'bureaucrats' are often former ER doctors and critical care physicians who 'force' changes on the hospital, it's staff and administration or face insurance hikes to the extreme of being dropped.Third- the lies and right wing wild assed accusations of the IPAB are NO different than the 'efficiency experts' the insurance companies are using on hospitals and medical centers they insure
Quitter Palin tried to call the IPAB 'death panels' which was an outright lie. It is to make the process and procedures as efficient as possible. One big recommendation- making medical records a lot more assessable for duplicate diagnostic procedures didn't drive costs up.
... :dohBut Sir they are not death panels
I don't recall using the word "wealth" unless I was repeating what someone said or it was in relation to redistribution because that's what it undeniably is.
Oh no no no. You're quite wrong. Take a look at the details about the IPAB and what happens with their recommendations. Have you done that?
And yes, what IPAD decides could very easily affect lives.