- Joined
- Aug 3, 2018
- Messages
- 34,752
- Reaction score
- 3,961
- Location
- north carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
and by the way, are you comparing corruption with sexual deviancy?
Sin is sin.
and by the way, are you comparing corruption with sexual deviancy?
I did not follow the Iranian deal.
So I am not informed enough to comment.
I just believe that one should not use words like "steal" from Americans when discussing a president's actions, especially at this time when some Americans are going around claiming that the current president is a "traitor" in league with Russia!
We older people remember that lawyer in the 1950s who asked this plaintive question of a Senator who -- without evidence -- was accusing people of being stooges of the Russians, too: "Have you no decency, sir?"
In my opinion, some Democrats (and their media supporters) do NOT have any decency.
Have a nice day!
Sin is sin.
Yes, by far most of the right today has no decency...look at who they support in the WH, a man without a decent bone in his body.
Sin is sin.
How about a thrice married serial adulterer who has Bulgarian prostitutes pee on him. Where does that rank on your sin scale?
The big problem with responding to these cray cray threads is that the cray gets promoted back to the front page,when you can't resist any more!
How about we make a thread on GW Bush's WMDs or Ronald Reagan's Iran-Contra deals?
"Bulgarian prostitutes?" You have been reading that salacious spy novel Hillary hired Chris Steele to write for her, haven't you?
I do not claim Obama somehow hurt my family. It was the Iranian regime that had done so, and continues to do so against members of the Iranian Baha'i community which is subject to the same level of repression as the Jews of Germany faced in the 1930s after the passage of the Nuremberg Laws. Rather, I claim that Obama helped to strengthen that regime through this cash transfer, because even the Obama administration admitted that some of that money would go towards terrorist activities.
If you wish to throw this in your personal memory hole and move on tabula rasa, I shall not stop you or hound you with a constant string of reminders of all the terrible decisions President Obama made. But in turn for that modicum of respect, please do not presume to tell me how I should live my life and conduct my discussions on a debate forum in which we debate matters of public policy.
I can appreciate your honest adherence to principle, even if I disagree with the underlying principle itself, tres borrachos. But I do not think those who criticized the policies of the Bush presidency or the policies of past administrations, the consequences of which reverberate long after those administrations end, are automatically idiots. Some may indeed be idiots, or intellectually dishonest hypocrites. Or both. But I am going to give the most basic courtesy and presume that most people who bring up the problems of past administrations have honest grievances that merit discussion.
Well you think Dondal could get laid without money being involved? Rape isn't legal you know, so yeah, pretty much all he has, even Melania is just a more formal whore. Nobody would sleep with him without being paid, or forced.:roll:
President incel if not for prostitutes:2rofll:
And you "admire" this guy?:2rofll:
Well you think Dondal could get laid without money being involved? Rape isn't legal you know, so yeah, pretty much all he has, even Melania is just a more formal whore. Nobody would sleep with him without being paid, or forced.:roll:
President incel if not for prostitutes:2rofll:
And you "admire" this guy?:2rofll: