- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
- Messages
- 11,430
- Reaction score
- 2,282
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
oh piss off:roll: I posted historical examples (having actually read the article) and you,ve just posted partisan filth.
So in other words, you have nothing factual to back up your lies, just the usually partisan hackery of calling someone a rapist that has not raped anyone, Got it. I thought you were against slander, after all the defending you did of Palin. So I guess you are quite ok with accusing someone of guilt when it hasn't been brought before trial.
You are right about one thing, you are not a court of law, so your OPINION and your Judgment means nothing to the real world.
Carry on. :2wave:
Que? ........
So, in other words, you have no comment to make about the historical ignorance of your Messiah and his teleprompter puppeteers. Your Messiah refused to define what "victory" was, yet you're perfectly happy that he has continued to put troops in the field to not secure victory.
Lots of dead Americans, something the left was eager to see under Bush, but now they're going to ignore them since their Messiah is saving them for a non-victory.
The majority on the left was not eager to see soldiers die, but don't let facts get in the way of your pathetic and childish partisan attacks.
""We are confident that if we are assisting the Afghan people and improving their security situation, stabilizing their government, providing help on economic development ... those things will continue to contract the ability of Al Qaeda to operate. And that is absolutely critical,""Our goal is to make sure they can't attack the United States".
That's how He defines our objective.
This was also part of GWB's stated objective, thought Bush's full objective was far broader.
Given that, I am not sure how or why it is The Obama supporters here feel the need to attack Bush.
His goal is the same as it has been, to ensure Afghanistan has a stable government and is providing assistance to that.
""We are confident that if we are assisting the Afghan people and improving their security situation, stabilizing their government, providing help on economic development ... those things will continue to contract the ability of Al Qaeda to operate. And that is absolutely critical,"
Sounds to me like The Obama is proceeding with the same goals and the methods to achieve them as GWB.
Sure you are.
I remember the celebrations you people had commemorating the 3000th dead soldier in Iraq, and then the 4000th.
But I bet you don't say a ****in' word about the soldiers "Don't Want No Victory" Obama gets killed.
Sounds to me like the Messiah is afraid of use a manly word like "victory", and he wants to have americans fight and die for no victory.
this is not a freaking game, if you wan't "victories" and "manly words" go back to your Halo mission, the Commander is calling you.
No, this is war.this is not a freaking game, if you wan't "victories" and "manly words" go back to your Halo mission, the Commander is calling you.
this is not a freaking game, if you wan't "victories" and "manly words" go back to your Halo mission, the Commander is calling you.
No, this is war.
And in war, you do everything you can do to win.
If you arent willing to do everything you can do to win, then you get out.
Anything else causes unnecessary loss of life and property.
Sure you are.
I remember the celebrations you people had commemorating the 3000th dead soldier in Iraq, and then the 4000th.
But I bet you don't say a ****in' word about the soldiers "Don't Want No Victory" Obama gets killed.
So can you please tell us, what "non-victory" is and what it entails? :doh
No, that would be "victory", and your messiah just stated he doesn't want to define victory.
The Obama defined this as when we are "sure they can't attack the United States."How exactly are we to determine victory? What is the criteria?
I believe The Obama covered this, when he plagarized GWB in saying that there would be no surrender on a battleship.Who or what will sign the surrender? Do you expect an entity to actually sign surrender documents?
No - as The Obama said, "we're not dealing with nation states at this point. We're concerned with Al Qaeda and the Taliban, Al Qaeda's allies".Do you at least acknowledge that we are not fighting a state, but an idea?
You need to ask The Obama.How long do people actually expect to be in Afghanistan? How long do people honestly think a mission could go on long after public support has ended?
When my nation puts men in the field where they can be shot at, you can bet your sorry liberal whiny ass that I want the term "victory" defined and plans in place to secure that victory with the least possible risk to my side.
I just love the way whiny ass liberals who've never served in the military want to avoid the word "victory" merely because it's making their messiah look foolish.
Your nation, led by irresponsible, privileged rich boys who never served in the military, put Americans at risk in Iraq with no plan for "victory" and no hope of resolution. So don't talk to me about "whiny liberals" or your manly Republican patriotism. You started a war in Afghanistan that you walked away from , then started another in Iraq which cannot be "won". Your side blew it...again....leaving the rest of us to clean up your mess. Next time you feel like acting manly, go watch a Rambo movie.
So can you please tell us, what "non-victory" is and what it entails? :doh
Psst... this in July of 2009, not January of 2006.Your nation, led by irresponsible, privileged rich boys who never served in the military, put Americans at risk in Iraq with no plan for "victory" and no hope of resolution.
... so then you disagree with The Obama and his continuance of GWB's means, methods and goals in Afghanistan?You started a war in Afghanistan that you walked away from...
Again...this in July of 2009, not January of 2006.then started another in Iraq which cannot be "won".
Cleaning it up... by doing exactly the same thing that GWB was doing.Your side blew it...again....leaving the rest of us to clean up your mess.
Your nation, led by irresponsible, privileged rich boys who never served in the military, put Americans at risk in Iraq with no plan for "victory" and no hope of resolution.
So don't talk to me about "whiny liberals"
or your manly Republican patriotism.
You started a war in Afghanistan that you walked away from,
then started another in Iraq which cannot be "won". Your side blew it...again....leaving the rest of us to clean up your mess. Next time you feel like acting manly, go watch a Rambo movie.
Afghanistan started a war with the United States on September 11, 2001.
You've chosen to forget.
I never will.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?